The Russian Army might be in worse shape than imagined (and Ive probably been about as skeptical about their condition as anyone since this started). It also looks like Putin doesnt trust forces that were not sent to Ukraine in the first place.
Why? There are signs that the Russians want to send the troops that have pulled out of Kyiv, Chernihiv and Sumy into the Donbas quickly, including those responsible for the Bucha massacre. english.nv.ua/nation/russian…
Pentagon sources are saying that the plan is to send about two-thirds of the forces that the Russians have pulled out of the north and redeploy to the south and east.
If so, this is an army in terrible shape and running out of options. These troops have been worn down, defeated, lost much of their equipment and would under any circumstances be close to being combat ineffective. globalsecurity.org/military/libra…
Combat ineffectiveness is not a science, but throughout history unit performance has degraded considerably when these factors rise: losses of personnel and equipment, time in combat operations, battlefield failure. All of these are now high for the Russian forces being redeployed
Those troops in any rational system would be rested, re-equipped and allowed time before being sent to another stressful combat situation. That Putin is going to try and do it with these forces reveals these 4 things which show how difficult the long-war scenario is for Russia.
1) The Russians dont trust the rest of their armed forces. If they could, they would be sending fresh troops into combat not these that have suffered such losses.
2) They are willing to basically see the best part of their army wiped out in the first phase of the war. If for some reason they can get these troops back to other parts of Ukraine and they go into combat again, hard to see what would be left of them after a few weeks.
3) They dont care about the morale of their own forces. This is particularly toxic. If the Russian soldiers believe that they are basically cannon fodder for the leadership, their willingness to fight will decline below what it already is.
4) The Russians are out of ideas. If you are sending troops that have committed some of the worst crimes back into Ukraine, they will only motivate Ukrainian resistance (which has already shown itself to be effective) to even higher levels. Its a stupid idea.
What does it mean? Russia really does not want to fight a long war and Ukraine has a real opportunity. If the Ukrainians can be resupplied and redeployed to meet the Russian redeployments, they can basically waste the only combat force the Russian government believes in.
Thats why its so important to get help to Ukraine now. Give them the opportunity to destroy the Russian forces that will be redeployed from Kyiv and they can force Putin to take a choice he is clearly terrified to make. Fight a long war with conscripts or forces he doesnt trust.
An interesting point worth expanding this thread on. I’ve always tried to imagine a negotiated end to this war as there will have to be one (Ukraine is not conquering Russia). Reality now though is that negotiations are meaningless until…
We’ve had another test of arms in the Donbas. Putin is clearly trying to use military force to save something he can call a victory from the original failure. Until that contest is decided, negotiations can’t decide anything. So keep talking, yes…
But most importantly help Ukraine to militarily succeed in the Donbas by degrading the one force the Russian government trusts. Then negotiate.
Two things to note here. U.K. MOD map also has Russian forces almost all gone from northern Ukraine. They are also putting more stress on the time needed to reequip the withdrawn forces. Sensible. This is not easy. If the Russians send those troops quickly, it’s a sign of panic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Apr 7
A thread about Russian options in the east/south and timelines. There is talk these days about Russia wanting to tie up operations by May 9 (Victory Day) and making major advances either to cut the Ukrainians off in Donbas or move up to Dnipro.
This is a huge area of operations that would require skilful planning and coordination, motivated forces and great supply. It’s not something that the Russians have given any indication to this point they could pull off, esp with an army that has been suffering for 6 weeks.
First the size. To put the area of operations in context the distance from Kharkiv to Mariupol is 420 kms; around 260 miles. In U.K. terms it’s almost the length of England (London to Sunderland) in US terms it’s like going NYC to WDC and then back to Baltimore. Image
Read 19 tweets
Apr 7
This is exactly the right kind of question that we need to be asking ourselves. It’s not a question between having energy and somehow abandoning Ukraine. It’s having some short term pain to basically guarantee the peace in Europe for a generation.
If when the dust settles in this war and Ukraine is a functioning, free democracy, admitted to the EU, that basically ends the eastern question. Russia will have weakened itself so much, and is in such relative decline anyway, that European military security is guaranteed
Hard to see even how Belarus remains a Russian puppet. And who knows; maybe a new generation of Russian’s whose minds were not shaped by the USSR can see its future as a cooperative member or Europe.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 6
There is alot of interesting information in this pentagon briefing. Russians out of the north, have started to try and rebuild those units, will want to try and get them to Donbas quickly but not sure that they actually can. Right now there are 30 BTGs in Donbas….
BTGs estimated to have started the campaign with 800-1000 soldiers. (How many they would have left at this point is a guess, but probably safe to say approx 20000 at most).
(If this is right, the present force in Donbas, imo, is nowhere near large enough to be able to do the job of taking that region)
Read 4 tweets
Apr 6
Thanks @EliotACohen , you are right the next period will reveal a great deal about how combat effective these troops are. Also important for us to understand how this fits into the long war narrative.
In response to my thread @RALee85 wrote this saying it’s not a matter of trust but numbers. It’s an interesting distinction but I think it does gloss over something important.
The Russians could be sending the 25% of their unused BTGs to the Donbas, a force which would be approximately equal to the forces deployed in the north around Kyiv etc. they could also be trying to assemble fresh forces from the still unused 100000s of army forces.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 6
Updating this thread today. Another reason that Ukrainian government estimates of Russia losses might be more accurate, is that their estimates do seem to go through interesting lulls. Only 8 tanks added to the estimates since yesterday.
If you think back to earlier in the war, that was the case for Fuel tanks. Early in the war when Russian logistics seemed truly awful and amateurish, the Ukrainians claimed to have destroyed 60 fuel tanks. That number has only crept up a little since, to 76.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 5
A thread on claimed Russian losses, and why the Ukrainian official claims might be far more accurate than people think.
Its important to be skeptical of any government claiming losses inflicted on an enemy, historically such figures can be grossly inflated. One extreme example was the Japanese government in World War II, which claimed to basically wipe out the US Pacific fleet in every battle.
Only for the pesky Pacific Fleet to keep being amazingly rebuilt in a few months and appearing closer to Japan each time. As such, Ive never used official Ukrainian claims on Russian losses during this war. Here is the most recent claims.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(