In recent days, I've focused on the abrupt resurgence of homophobia within the mainstream GOP. But it's important to remember that the flood of anti-trans hate from the right never stopped. Trans people face a horrific assault on their fundamental rights every single day. #TDOV
Much of the gay community stopped paying attention after Obergefell. But for the trans community, the attacks have only ramped up in the last few years. Transgender Americans have had to plead for allyship and warn what's on the horizon for the LGBTQ community. #TDOV
Anti-trans advocates ostensibly on the left have also stepped up their attacks. I'll never forget seeing TERFs protesting alongside anti-LGBTQ groups before oral arguments at the Supreme Court in Bostock v. Clayton County. Groups that literally want to imprison gay people! #TDOV
Anti-LGBTQ groups didn't disappear after Obergefell. They made a tactical retreat, focusing on trans issues instead. Now that they are winning so many battles against trans equality, they are emboldened once again, and testing the waters for a rollback of marriage equality. #TDOV
Those in the trans community know how emboldened these activists are. They know anti-trans forces are on a winning streak. And they know the onslaught won't stop with them. I'm in awe of their strength and courage as they are forced to battle for their most basic rights. #TDOV
Final thought: It's not all doom and gloom! I LOVE this brief explaining the benefits of gender-affirming care. Trans joy is real and it is beautiful. We talk about gender dysphoria a lot. Don't forget what's on the other side: gender euphoria.💜 aclu.org/sites/default/… #TDOV
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In his decision blocking most of Florida's new voter suppression bill, Judge Mark Walker explicitly calls out other courts—including SCOTUS—for putting the right to vote "under siege" by "gutting" the Voting Rights Act. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2156…
After quoting MLK (below), Judge Walker writes:
"Federal courts would not countenance a law denying Christians their sacred right to prayer, and they should not countenance a law denying Floridians their sacred right to vote." s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2156…
!!! Because Florida "has repeatedly, recently, and persistently acted to deny Black Floridians access to the franchise," Walker places the state back under preclearance—requiring federal approval for any future changes to election law. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2156…
I am very hesitant to say anything about this after the flood of tweets calling me a "groomer" yesterday. But because Miller spent hours insisting that it was not homophobic to tweet "Why aren't one of them having a baby?" about a same-sex couple, I have one more thing to say.
Miller insisted that he was not making fun of same-sex couples, but rather mocking transgender people.
I want to be clear about this: Exploiting a same-sex couple's inability to start a family without adoption or ART in order to score transphobic points is repulsive and immoral.
It is morally repugnant to seize upon a same-sex couple's announcement that they are starting a family—which should be cause for joy and celebration—to call attention to the fact that they require assistance in the form of adoption of surrogacy.
Last week I wrote about the GOP ending its tactical retreat on same-sex marriage and turbocharging its anti-gay agenda. There's a cultural element to this, too—we're seeing the party's media figures attempt to resuscitate the kind of casual homophobia that seemed to be waning.
It's not just the resurgence of Republican claims that gay people are "groomers" who indoctrinate and molest children. It's the return of nasty, drive-by homophobia, the casual mockery of same-sex couples that works hand-in-hand with anti-gay legislation.
It seems to me that casual mockery of gay people and their families is on the rise among the conservative media figures whose job is to restore a cultural environment in which anti-gay legislation is deemed acceptable. We are backsliding on gay rights with truly shocking speed.
Can confirm based on years of reporting. I have long been frustrated that so many conservatives know Ginni Thomas is a lunatic but refuse to even hint at this fact on the record for fear of alienating her husband.
This fact is also pretty obvious from @maggieNYT's fantastic reporting on Ginni and Trump. The Trump White House avoided hosting Ginni for a long time, begrudgingly invited her for the sole purpose of appeasing Clarence, then dismissed her as a nut. nytimes.com/2019/01/26/us/…
My only consolation is that it's pretty funny to think about all the high-powered conservatives in DC who periodically have to listen to Ginni Thomas rant about QAnon and "transsexual fascists" to remain in good graces with her husband. Especially Mark Meadows.
Please do not fall for conservative media's efforts to obscure the real meaning of Florida's "Don't Say Gay" bill, which DeSantis just signed into law. I encourage you read the statute for yourself and explore its key provisions line by line: slate.com/news-and-polit…
Please remember that the Florida law *does not prohibit teachers from talking to kids about sex*—which is ostensibly its chief purpose.
Democrats offered an amendment that would have outlawed instruction on "sexual activity" and Republicans voted it down. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Read @c_cauterucci on Republicans' refusal to acknowledge what their new law actually does, and how right-wing media has run with their lies: slate.com/news-and-polit…
It is nice to know the Supreme Court apparently does not believe federal judges have the authority to seize control over the assignment and deployment of unvaccinated troops.
Alito and Gorsuch: The First Amendment's free exercise clause empowers federal judges to overrule commanding officers and order the deployment of unvaccinated troops because of the existence of medical exemptions.
I just want to reiterate that the unvaccinated SEALs here were not expelled from the military. They were simply NOT deployed because their unvaccinated status was deemed a threat to the mission.
Three justices think the federal judiciary can override that determination.