A cursory glance at any mainstream child development/educational theory will show that for a child to develop into a well rounded adult, they need, amongst other things, firm, well defined boundaries to test themselves/push off against.
Uncontroversial eh?
However the aim of Queer theory (QT) is to subvert/queer those boundaries. To dissolve boundaries around normalcy and challenge mainstream thinking.
Fine and dandy for sherry drinking university students and the academics who want to trangress boundaries. But not children.
Without clear, firm boundaries a child's development is harmed. Independent thought/actions becomes dependent on the adults around, affirming the child.
In other words the child's sense of their own self does not grow independently of the adult. It becomes dependent on adults.
That is why QTs and gender ideologists are dangerous hypocrites. They argue for children to have "bodily autonomy". But they remove the ability for children to understand and exert this concept in any meaningful way.
The "bodily autonomous" child becomes a chattel.
This is a dangerous place for a child to be in. Encouraged to be "bodily autonomous" but not having the autonomy of mind to carry this through in a meaningful way.
They become utterly dependent in this frightening and fearful place on adults affirming them.
Sound familiar?
This opens the door for an adult looking for their own gratification to provide that child with what they need - affirmation.
We are truly in a dangerous place when these same adults argue that these children should be exempt from normal safeguarding procedures.
Any adult advocating for the "queering" of education is not acting in the interests of the child. In fact they are advocating for harm.
We must banish QT to the bourgeois parlours/Common Rooms where it can be played out by dull conformists wishing to appear interesting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short thread about a recent trend that has emerged in the white middle classes - Oppression tourism.
No longer content to drift off to far flung areas of the world, with their rapacious appetites and sense of entitlement, they have settled on a destination closer to home.
Like all tourism with power inequity at its heart, oppression tourism is a deeply harmful practice.
Not for the tourists who can opt out when it becomes uncomfortable & return home. But for members of groups who have sustained generations of systemic and brutal oppression.
They cannot opt out and leave. They now have to compete for scarce resources with these newcomers who are colonising their spaces. Colonisers who have all the advantages that come from being part of the oppressive majority.
Social class, like gender, is a societal construct, designed to benefit those with power and to oppress those with less power.
Your gender is no more inherent within you than your social class. Both constructs are imposed on you
To pretend somehow that a patriarchal control mechanism like gender is inherent within you, that you are in control of it, and that you can identify out of it, is delusional.
No wonder power structures in society are happy to encourage gender identity theory.
And that is why Queer theory is such a losers game. It encourages individuals to opt out of the class/gender struggle and accept the status quo with a few tiny modifications. Ie rainbows and pronouns.
Queering is about selfish gains and not about class or gender emancipation.