You may not have heard of German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
His involvement in a plot to overthrow Adolf Hitler led to his imprisonment & execution, & his thoughts on the causes & dangers of stupidity are fascinating, & imho, once again extremely relevant.
Bonhoeffer grew up amid the academic circles of the University of Berlin, where his father, Karl Bonhoeffer, was a professor of psychiatry & neurology. His father also was one of the most prominent psychiatrists to oppose the T4 (euthanasia) Program initiated by Hitler in 1939.
From 1923 to 1927 Dietrich Bonhoeffer studied theology at the universities of Tübingen & Berlin. His doctoral thesis combined a sociology & theology & he later traced the influence of Kantian transcendental philosophy & ontology on Protestant & Catholic theologies.
With the rise of the Nazis from 1933, Bonhoeffer was involved in protests against the regime, especially its anti-Semitism. He served as pastor in London (1933–35), but became a leading spokesman for the Confessing Church, the centre of German Protestant resistance to the Nazis.
Bonhoeffer’s involvement became increasingly political after 1938, when his brother-in-law introduced him to a group seeking Hitler’s overthrow. In 1939 Bonhoeffer considered taking refuge in the US but returned after two weeks to “share the trials of this time with my people.”
Arrested & imprisoned, Bonhoeffer reflected on how his country of poets & thinkers had so quickly turned into a collective of corrupt lying cowards & criminals (sound familiar?), & he came up with a 'Theory of Stupidity'.
Bonhoeffer argued that stupid people are more dangerous than evil ones. This is because while we can protest against or fight evil people, against stupid ones we are defenceless — reason & rationality fall on deaf ears. Stupidity is not related to educational attainment.
Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of good than malice, because “one may protest against evil; it can be exposed & prevented by the use of force - against stupidity we are defenceless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here. Reasons fall on deaf ears.”
Facts that contradict a stupid person’s prejudgment simply need not be believed & when they are irrefutable, they're just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. The stupid person is self-satisfied &, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack.
For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with stupid people than with a malicious one. Think of the power of conspiracy theories in recent years.
If we want to know how to get the better of stupidity, he argued, we must seek to understand its nature.
This much is certain, Bonhoeffer claimed: stupidity is in essence not an intellectual defect but a moral one.
There are human beings who are remarkably agile intellectually, yet stupid, & others who are intellectually dull, yet anything but stupid.
The impression one gains is not so much that stupidity is a congenital defect but that, under certain circumstances, people are made stupid or rather, they allow this to happen to them. People who live in solitude manifest this defect less frequently than individuals in groups.
And so for Bonhoeffer, it seemed that stupidity is perhaps less a psychological than a sociological problem: it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power, be it of a political or religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity.
It's almost as if there is a sociological-psychological law where to thrive, a powerful individual needs the stupidity of the masses.
Of course, 'the masses' have been repeatedly dismissed as a stupid 'bewildered herd' for centuries, but Bonhoeffer's insight is different.
For Bonhoeffer, the process is not that particular human capacities, such as intellect, suddenly fail, but instead, under the overwhelming impact of rising power, humans 'are deprived of their inner independence' &, more or less consciously, give up an autonomous position.
More recent research into conformity shows how people have a tendency to adapt beliefs & behaviours in order to fit in to specific groups - even if those behaviours & beliefs are immoral or demonstrably incorrect. Leaders know & exploit this.
The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us from the fact that they are not independent. In conversation with them, one feels that one is dealing not at all with them as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, & the like that have taken possession of him.
Divided people are malleable.
Bonhoeffer says they are 'under a spell', 'blinded, misused, & is abused in his very being'. And having thus become 'a mindless tool', the stupid person will also be capable of any evil – incapable of seeing that it is evil.
“Against stupidity we have no defence. Neither protests nor force can touch it. Reasoning is of no use. Facts that contradict personal prejudices can simply be disbelieved — indeed, the fool can counter by criticizing them, & if they are undeniable, they can just be pushed aside"
"So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied. In fact, they can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make them aggressive. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one."
Only an act of liberation, not instruction, can overcome stupidity. Here we must accept that in most cases, a genuine internal liberation becomes possible only when external liberation has preceded it. Until then, we must abandon all attempts to convince the stupid person.
Bonhoeffer helped Jews move to neutral Switzerland. While restrictions were imposed on him, he was still able to continue his work for the resistance movement under cover of employment in Germany’s Military Intelligence Department, which in fact was a centre of the resistance.
Bonhoeffer was arrested & imprisoned by the Nazis on April 5, 1943. Following the failure of the attempt on Hitler’s life in July 1944, the discovery of documents linking Bonhoeffer directly to the conspiracy led to his further interrogation & execution.
Stupidity facilitates the process of the capture of society. People are suckers for simple explanations for complex problems, which offer “solutions” & scapegoats. Whoever doesn’t conform to the standard orthodoxy becomes the “other”, an enemy to be destroyed.
Tell a story often enough & loudly enough on as many platforms as possible, & people will believe it.
“Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility. The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children”- Bonhoeffer.
Allow me to spell out some of the undeniably uncanny parallels between the recent rise of the @Conservatives in modern day Britain, & the rise of the Nazis in 1930s Germany:
A multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto—digital tokens hiding users’ identities—has enabling “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
In 2023, the hedge fund co-founded by GB "News" owner Paul Marshall, who employs 60% of anti-Net Zero Reform UK's MPs, had £1.8 BILLION invested in fossil fuel firms.
Harborne (who has Thai citizenship under the name 'Chakrit Sakunkrit) also makes money from fossil fuels.
I and countless others are sick to death of the billionaire-funded Reform UK propaganda machine, GB “News”, and their decontextualised ‘facts’ that would make Goebbels blush.
Let’s examine the claim that “one quarter of foreign sex offenders come from just five countries”.
Yes, the raw data comes from a genuine Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison census, but the way it’s being weaponised is deeply misleading.
The statistic sounds explosive, and deliberately so: a factoid engineered to sound like a revelation of hidden danger.
The right-wing information pipeline: a cherry-picked fragment of official data stripped of context, laundered through an opaquely funded “think tank” that isn't a think tank, amplified by billionaire-funded media, and weaponised by opportunistic politicians for electoral gain.
In the September 2025 @SkyNews Immigration Debate, chaired by Trevor “Muslims are not like us” Phillips, Reform UK’s head of policy Zia Yusuf made a series of inaccurate and highly misleading claims about migration, and more recently, on @BBCNewsnight, about social housing.
These assertions are easily disproved with publicly available data, but often go largely unchallenged on air, despite being about some of the most sensitive and polarised issues in politics.
Yusuf started by claiming that UK net migration “last year” was “about a million.”
When a newspaper repeatedly publishes misleading, distorted, or outright inaccurate stories, the public expects independent regulators to step in.
What if I told you the editor responsible for these stories is now in charge of writing the very rules that govern press ethics?
Privately educated Chris Evans, editor of The Daily Telegraph since 2014, has—since January 2024—simultaneously served as Chair of the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice Committee, the body that drafts, reviews, and rewrites the ethical rulebook that the UK press is meant to follow.
Evans holds this regulatory role at a time when his own paper is producing more factual corrections and clarifications than almost any other major UK outlet — with an overwhelming concentration in politically weaponised right-wing themes.
The BBC isn’t perfect — but it’s ours. As coordinated attacks on its independence intensify, I warn that if we don’t defend it now, we may lose more than a broadcaster — we may lose a cornerstone of British democracy...
As a long-time critic of the @BBC, let me spell it out: what we’re seeing right now isn’t organic outrage — it’s a sophisticated coordinated campaign by ideological enemies and commercial competitors to undermine the BBC’s independence and funding.
If you can’t see that, you’re being played — and that’s exactly the point.
Let’s start with Michael Prescott, author of the dodgy dossier leaked exclusively to The Telegraph, who is a PR man and former political editor at Murdoch’s Sunday Times.
Growing numbers of people are angry and disillusioned with the political establishment.
Desperate voters are easy prey for manipulative populists—as they were in Germany in the 1930s.
But the problem isn't immigrants or religious minorities. It's always wealth distribution.
The story of wealth in Britain over the past eight decades since WWII is not one of ‘the invisible hand’, but of deliberate policy choices—choices that once built one of the most equal society in modern history, but now sustain one of the most unequal in the developed world.
Data tracking wealth distribution from 1945 to 2025 reveal a striking U-shaped curve: a rapid reduction in wealth inequality after World War II, making Britain one of the most equal countries on earth by the mid 1970s, followed by an unbroken rise.