Wealthier, whiter people dominate the Urgency of Normal movement (not all, I know). And they aren't listening to the voices they claim to care about; instead, they selfishly want their kids to be ok because, ultimately, they'll be ok.
Distressing to see old information relying on low-qualitied studies being described by physicians at a UBC event. Here is the evidence we have from higher quality, longitudinal studies, some in canada:
/1
In this study from Denmark, they followed kids longitudinally from prior to the pandemic to two distinct RESTRICTIONS periods. They found entirely average scores of mental health, and kids with previous mental saw improved scores.
/2
In this study out of Australia, both kids with neurodevelopmental disabilities and those without saw no change during periods of school restrictions, but kids without NDDs saw an increase in depressive symptoms when schools OPENED.
Let us all learn from one of the worst humans in politics. Here, we can show an incredible number of logical fallacies in one tweet.
Unsurprisingly, as one of the least thoughtful, most reprehensible people on the planet, MTG's awful expressions are also logically repugnant.
/1
"there is a line in the sand."
This is called "ipse dixit"/"bare assertion fallacy." It is a claim that is presented without any evidence, and is presented as simple fact.
This also is a "straw man" - as nobody is discussing or arguing about this personified wart's "line."
/2
"Either you are..." presents the "false dilemma" (fallacy of bifurcation). The dichotomy is set up entirely by them, when in fact, i am certain that many people who support transgender people who would disagree with this detestable malcontent.
/3
There were many considerations that governments, researchers, and leaders balanced as they considered measures to "protect kids mental health," under the psychopathic notion that "covid isn't that bad for kids." Very few considered the direct cost of a child losing a caregiver /1
For every adult caregiver, caregiving grandparent, or other important adult who died in a child's life during COVID due to someone being unvaccinated, or a responsible policy not being followed, a child was directly harmed.
/2
For anyone who dares say "COVID isn't that bad for kids," a hearty middle finger emoji to you. That includes the entire #urgencyofnormal crew, and every psychopathic keyboard warrior determined to exercise their "freedoms" over protecting their fellow humans.
/3
What predicted future happiness during the pandemic for mothers of children 0-6?
Important to note that this study is out of Japan, so there are cultural and population differences.
A study followed 2480 Japanese mothers comparing Feb to Jun 2020.
/1
😀🔼:
- homemaker vs employed
- happiness before the pandemic
- satisfaction with COVID protections
- participating in preventative pandemic behaviours
- positive thinking about the pandemic in general
/1
😀🔽:
- poor prior mental health
- experienced a number of negative changes due to the pandemic (“special precautions”, “financial difficulty”, “fear of COVID-19”, “less relaxation time”, “increased partner aggression ”, and “sense of unfairness”)
/2
=-=-=-Suicidology Thread -=-=-=
Let's take a look at kids in ☀️California☀️, where the political rhetoric re: suicides was very high.
First, let's set the pre-pandemic stage.
Prior to 2020, the pediatric suicide rate in California was increasing, though 2019 a lower year.
/1
Like most modern societies, pediatric suicides in California were closely tied to school months. Suicides during school months were 1.4-1.8X more common.
/2
Similarly, there is a strong "monday effect" of suicides for kids. Children in California are about 1.3-1.4X more likely to die on mondays-thursdays than they are on saturdays. Sundays and Fridays in between. This is a common pattern for kids in Western cultures.