1/
The Hampton City School district in Virginia has passed a set of guidelines which say teachers can change a students gender **WITHOUT TELLING THE PARENTS.**

Under these guidelines teachers can help your kid change genders behind your back, and never have to tell you.
2/
The excuse for this rule is, of course, "safety."

The woke think that not letting people (even 5 year olds) change genders is harmful. Anything other than "affirming" a new gender is seen as abuse. So they decided to help students change genders behind the backs of parents.
3/
This means a group of people who have bachelors degrees in educations, and have *zero* training in psychology, biology, sociology, (or any other discipline related to sex and gender) are now allowed to help student change genders without telling the parents what's happening.
4/
You can see how they made this work.

They think that to refuse to allow your 5 year old to change his gender and to claim he is a girl is equivalent to physical or sexual abuse.

They actually that believe telling a boy he is not a girl is just like assaulting that boy.
5/
The reason for this is that the woke think "boy" and "girl" are PURELY social roles enforced by social rules, NOT categories describing a physical/biological reality.
They think talking about a "biological boy" is like talking about a "biological mailman" or biological lawyer
6/
They think anyone can occupy the social role of "girl." For them a "girl" is just a role consisting of the behavior we typically ascribe to girls (being feminine, wearing dresses, wearing makeup, etc), and since a man with a penis can do those things, he can become a woman.
7/
So when your 5 year old boy wants to become a girl and you tell him no, they see that as forcing your child to adopt and identity that he doesn't want. The woke see that as a form of child abuse every bit as sever as beating a child.

So when parents stop kids from....
8/
Changing genders that is seen as the parents doing harm to the child, and on that basis the teachers have decided to help 5 year old children change their gender behind the back of the parents.

I want you to ponder the consequences of this...
9/
Woke teachers have decided that parents do not have final say over what their kids learn about how sex and gender work. They have decided to put themselves between the children and parents, and then tell the kids that they, the teachers, can be trusted more than parents.
10/
Armed with a bachelors degree in education, some youtube videos, a few tik toks, and a 2 hour seminar they attended on trans rights, woke teachers have decided they are qualified to help 5 year olds make potentially life changing decisions behind their parents backs.
11/
Finally, 2 points.

1. If you have not become involved in your local schoolboard the time to start is now.

2. This is why Florida banned the teaching of gender for grades k-3.

Stop letting the media lie to you. Stop listening to them, and start getting involved...
12/
The woke teachers have made up their mind. The time for persuasion has ended, now is the time for activism.

Get to work. Now.

/fin
PS/
Here is a link to the guidelines

hampton.k12.va.us/departments/eq…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

Mar 31
Most postmodern "insights" can be refuted simply by understanding 2 the following distinctions:

Ontogicaly objective/ontologically subjective (OO/OS)

And,

Epistemically objective/epistemicallt subjective. (EO/ES)

once you understand that set of distinctions...
Then you realize

1. The subjective ontology of an object doesn't imply propositional claims about said object are epistemically subjective

2. The subjective ontology of the proposition itself doesn't imply that a propositions' truth claim is epistemically subjective...
3. The subjective ontology of categories does not imply that the set of objects in the extension of a given category are also ontogically subjective

Once you sort out these mistakes postmodern insights become very evidently little more then a series of muddles and confusions.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 28
Leave it to a feminist to encourage violence between men. So long as she isn't the one getting hit violence is ok.

These people have zero problem with the bodies of men lying dead in the street...because that's what you get when the standard response to insults is violence. Image
Men, don't let yourself be dragged into a deadly confrontation because some woman loves the idea of men being violent to protect her honour.

It's not worth getting killed because you felt the need to pick a fight with a guy to joked about your girls shoes, clothing, or haircut.
If a woman wants you picking dights because she can't take a joke RUN.

Don't walk....RUN.

You absolutely do not need to dragged into a deadly situation because she got her feelings hurt.

No.

Ugh.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 23
1/
Wokeness has utterly corrupted Universities.

Steven Crowder submitted a paper called "Fatness as Self-care in the Era of Trump" to an academic conference at Massey University using the name "Sea Mattheson."

The paper, which is every bit as absurd as you imagine, was accepted
2/
Not only that, but Steven Croder (@scrowder) who is a man, dressed up as a woman, called himself Sea Mattheson, and digitally presented the paper at the virtual conference for PhD's and tenured professors ... and nobody at the conference could tell that the paper was a joke.
3/
IT'S THE 3RD TIME THIS HAPPENED:

1996-Alan Sokal has absurd paper published in an academic journal.

2017-@ConceptualJames @peterboghossian and Helen Pluckrose got 7 absurd papers published in academic journals

2020-@crowder has a absurd paper accepted to academic conference
Read 14 tweets
Mar 18
A man who tries to live as a woman says it's unfair for trans women to compete in women's sports is accused of transphobia and responds by joking about how he has balls....and it's socially unacceptable to publicly acknowledge the very reality that makes the joke funny...
This is where the clown world (🤡🌎) meme comes from.

It's a meme level description of the nihilistic absurdity that lies at the heart of the postmodern world, and an attempt to describe in meme form the absurdity of a world that created by adopting the postmodern worldview.
Other memes like this are "lol, nothing matters," and "we are not a serious people."

Both of which seek to describe the fact that the postmodern world doesn't believe in the transcendant so nothing ever rises to the level where it is sincerely treated as though it really matters
Read 5 tweets
Mar 15
1/
You do not need to internalize the voice of the most pedantic person in your mentions when you write.

You should always listen to careful critique, we all need it.

You do not need to satisfy every single nitpicky objection from people who just want a reason to dismiss you...
2/
We all can get things wrong, I know I do (below a thread of all my apologies for when I've messed up).

When someone says "that's not what meant!" don't reply with "yes you did! Admit it. I got you!!!"

Give them some space to say what the mean...

3/
Don't let yourself be nitpicked by pedants who are trying to make you look bad. Also, don't become that person.

Don't try to force people into you frame of reasoning by giving tearse answers and demanding they parse your point on your terms so they have to adopt your frame...
Read 6 tweets
Mar 15
1/
someone claimed I did not deal sufficiently with the thread done by @scott_m_coley.

So here we go. Breifly

Scott say I go from saying she ignores doctrinal truth, to saying she has unconventional methods for deciding questions of truth.

This is not what I was arguing...
2/
Kristin has said she did not analyze whether eva doctrines, ideas, or beliefs are true.

This is the first thing I said, I thing it's clear that I was correct.

However....
3/
Kristin also argues that White evangelicals "transformed the Jesus of the Gospels into an image of their own making."

How can she conclude that they have a wrong image of Jesus (pic 1) she never inspected evangelical doctrines, beliefs, and ideas for truth? (Pic 2)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(