The Senate Health bill analysis is out for #SB1464, a bill introduced by @DrPanMD that would defund local law enforcement unless they do exactly what public health agencies tell them to do.
Only two groups and just two individuals expressed support for #SB1464. Two!
Over 40 groups and over 1,600 individuals oppose the bill. Tons!
But who are those two groups in support?
/ 3
The first is @protectustwt, the bill’s sponsor. This is a shill group created by none other than Pan himself. Pan is doing a joint fundraiser for them this Thursday afternoon. He’s also given them at least $100k from his campaign accounts.
The other is @OfficersHealth (HOAC). Their board is made up from many counties that oppose #SB1464.
If you see your health officer on the list, you should probably ask your county supervisors about your county’s health officer’s support.
/ 5
It gets worse w/ HOAC. They appear to be funded by local tax dollars.
This would mean cities & counties are funding an organization actively working against their citizens, to strip funding from local law enforcement, and give it to the health depts.
Unbelievable! The California Democrat controlled legislature cut off a Republican lawmaker’s microphone when he presented real data about teens desisting.
He was speaking in opposition to #AB957, a bill which would force parents affirm their child’s perceived gender identity or else risk losing custody.
Here is what @J_GallagherAD3 was allowed to say before he was cut off.
He was making the point that social transition might not always be the best solution for kids struggling with gender identity and that most identify with their biological sex as they became adults.
@J_GallagherAD3 In opposition to #AB957, @Patterdude rightfully said this bill would add unnecessary complexity to an already complicated situation.
“You were misgendering… You were saying male in female sports.”
A librarian at a Davis, CA public library revoked a group’s reservation a few minutes into the program after the first speaker referred to transgender athletes playing in women’s sports as male.
IG:
Earlier, the librarian suggested it was against state law to misgender someone or a group of people.
That was his basis for kicking them out of the public library, making it impossible to talk about the problem of biological males competing in female sports.
Here is the moment the librarian kicked out the first speaker from the public library.
Her offense was simply saying biological men have a physical competitive advantage over women in sports.
📣: California mom breaks silence on losing job for speaking at her children’s school board meeting.
This well-mannered mom spoke at the @BeniciaUSD board meeting, expressing concern the new sex-ed curriculum was teaching 10 year-olds they could choose their own gender.
Within days, a group formally affiliated with @TheDemocrats contacted her work, demanded and successfully got her fired.
The mom tells her story in this new video and shares details on this website:
What did this mom say that earned her the vitriol of The Progressive Democrats of Benicia?
She said what many parents across California are concerned with, doing so articulately & politely.
It’s insane anyone would lose their job for this civic engagement.
YouTube:
The Progressive Democrats of Benicia are formally affiliated with the Democratic party as a chartered club of the Solano County Democratic Central Committee.
BREAKING: On a 4-1 vote, @ChinoValleyUSD adopted a policy which includes a requirement the district notify parents when their child requests to be identified or treated as a gender different from their biological sex, wants to use opposite-sex facilities, or suspects their child… https://t.co/167KzTlGvCtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
“Tell Sacramento to back down, and then I’ll back down.”
Very passionate speech by Board President Shaw prior to the vote.
Prior to any public comment, the district’s legal representation discussed how the parental notification policy is fully compliant with the law and he addresses many misconceptions by those who say it isn’t legal. The eight minutes are definitely worth a listen.
“Many [transgender] children are not safe in their own homes because of a non-affirming caretaker.”
Author of #AB957 said at the bill’s hearing today. This bill would require a parent affirm their child’s “gender identity” or else risk losing custody of their child.
“If both parents are accepting of the child’s gender identity, this issue will not be the thing that tips the scale towards any parent.”
A witness in favor of the bill says affirming a child’s gender identity is the only acceptable approach, including surgery if the child wants it.
This bill is absent on if male, female, or non-binary identities are the limit. Neo-pronouns and an infinite number of gender… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mind blowing statement from @GavinNewsom on SB 107, considering all of his medical mandates on kids.
“Parents know what's best for their kids, and they should be able to make decisions around the health of their children without fear. We must take a stand for parental choice.”
Note, SB 107 actually strips away parental rights in some cases, allowing some out-of-state teens to run away from home and get CA taxpayer paid “gender affirming care.”