Wow. That must be some valuable intelligence data being purchased from Neustrar.
2/
3/ Yup, Neustar sure did Ga Tech visability....
4/ THIS is why the Alfa Bank/EOP scams were so bad: The amount of info these folks have access to, which with Enhanced Attribution can uncover A LOT, is mindboggling. Used for good, can destroy evil. Used for evil, will destroy trust needed to use for good.
5/ Without comment:
6/ Note the "IP Geolocation data". From Neustar to GA Tech.
7/ I bet Manos is an amazing professor (I mean that sincerely). Great explanation--also why Joffe was soooo key to Alfa Bank hoaz:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🚨🚨Trump Administration files response in opposition to Preliminary Injunction in Planned Parenthood case. The Court already entered a blatantly improper TRO. 1/
3/ New York and several other leftist states sued Department of Education, challenging reduction in forces & Dept of Ed's implementation of Trump policy provisions. Lower court entered injunction mandating rehiring & barring executing Trump's EO.
I'm thinking I may have an idea who some of the State Department employees laid off are...remember those in the "Global Engagement Center" pushing censorship of American media outlets under guise of fighting foreign disinformation? Remember Biden Administration pretending . . .
2/ to shutter GEC after Congress cut off funding but instead moving them to a "Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Hub ('R/FIMI Hub')."
3/ Well, late last week, in a little noticed court filing, State Department stated this about the new disinformation Hub:
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: California judge enters TRO against ICE actions. OMgosh...I so called it...it is an "obey the law injunction" that is worthless!
2/ BUT this is different and it complete bullshit!
3/ Here's my earlier thread where I predicted this "follow the law" worthless injunction. (The training requirements/and documentation is entirely different).
🚨Trump is appealing district court's refusal to discharge Preliminary Injunction related to passport sex designations. Trump asked it to be discharged based on recent SCOTUS decision re bars on puberty blockers...stay with me, I'll explain. 1/
2/ In deciding if a law is constitutional, a court has to decide what standard to review the law with, i.e. how carefully to review it. The district court applied "intermediate scrutiny" in deciding if gov't had grounds to limit to sex M/F. SCOTUS then said no, you only use rational basis scrutiny which is easy to pass.
3/ Under correct standard, then Trump Administration has a rationale basis to require passports to designate a person's actual sex, and therefore the court should discharge the injunction. The court refused because . . . wait for it. . . the President hates transgenders.