Yoel Roth Profile picture
Apr 5 6 tweets 2 min read
Since the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, our aim has been to remediate abuse at scale and be transparent about our work to protect the conversation happening on Twitter. Today, we’re sharing two key updates about government affiliated accounts. blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/c…
Beginning today, we will require the removal of Tweets posted by government or state-affiliated media accounts which share media that depict prisoners of war in the context of the war in Ukraine. help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p….
We’re doing so in line with international humanitarian law, and in consultation with international human rights groups. To protect essential reporting on the war, some exceptions apply under this guidance where there is a compelling public interest or newsworthy POW content.
For years, we’ve worked to add context to government accounts, because it should be clear to people when an account is engaging in geopolitical issues.
Starting today, we will not amplify or recommend government accounts belonging to states that limit access to free information and are engaged in armed interstate conflict – whether Twitter is blocked in that country or not.
What does this mean?

We won’t recommend these accounts, and we won't amplify them across the Home Timeline, Explore, Search, and in other places on Twitter. This measure drastically reduces the chance that people on Twitter see Tweets from these accounts unless they follow them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yoel Roth

Yoel Roth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yoyoel

Mar 11
We’re adding labels to accounts and Tweets sharing links of state-affiliated media outlets in Belarus after detailed reporting about their role in the war in Ukraine. This builds on our years-long work to add context to state media outlets and limit their reach on Twitter. 🧵
Last week, we launched labels on Tweets sharing links to Russian state-affiliated news media.

Early data suggests that our interventions here are working: We've seen a 30% drop in impressions on Tweets labeled under this expanded policy.
Why label Belarusian outlets now? Expert voices have highlighted Belarus’ involvement in the war in Ukraine. Coupled with what we’re seeing on the service around engagement with state-affiliated media, we see transparency about these outlets as key.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 7, 2021
Have been sitting with the Apple announcement for a couple of days to try to avoid tweeting a regrettable hot take. This thread from @alexstamos just about captures it for me — as well as @gruber’s writeup: daringfireball.net/2021/08/apple_…
More than anything, announcing these 3 fundamentally distinct features together feels like a (rare) colossal PR misstep by Apple. Grouping together anti-CSE tech (broadly good) with parental controls (somewhere between meh and dangerous) muddies the waters unproductively.
Apple in 2021 has a trust deficit with the security and privacy community — with good reason (nytimes.com/2021/05/17/tec…). The choices they’ve made about how to do business in China enable the slippery-slope arguments we’ve seen here.
Read 4 tweets
May 24, 2020
We've seen no evidence to support the claim that "nearly half of the accounts Tweeting about #COVID19 are likely bots.” 🧵 with a few thoughts on the subject... npr.org/sections/coron…
First, we should get our terms straight: "Bot" means a lot of different things to a lot of different people — and doesn't necessarily refer to coordinated, manipulative, or inauthentic behavior.
There are lots of different ways of using Twitter. Some people Tweet a lot; some never Tweet at all, or only Tweet sporadically. There's no right or wrong way to use Twitter — and many "bot" studies wind up dismissing a lot of real activity as inauthentic.
Read 9 tweets
May 28, 2019
Earlier this month, we removed more than 2,800 inauthentic accounts originating in Iran. These are the accounts that FireEye, a private security firm, reported on today. We were not provided with this report or its findings.
As we conduct investigations into the wider networks and actors involved in information operations, we typically avoid making any declarative public statements until we can be sure that we have reached the end of our analyses.
These accounts employed a range of false personas to target conversations about political and social issues in Iran and globally. Some engaged directly through public replies with politicians, journalists, and others.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 8, 2019
Today, we lowered the limit on the number of accounts you can follow per day from 1000 to 400. Some people are wondering why we picked 400. Well, I’m glad you asked. Nerdy thread on rate limits and anti-spam technology 👇...
First things first: You can’t stop spam, bots, or other types of manipulation with rate limits alone. However, rate limits *do* make each spam account less effective, slower, and more expensive to operate.
So, why 400 per day, and not 100? Or 58? Or 17? In short, we found that 400 is a reasonable limit that allows people to follow the accounts they’re interested in each day while stopping the most spam.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 21, 2019
A write-up in Politico yesterday made a lot of strong claims about potential foreign disinformation campaigns targeting presidential candidates. I want to share a few quick thoughts and provide additional clarity. politico.com/story/2019/02/…
Last fall, we reviewed the #VoterFraud report carefully, and found no substantial evidence indicating “the involvement of foreign state actors” or even malicious coordinated activity. iwr.ai/voterfraud/ind…
The #VoterFraud authors were clear about the limits of their methodology and went further than most by releasing the underlying accounts they studied to enable peer review.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(