1) Russia's attempt to surround and capture Kiev has failed after meeting fierce resistance from Ukrainian forces, and poor execution by the Russian military. The seige of Chernihiv has also been lifted. Map from @nytimes.
2) The capture of Kiev was one of several key objectives for Russia. The south (Black Sea & Sea of Azov) & east (Donbas) are the other objectives, & fighting continues there. Russia still controls considerable territory and is attempting to encircle Ukrainian troops in the east.
3) Russia announced it was pulling back from Kiev a week ago after 'achieving its objectives' and in order to de-escalate, & would shift resources to focus on the Donbas region. Clearly propaganda. Russia's defeat in Kiev certainly wasn't part of its plan.
4) The Russian military advanced to the eastern and western outskirts of Kiev but failed to sustain its forces due to superior Ukrainian perseverance and tactics, Russian logistical problems, tactical incompetence, and a failure to commit more resources to the fight.
5) It is clear that the Russian leadership/military came to the conclusion that pouring more resources into the maw of Kiev would not help it achieve its objective. The Russian military lost significant numbers of armored vehicles and troops in the Kiev operation ...
6) ... although I do think the 40,000 killed/wounded number floated is inflated.
Keep in mind we still don't understand the extent of Ukraine's losses in the battle for Kiev. Ukrainian forces will also have to consolidate and refit for the next fight.
8) While Russia's loss in Kiev certainly stings Putin and Moscow, it did serve to tie down Ukrainian resources needed in the east & south, where Russia has made significant gains and theoretically has an advantage with shorter supply lines, control of seas, etc.
9) "Theoretically" because it is unclear if Russia will learn from its mistakes in Kiev. The loss is Kiev is a very bitter pill for the Russian military. If Russia wants to have success in the east & south, it will have to adapt and commit more resources.
10) Ukraine may be able to shift resources to the south & east, but it must continue to devote units to defend Kiev, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, etc. In the short term, a renewed Russian offensive against Kiev is highly unlikely, but Ukraine must remain vigilant.
11) Russia has intensified its operations in the Donbas & east. Izium fell last week and Russian troops are slowly advancing southward, while Russian forces on the east & west bank of the Dnieper River are attempting to push northward Zaporizhzhia & Kryvyi Rih.
12) Fighting outside of Mykolaiv continues and Ukrainian forces are counterattacking in an attempt to halt a westward Russian advance towards Odesa, the last major port Ukrainian-held on the Black Sea. Russia has launched missile strikes into Odesa.
13) Russia's mistakes (excluding the tactical issues) are that it underestimated the Ukrainian's willingness to defend Kiev, and overestimated its ability to effectively fight on multiple fronts.
14) Russia may have been better served by focusing on Kharkiv region, and the south and east, with a limited operation to tie down Ukrainian forces north of Kiev. It would have had more resources for operations in those theaters.
15) Ukraine's victory in Kiev is significant, but must be viewed as a victory in one battle in the war. Russia still controls significant territory in the south and east, and is pressing its offensives.
16) Sanctions have yet to break the Russian economy or lead to Putin's overthrow (there is evidence that Putin's popularity may growing, but that is unclear). Some NATO/EU countries, led by Germany, are resisting calls to increase sanctions due to dependance on Russian gas/oil.
17) President Zelensky has conceded on several Russian demands, including neutrality & non-NATO status. The issue of territory will be a major sticking point, and that likely will be dictated by success or failure on the battlefield. This war was never going to be quick.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) “Increasingly, Ukrainians are confronting an uncomfortable truth: The military’s understandable impulse to defend against Russian attacks could be putting civilians in the crosshairs.”
3) “Virtually every neighborhood in most cities has become militarized, some more than others, making them potential targets for Russian forces trying to take out Ukrainian defenses.”
1) This is an unpopular view (an argument I made from the beginning) that gets you branded as pro-Putin, but it needs to be understood. The inability to discuss the warfighting without the basest level of emotionalism is blinding us to what is happening. newsweek.com/putins-bombers…
2) "If we merely convince ourselves that Russia is bombing indiscriminately, or [that] it is failing to inflict more harm because its personnel are not up to the task or because it is technically inept, then we are not seeing the real conflict."
3) "As of the past weekend, in 24 days of conflict, Russia has flown some 1,400 strike sorties and delivered almost 1,000 missiles (by contrast, the United States flew more sorties and delivered more weapons in the first day of the 2003 Iraq war)."
1) The Ukrainian counteroffensive around Kiev & the fog of war. @nytimes: "... signs of actual, on the ground progress were elusive. Ukrainian forces have been unable to demonstrate they control villages or towns previously held by the Russian army." nytimes.com/live/2022/03/2…
2) The town of Irpin: "The deputy police chief of Irpin, Oleksandr Bogai, said Russian soldiers were still in the town, occupying several districts and fighting Ukrainian forces. That is essentially the same situation that has persisted for nearly the entire month of the war."
3) "In Makariv, another battleground town to the west of Kyiv that Ukrainian officials claimed to have recaptured this week, the fighting was also ongoing, Vadym Tokar, the mayor, said in a telephone interview."
1) @SpencerGuard created "The Mini-Manual for the
Urban Defender." A must read for those interested in how to prepare for and execute an urban defense. @SpencerGuard puts this in terms that anyone can understand. Kudos.
2) Two weeks ago, I wrote a quick thread on the impact on civilians once the decision is made to defend cities. Once you go down that, all bets are off and civilian casualties will skyrocket. The Mini-Manual for the Urban Defender shows why this is true.
3) Once you understand how an urban defense is established and maintained, you will see why attackers often will make little distinction between military and civilian targets. This is because the defenders are using every building, street, alley, etc. as a fighting position.
2) The Ministry of Armed Forces highlights 5 areas: Kiev, Kharkiv, Dnipro (the French rightly see this as a strategic point, as I have noted in the past), Mariupol, and Mykolaiv. I will summarize France's analysis of each area.
3) Kiev: The Russians have not completed the encirclement, the Ukrainians flooded the Irpin River to slow the Russians [smart move], and the Ukrainians have retaken the town of Makariv to the west of Kiev [nice win for the Ukrainians].
1) Today's must read, by @TaskandPurpose's Andrew Milburn:
"Overconfidence may obscure for the Ukrainians one salient fact about this conflict: Time is not on their side.
2) Milburn notes that the Russians are adapting their tactics: "The Russians are already adapting, and by doing so are narrowing the Ukrainians’ tactical edge."
3) "The one-sided culling of Russian armored columns that characterized the opening days of the war, and kept YouTube subscribers around the world happy, are a thing of the past."