Tl;dr President Oaks is wrong about queer people.

He ain't say anything new, but he didn't really need to. He validated the church's queerphobia by putting God's name on it multiple times. No scriptures quoted. Just divine hearsay. #GeneralConference
In next Sunday's Come Follow Me lesson, we'll read about the Israelites failing some significant tests, even though they were told what would be on the test. The same folks that walked across the Red Sea would complain against God twice about similar crises.
They doubt what God could do because they forgot what God had done.

I see members of my church do similar things today. They act brand new when queer folks expect to be treated like human beings, meanwhile we've had the necessary revelation to pass this test for centuries.
"All are alike unto God", "God is no respecter of persons", "There is no male nor female, Jew nor greek, bond nor free, for you are all one in Christ Jesus", and scores of other verses have been available for centuries.

In other words, we're failing this test.
I can appreciate the caution some want to take in not complaining against the brethren. In those same stories I cited, Moses also tells the Israelites that they're not complaining against him, but God. Moses was God's mouthpiece on earth and we believe the brethren to be the same
However, there were times when Moses either didn't have all the answers (see: Jethro, daughters of Zelophehad) or straight up acted contrary to the direction he received (see: Not circumcising his son, smiting the rock instead of talking to it).
In such cases, I hope we could act as Zipporah did and step up to do what is necessary to protect our families and the means of fulfilling God's covenant to their people. All I have spoons to do right now is simply say that President Oaks is wrong.
Queer people are entitled to everything the rest of us are entitled to by virtue of our orientation alone. I hope those of y'all who feel the same way can at least declare the same. I'd go as far as to say it's part of our covenantally obligated responsibility (Mosiah 18:9)
I hope we can also act as Judah and ask ourselves "how shall I go up to my [heavenly parents], and [my queer siblings] not be with me"? "Family Proclamation" is going to be the wrong answer.

President Oaks is wrong.

Le Fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stone Catcher Freeman

Stone Catcher Freeman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamcjon

Feb 9
The following probably goes without saying, but I want to say it out loud:

The church's greatest stumbling block is itself.
There is actually protocol for what Brother Wilcox did. The person conducting the meeting was supposed to shut that ish down or, at the very least, correct it when his remarks were finished.
Even without the protocol, the scriptures teach "...if any one offend openly, he or she shall be rebuked openly, that he or she may be ashamed" (D&C 42:91). Paul also called out Peter's hypocrisy publicly to his face (Gal 2:12-17)
Read 6 tweets
Feb 8

I thought folks were taking this out of context originally, but it's still pretty bad even in context.

I can appreciate the spirit of what Brad Wilcox is trying to do as someone whose list of theological questions continues to grow as I work out answers
to others. This may be his way of minimizing the question for the sake of not burdening those with more fragile faith. I've been guilty of this myself, particularly with doctrinal issues I didn't feel I had any immediate skin in.

What Brother Wilcox is doing though is dangerous
For one thing, why Black people didn't get the priesthood or temple blessings until 1978 is a legitimate question, especially considering the spiritual and social implications of those restrictions. If racism played a part in that, that's urgent and important reparative work the
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(