Ok so this is actually quite a common thing. It's 'intrusive thoughts', and it's invariably a harmless, sometimes even helpful, phenomenon. It's often just the sign of a human brain operating as normal. That said, things can go wrong.
One particularly useful power of the human brain is its ability to create simulations and scenarios. i.e. we have a powerful imagination
But it's not used solely for fantastical stuff; a lot of the time we use it to model scenarios of everyday things that might/could happen
/2
Basically, our brain is pretty much constantly coming up with hypotheticals. "What if this happened?" "What if that occurred?" "What if I did this?" "What if they did that?" etc.
This helps shape, guide, and reinforce our decision making and behaviour
Some contend that this is the default state of the human brain. A human brain, with nothing specific to do other than exist, will essentially daydream about things that might/could happen. It's the role of the 'default network'.
Basically, coming up with random 'What if's is something the human brain does automatically. A lot of the time, they're pretty mundane, and are there and gone before we're even really aware of them
They're not all like that, though
/5
The thing is, when it comes to creating hypothetical scenarios, the only limit on what they can involve is our brain's understanding of what's actually possible in a particular situation.
And many things that are 'possible' are not exactly 'nice'. Or 'ethical'. Or 'legal'
/6
So, if your brain is constantly churning out random but *feasible* situations and actions you could do, some of those will be... unpleasant. And this has knock-on effects.
/7
Because when you contemplate doing something bad, or wrong, or just weird, you'll have an emotional reaction to it, so that thought 'sticks out', because you won't react emotionally to the more mundane scenarios your brain throws at you.
Hence these thoughts are deemed 'intrusive'. They're jarring, and the emotional reaction they trigger due to their wrongness/unpleasantness means our attention (i.e. more brain resources) is dedicated to them, while more mundane thoughts are far more transient.
/9
Many think this means there's something wrong with them, that their brain randomly produced thoughts that were so 'wrong' by normal standards.
"Why did I think about throwing baby [X] into that [Y] compacter? I must be a secret sociopath!"
That's wrong, though (thankfully)
/10
The fact that you come up with thoughts involving alarming scenarios, *and find them alarming*, is technically the sign of a healthy brain. Or at least two aspects of it working as they should.
/11
The fact that your brain was able to come up with ideas and scenarios that were 'beyond the pale', or even just bizarre, suggests your cognitive ability to creatively simulate and hypothesise is working well.
/12
By the same token, the fact that you found these #IntrusiveThoughts so alarming/disconcerting reveals that your brain's grasp of social norms, self-restraint, acceptable behaviour etc. is also in good working order.
So, it's 'healthy' in two ways.
/13
If it helps, in the past I've compared such intrusive thoughts, and the potent emotional reaction they trigger, to someone exploring an island and finding a wire fence, and tentatively creeping close to it/throwing sticks at it to see if it's electrified.
/14
#IntrusiveThoughts are your brain's way of establishing where the boundaries are.
Brain: "What if I did (X), is that an acceptable thing to add to my behaviour repertoire?"
[Simulates (X)]
[VIOLENTLY NEGATIVE EMOTIONAL REACTION]
Brain: "...OK, won't be doing (X), then"
/15
So that's arguably why intrusive thoughts are so disconcerting, but also not something to worry about in most cases.
However, by definition, not everyone falls under the heading of 'most cases'. And that's where problems arise.
/16
For instance, #IntrusiveThoughts are fine as long as they're fleeting. As long as your brain goes 'OK, won't be doing that', then dismisses it and moves on to something else.
Not everyone's brain does that, though. And that's one of the big issues with OCD.
/17
I've written about the mainstream co-opting, and v unhelpful misunderstanding, of OCD before
And I say that as a neuroscientist who taught psychiatry for 7 years
/20
@IamRichWilson@jordbrookes Plenty of other issues will alter the impact of #IntrusiveThoughts too. For instance, if you've experienced trauma, your brain's perceptions of 'acceptable behaviour' and 'powerful emotions' will be drastically altered as a result.
/21
@IamRichWilson@jordbrookes But, in summary, it's perfectly normal for our brains to cook up wild or unpleasant #IntrusiveThoughts , react to them appropriately, then forget about them.
It's when we *can't* forget about them, that's when something might be amiss.
/22
If you like this sort of explainer about brains and #MentalHealth, I have a book out about this very thing
Right, following on from this thread about #IntrusuveThoughts, a lot of people have commented about embarrassing memories that pop up out of the blue and make them cringe all over again.
That's a different, if related, phenomenon. Here's my understanding of why it happens
First and foremost, it's important to recognise that the fundamentals of the human brain's memory system were laid down looooong ago. Before we were even human. Consciousness and rational thought are far more recent developments, evolutionary-speaking
/2
One upshot of this is that our memory system is often the result of new software running on old hardware.
A lot of the brain is like this, in fairness, and it causes a lot of issues. I *may* have written a book all about it
The more I've thought about this, the more I feel it really boils my p*ss.
It takes everything that decent conscientious science, academic, and investigative writers do (and yeah, I include myself in this), and gleefully spits in our face
It takes most multiple attempts to get just one book published. If they succeed at all. Which the majority don't
IMHO, getting a book published is a privilege that should be respected, not a God given right for you to spew any old shite at a potential readership
/2
And that's doubly true if you're claiming to be imparting important, potentially-life-altering ideas and notions to anyone who might read it. In that case, you should be doubly sure your claims and arguments are solid, backed up by evidence, even if just from a moral POV
/3
@polaleeks@PaulaGhete I'd never paste anyone for asking questions, so don't worry about that.
The issue here is that a great many things are being conflated into one excessive, unhelpful idea, i.e. 'modern tech is bad and is damaging us'. The truth, far as we know, is way more complex
/1
@polaleeks@PaulaGhete First and foremost; yes, phones and social media etc. are 'distracting' in so many ways. They provide us with dozens of things to pay attention to, all of which are constantly updated (novelty makes things more alluring/stimulating), and they're on our person at all times
/2
@polaleeks@PaulaGhete So, it's fair to say that your phone/device will occupy a lot of your attention. Because it will. That's what it's for, and we're instinctively wired to react to the things it offers us.
But that's very different to saying they disrupt/damage our brains/focus etc.
/3
I've now spent a whole week working on my general health and fitness. Seven days of
- No booze
- No snacks
- Eating less meat
- Eating less in general
- Getting to bed earlier
- Daily gym sessions
And you know what? Right now, I feel like absolute sh*t
There are plenty of possible reasons for this, admittedly. My body had a very long time to get used to a specific calorie intake/activity rate, and I've totally thrown it out of whack. Will likely take time to adjust, physiologically and mentally.
But this is all new to me, this whole 'physical exertion' world. So, I'm going to be exploring the science of it, and talking to the experts, to see if they can help me get into better shape by my 40th birthday (July this year)
Me, checking my mentions, and realising the Guardian have published another Johnan Harri article
NB: I tend to deliberately misspell his name on here, because I hear he's a notorious self-searcher. And I still occasionally get his acolytes sending me threats/wildly untrue accusations. Pretty tragic really, but who has the time to deal with that guff
And if anyone's wondering how/why Harri is still readily published by the Guardian despite, you know, everything he's guilty of, then this old thread of mine may shine some light on that
Here's a question that arose via a @distantpod group chat
If stood on a cliff edge/high building, why do otherwise 'normal' people experience the urge to jump off?
Here's one potential neurological explanation
[Yes, it's the first #BrainStuff thread of 2022]
/1
So, our brains understand the world by running a mental model of how it 'works'. It combines all available memories, attitudes, beliefs, assumptions, experiences etc, into one big mental simulation of how everything around us works, or *should* work, based on what we know.
/2
But, as humans have the hefty cognitive power required, we also constantly run simulations of events that *might* happen. We can predict the outcomes of the choices we make, the things we encounter, and so on. We use this to function and survive in the world.
/3