MetaPool is the first liquid staking solution on @NEARProtocol
By staking your $NEAR, it allows you to get liquid stNEAR to use it in DeFi as collateral or to provide liquidity while you are earning staking rewards with a ~10.77% APY
1/x
📓 How does liquid staking work?
1. Deposit $NEAR into MetaPool 2. Receive stNEAR (staked-NEAR) 3. MetaPool distributes your tokens across validators 4. Rewards accumulate in the form of appreciated stNEAR value 5. Use stNEAR in DeFi applications
@FinanceOin allows you to mint their stablecoin $nUSDO by backing it with stNEAR
5/x
3⃣ Provide liquidity
- stNEAR - NEAR directly in the MetaPool app for 15.88% APY
- stNEAR - wNEAR in @finance_ref for 19.17% APR
- stNEAR - xTRI on @trisolarislabs for 81% APR
- stNEAR - META on @finance_ref for 65% APY
You can of course combine several strategies
6/x
🪙 The $META token
$META is the native governance token and in Phase III there will be a dividend-pool that will allow $META owners to burn $META to obtain stNEAR 🔥
7/x
🌀Allocation
Max supply = 1B
Founders: 30%
Team & advisors: 2.6%
Investors: 10%
Venture rounds: 10%
Community & treasury: 57.4%
*The Meta team hasn't made any pre-sale before the launch so the entire project was funded by the founders
As you can see the Mcap/TVL ratio for Lido is pretty small but $META is undervalued by a factor of x4.43 in comparison to $LDO
With only $133M in TVL and $NEAR popularity growing, we can expect more use cases for stNEAR which will boost Metapool's TVL
10/x
Maybe you can use stNEAR to mint $USN & earn 20% APR. That'd massively boost Metapool's TVL
Due to (1) $NEAR narrative, (2) only liquid staking solution & future TVL growth, (3) comparison with $LDO and (4) use case speculation, I think $META is highly undervalued at < $2M
11/x
If Metapool captures $1B TVL and $META's Mcap / TVL = $LDO's ratio of 0.06 --> $META should have a Mcap of $60M and a price of $3.15 per token
Even with supply increasing, (META is inflationary due to incentive rewards) I don't see a scenario where $META can't do a x10
12/x
A thread on Portfolio Management, Execution, & Psychology to level up your game.
8 mental frameworks to cut through the noise and become a sharper, more focused, and structured trader 🧵
1. Take The 100% Cash Test
To optimize your portfolio allocation, at least to the best of your ability, ask yourself this critical question:
—If your portfolio were to reset to 100% USDT today, would you choose to reallocate funds exactly into the same positions you currently hold?—
The answer for most people is probably not. Yet, many struggle to act. Why? Because of these psychological barriers:
• The Sunk Cost Fallacy
• Emotional Attachment
• Fear Of Being Wrong
The Sunk Cost Fallacy is the cognitive bias where people continue to invest time, money, or energy into something simply because they've already invested in it, even when it's no longer logical (this can also apply to relationships, projects, etc).
In trading, this means holding onto underperforming positions because you've already "spent so much" on them—whether financially or emotionally—rather than cutting losses and reallocating to better opportunities.
Ask yourself the question. If the answer is no, you need to act.
It can feel overwhelming at first, but start small, with 1 position: ask yourself if you would buy that exact amount of that token today. Then go with a 2nd one.
Selling is emotionally difficult because it feels like closing the door on potential. But clinging to positions based on hope or fear leads to stagnation and poor judgment.
2. Maintain a Structured Portfolio
Clear categories for better management:
• Core Positions: High conviction plays; you should be able to handle the violent swings.
It doesn't necessarily mean you need to hold long term, as opportunity cost is very expensive in this market with aggressive rotations, but you'd be lying to yourself if you think you can time every single move. Believe in something.
• Trading Positions: Short- to medium-term opportunities meant to capture specific trends or price movements. Allows for more flexibility: faster rotations and tighter invalidations.
Trading style might different for everyone—this isn't referred to a perps account. I can buy an onchain play, swing it for 4x from $5m to $20m, and move on. And I won't care it goes higher later, but that's only cause I predetermined my mind to understand the type of trade I was taking.
If I expected it to hit $1B (eg. due to uniqueness), it would go to Core Positions and I'd be okay when I roundtrip 50% as I understand that such a volatility is the price for outsized returns.
Mixing these two often leads to confusion and emotional decisions. By separating them, you gain clarity about the purpose of each position, avoiding regrets.
1/ Introducing #BasedAI Creatures: a Digital Form of Living AI Agents.
This might be the closest we've come to AGI in crypto—a fusion of Cellular Automata and LLMs 🧵
2/ So, what exactly are Creatures?
"A self-organizing colony that combines cellular automata, quantum coherence, and LLMs, to explore emergent collective intelligence through cellular agents that think, plan, and evolve in a multi-dimensional space."
A lot to unpack here.
3/ Let's start with Cellular Automata (CA).
They’re mathematical frameworks for modeling complex systems, and often used to simulate life-like behaviors.
Think of them as grids of cells where:
• Each cell follows simple rules to change states.
• These rules depend on neighboring cells.
• Over time, patterns emerge from their interactions and cells evolve into more complex organisms.
- Deployment on @arbitrum in June
- Partnership with @traderjoe_xyz (hinted)
- $LVL / $LGO OFT tokens powered by @LayerZero_Labs w/ fully cross-chain yield aggregation
- @GMDprotocol to build delta-neutral vaults for LLP tranches (+ $LGO ?)
Chart looks pumpy here
$GLP yield has dropped to 5.7% APR as TVL isn't being utilized. $GMX has more TVL than it needs
$LVL LLPs tranches are doing 38%, 127%, & 209% in BSC (only fees)
I think it's inevitable that some GLP liquidity migrates to Level to seek higher yields
When $GNS moved to Arbi, both TVL and volume skyrocketed
Level is deploying on Arbitrum in a time when $GLP yield is quite low, so I expect it to attract a lot of TVL (and users - another criticism point for Level)
Gains proved themselves in Polygon, Level did it in BNB
There is something that took me some time to master. Still not 100% there, tbh, but in the right path.
We tend to increase size as the narrative becomes more & more obvious. And we're shy at the beginning, just in case. High risk, right?
2/ We have to do the opposite. Go hard initially and take some off the table as the narrative becomes more obvious
It seems counterintuitive. As human beings we have a cognitive bias to feel safer once we're comfortable, and we're comfortable when everyone is on the same trade.
3/ But this is extremely important to take into account in a pvp market. When everyone agrees with you, where is the next money coming from?
Especially in a market that is not receiving new fresh money.