You may not have heard of German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
His involvement in a plot to overthrow Adolf Hitler led to his imprisonment & execution, & his thoughts on the causes & dangers of stupidity are fascinating, & imho, once again extremely relevant.
Bonhoeffer grew up amid the academic circles of the University of Berlin, where his father, Karl Bonhoeffer, was a professor of psychiatry & neurology. His father also was one of the most prominent psychiatrists to oppose the T4 (euthanasia) Program initiated by Hitler in 1939.
From 1923 to 1927 Dietrich Bonhoeffer studied theology at the universities of Tübingen & Berlin. His doctoral thesis combined a sociology & theology & he later traced the influence of Kantian transcendental philosophy & ontology on Protestant & Catholic theologies.
With the rise of the Nazis from 1933, Bonhoeffer was involved in protests against the regime, especially its anti-Semitism. He served as pastor in London (1933–35), but became a leading spokesman for the Confessing Church, the centre of German Protestant resistance to the Nazis.
Bonhoeffer’s involvement became increasingly political after 1938, when his brother-in-law introduced him to a group seeking Hitler’s overthrow. In 1939 Bonhoeffer considered taking refuge in the US but returned after two weeks to “share the trials of this time with my people.”
Arrested & imprisoned, Bonhoeffer reflected on how his country of poets & thinkers had so quickly turned into a collective of corrupt lying cowards & criminals (sound familiar?), & he came up with a 'Theory of Stupidity'.
Bonhoeffer argued that stupid people are more dangerous than evil ones. This is because while we can protest against or fight evil people, against stupid ones we are defenceless — reason & rationality fall on deaf ears. Stupidity is not related to educational attainment.
Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of good than malice, because “one may protest against evil; it can be exposed & prevented by the use of force - against stupidity we are defenceless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here. Reasons fall on deaf ears.”
Facts that contradict a stupid person’s prejudgment simply need not be believed & when they are irrefutable, they're just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. The stupid person is self-satisfied &, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack.
For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with stupid people than with a malicious one. Think of the power of conspiracy theories in recent years.
If we want to know how to get the better of stupidity, he argued, we must seek to understand its nature.
This much is certain, Bonhoeffer claimed: stupidity is in essence not an intellectual defect but a moral one.
There are human beings who are remarkably agile intellectually, yet stupid, & others who are intellectually dull, yet anything but stupid.
The impression one gains is not so much that stupidity is a congenital defect but that, under certain circumstances, people are made stupid or rather, they allow this to happen to them. People who live in solitude manifest this defect less frequently than individuals in groups.
And so for Bonhoeffer, it seemed that stupidity is perhaps less a psychological than a sociological problem: it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power, be it of a political or religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity.
It's almost as if there is a sociological-psychological law where to thrive, a powerful individual needs the stupidity of the masses.
Of course, 'the masses' have been repeatedly dismissed as a stupid 'bewildered herd' for centuries, but Bonhoeffer's insight is different.
For Bonhoeffer, the process is not that particular human capacities, such as intellect, suddenly fail, but instead, under the overwhelming impact of rising power, humans 'are deprived of their inner independence' &, more or less consciously, give up an autonomous position.
More recent research into conformity shows how people have a tendency to adapt beliefs & behaviours in order to fit in to specific groups - even if those behaviours & beliefs are immoral or demonstrably incorrect. Leaders know & exploit this.
The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us from the fact that they are not independent. In conversation with them, one feels that one is dealing not at all with them as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, & the like that have taken possession of him.
Divided people are malleable.
Bonhoeffer says they are 'under a spell', 'blinded, misused, & is abused in his very being'. And having thus become 'a mindless tool', the stupid person will also be capable of any evil – incapable of seeing that it is evil.
“Against stupidity we have no defence. Neither protests nor force can touch it. Reasoning is of no use. Facts that contradict personal prejudices can simply be disbelieved — indeed, the fool can counter by criticizing them, & if they are undeniable, they can just be pushed aside"
"So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied. In fact, they can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make them aggressive. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one."
Only an act of liberation, not instruction, can overcome stupidity. Here we must accept that in most cases, a genuine internal liberation becomes possible only when external liberation has preceded it. Until then, we must abandon all attempts to convince the stupid person.
Bonhoeffer helped Jews move to neutral Switzerland. While restrictions were imposed on him, he was still able to continue his work for the resistance movement under cover of employment in Germany’s Military Intelligence Department, which in fact was a centre of the resistance.
Bonhoeffer was arrested & imprisoned by the Nazis on April 5, 1943. Following the failure of the attempt on Hitler’s life in July 1944, the discovery of documents linking Bonhoeffer directly to the conspiracy led to his further interrogation & execution.
Stupidity facilitates the process of the capture of society. People are suckers for simple explanations for complex problems, which offer “solutions” & scapegoats. Whoever doesn’t conform to the standard orthodoxy becomes the “other”, an enemy to be destroyed.
Tell a story often enough & loudly enough on as many platforms as possible, & people will believe it.
“Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility. The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children”- Bonhoeffer.
Allow me to spell out some of the undeniably uncanny parallels between the recent rise of the @Conservatives in modern day Britain, & the rise of the Nazis in 1930s Germany:
Reform UK’s slick, stage-managed launch of a Christian Fellowship in St Michael’s Church is not some harmless Christmas-season publicity stunt. It is a clear and brazen step towards the Trumpification of UK politics, where religion is weaponised as a tool for cultural warfare and political mobilisation.
This is not organic Christian revival. It’s strategic political engineering.
Behind this development sit figures who have spent years trying to inject a US-style fusion of right-wing politics and religious identity into British political culture:
• Paul Marshall
A billionaire media financier with a clear ideological project: to build a hard-right cultural and religious counter-establishment. Through GB “News”, The |Spectator and UnHerd and other platforms he has amplified narratives about “woke attacks” on tradition, identity, and Christianity. The Islamophobic tweets he liked are disgusting. His network provides the media oxygen for precisely the kind of politicised Christianity on display at the Reform launch.
• James Orr
A Cambridge academic and prominent Anglican conservative intellectual, closely connected to the “post-liberal” movement and hard-right US conservative and Hungarian organisations. Orr openly promotes the idea of restoring Britain’s “Christian identity” through politics — a framing that sits uncomfortably close to the Christian-nationalist rhetoric of the US right. His advisory role to senior Reform figures is a clear sign of the ideological hardening underway.
• Danny Kruger
Long known for advocating a more “muscular” Christian politics, Kruger has repeatedly argued that the UK should explicitly root its laws and social policy in “Judeo-Christian values” - a dog whistle I explain in the next tweet.
This is the British echo of US culture-war evangelicalism: turning religion into a political badge, not a spiritual or moral tradition. His involvement in shaping Reform’s policy direction cements the party’s shift toward faith-infused populism.
• Calvin Robinson
Though no longer in the Church of England, disgraced former GBN presenter and political extremist Robinson remains one of the most prominent voices pushing an aggressive “anti-woke, anti-liberal” form of Christianity in the media — including endorsing narratives that paint inclusive or progressive churches as heretical. His alignment with Reform’s messaging shows how the party is deliberately courting polemical, grievance-driven Christian activism.
Together, these figures represent a new coalition: a British attempt to import the US religious-right model, with all its corrosive social consequences.
Using St Michael’s Cornhill — a church rooted in the conservative evangelical network — as the backdrop for this political spectacle is shocking in a UK context.
This is not merely a “religious event attended by politicians.” It was a political rally held in a church, wrapped in Anglican aesthetics.
The Church of England has historically avoided such political entanglement precisely because it knows how dangerous it is to let a religious institution become a vessel for partisan identity politics.
Britain is not America — but Reform UK wants to change that
What we are seeing is the deliberate construction of a political identity rooted in far-right themes lurching toward a contemporary form of Christofascism:
grievance Christianity
nostalgia for a mythic “Christian Britain”
hostility to minorities and multiculturalism
anti-LGBTQ+ theology rebranded as “family values”
anti-immigrant populism framed as moral duty
and a narrative of cultural siege identical to the US evangelical right
It is the Trump playbook, translated into British idiom.
This is disturbing, because once a political movement fuses religious identity with national identity, democratic debate changes: Opponents are no longer wrong — they are heretical. Policies are no longer argued — they are sanctified. Compromise becomes betrayal. And politics becomes a zero-sum culture war.
Britain has largely avoided this polarising poison. Reform UK is now trying to inject it directly into the bloodstream of national politics.
Reform UK’s “Christian Fellowship” is not about faith. It is the public unveiling of a British Christian-nationalist project — backed by wealthy ideologues, amplified by culture-war media, and borrowing heavily from the most divisive elements of the US right.
It is a serious warning sign of where Reform UK intends to take the country: toward a politics defined by religious grievance, cultural division, and the erosion of the pluralistic norms that have protected Britain from the worst excesses of American political extremism.
How have populist UK politicians and Britain’s right-wing press and broadcasters got away with repeating — day after day, year after year — the brazenly false and wildly misleading claim that we live in a “high-welfare, high-tax” country?
The claim that Britain is a “high-welfare, high-tax” country is a shameless lie—brazenly false—as OECD and OBR data consistently show: the UK's tax take is ~36% of GDP (mid-table globally, and well under the EU average of 40.5%).
The UK's total tax take of 36% is far under France's 45% or Denmark's 46%. Welfare benefits spending (including state pensions) is a modest ~11% of GDP—among the lowest in the OECD, well below the EU average of 17.5%, and just under half that of France (20.5%) and Italy (20%).
Not only has Nigel Farage shamelessly normalized far right discourse, but Reform UK have welcomed a new generation of young, radicalised, Andrew Tate fanboys who think it's acceptable to spread divisive bigoted lies and disinformation, and to make crass bigoted 'jokes'.
Joseph Boam is a radicalised 22-year-old Tate fanboy who started out as a Tory, running as a district councillor, then switching to Reform UK in 2024 and becoming a councillor in May 2025 representing the Whitwick division on Leicestershire County Council for the Reform UK party.
A former KFC worker, who has worked with his dad on sheds and property renovation, despite his total lack of any relevant experience or knowledge of the area, he was appointed Council deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care—which ispatently absurd.
Across the West, figures such as Trump, JD Vance, Farage, Johnson, Tice, Kruger, and Lowe helped normalise far-right populist rhetoric within mainstream politics. Their appeal is anti-elite—yet they themselves embody the privilege they claim to challenge.
A multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto—digital tokens hiding users’ identities—has enabling “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
In 2023, the hedge fund co-founded by GB "News" owner Paul Marshall, who employs 60% of anti-Net Zero Reform UK's MPs, had £1.8 BILLION invested in fossil fuel firms.
Harborne (who has Thai citizenship under the name 'Chakrit Sakunkrit) also makes money from fossil fuels.
I and countless others are sick to death of the billionaire-funded Reform UK propaganda machine, GB “News”, and their decontextualised ‘facts’ that would make Goebbels blush.
Let’s examine the claim that “one quarter of foreign sex offenders come from just five countries”.
Yes, the raw data comes from a genuine Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison census, but the way it’s being weaponised is deeply misleading.
The statistic sounds explosive, and deliberately so: a factoid engineered to sound like a revelation of hidden danger.
The right-wing information pipeline: a cherry-picked fragment of official data stripped of context, laundered through an opaquely funded “think tank” that isn't a think tank, amplified by billionaire-funded media, and weaponised by opportunistic politicians for electoral gain.