This rush to villainize fossil fuel as though it's not *our* fault we did this, it's that bad old fossil fuel that did it.
If not for the evil of fossil fuels and their corporate sources, we would miraculously by now have carbon free energy enough to piss away on our every whim.
2. I find it offensive. Seriously. We have all the facts staring us in the face.
Lawrence Livermore National Labs does this analysis annually.
This thing is way more important than the new #IPCCReport
3. The boxes on the left margin are sources of the energy we use, real numbers, hard science.
The pink boxes on the right are categories of activities. How much energy, and from whence it came, is in each box.
The orange box in the top middle is a conversion point, where other
4. Prior sources of energy are converted to electricity and where that goes.
All the gray parts are energy lost in the various processes. Under the laws of thermodynamics no process can be 100% energy efficient. None are even close in the real world.
5. Up there at the top of the left hand column are the non-fossil direct sources of energy, with nuclear the largest, producing about 8½ percent of the total input energy.
Next comes wind, at 2¾%, then hydro, big dams, at about 2½.
The pink boxes are where all the lines end.
One hundred percent, all, of the energy we produce and consume, what I refer to as throughput, is to power those activities.
Almost 30% of the total energy is used for transportation.
This is US only, not global.
Slightly less of our energy goes into industry than transportation
7. So transportation and industry, those two classes of activities, consume over half the fossil fuels.
You want to halt fossil fuel use?
Which of those two pink boxes to you choose to shrink?
That's over half your fossil fuels.
That chart is all the energy we are capable
8. Of bringing to bear on our activities. There is no magic spigot we can turn on to take the place of the well over a third of our total energy throughput annually.
And don't even *think* electric. You see the big orange box? That's where a vast quantity of fossil fuels are run
through heat engines, which are between ⅔ and ¾ energy loss transactions -
Fossil Fuels.
Which pink box do you want to shrink, and how much?
That's where the fossil fuels went. Into the pink boxes.
Our homes barely break 10% of the total.
We can turn down this and turn off that
10. we've got all these people screaming INSULATION and - if we just quit heating and lighting our homes *at all* we'd still have 89% of our current fossil fuel demand.
Transportation and manufacturing.
So what are we doing?
We're building new highways and manufacturing renoobles
11. I've been screaming SLOW DOWN for years, and it's like this giant nationwide yawn 🥱
That's almost ⅓ of our total fossil fuel use, y'all.
Slowing would reduce it.
This is physics. It is incontrovertible.
A nationwide 30 mph speed limit would make *a big* difference in fossil
12. fuel use.
I find it offensive that people whose credentials and employment proclaim them to be Scientists with a capital S, screaming about fossil fuels.
We. Know. Where. It. Goes.
Pick. The. One. To. Shrink.
I've been voting for the speed one for years. Ignore me. Pick one.
13. The pink boxes are everything. They're where the fossil fuels go. The only way to keep the fossil fuels from going is to turn down or off some specific demand.
Shrink the pink boxes.
Or STFU.
14. Electrify everything.
OK, Orange box. Right now we're using 100% of the output electricity from the aggregate of fossil and other inputs to the left of the orange box.
All the new electric cars go on the orange line coming out.
It is what all the fossil fuel turned into.
15. Of the available new sources of energy to feed into the orange box - energy is the original zero sum game, TANSTAAFL. You want more out, put more in.
It's a tossup between natural methane and coal which power more new electric plants over the next few years. Renoobles ain't.
15. Presumably we're going to transfer the entire transportation pink box - well, theoretically (in somebody's dreams) *all* the pink boxes
Are going to get *all* their input energy out of the orange output line from the orange box.
The pink boxes, we are assured, will never have
16. to shrink, nay, indeed they can all grow forever, out of the magic carbon-free Pure Clean Energy flowing out of the orange box, and in this dream, all the pretty colored boxes on the left are magically gone,
17. and the trickle of warm piss coming out of purple box, and the yellow box, will through an act of Technological Prowess grow to provide all the power, going into all the pink boxes, all the Power, all the Sacred Technology,
17. That trickle will expand to replace the Sacred Green, the Mordor Black, the sky blue - the light green is a net loss and only in there for Grassley - all that wonderful, colorful Energy, to power all the pink boxes - and no fossil fuels.
18. There is never a time when someone says, "I think I'd like to use some fossil fuel today. How can I do that?"
There is one, and only one, route, or technology, or system, or step, whatever you want to call it - there is one and only one way to reduce fossil fuel use today:
19. Start at the pink boxes. Observe each box and say, "How can I accomplish the things which we need accomplished, within this box, on less energy?
In almost all cases the answer will be, slow one or more processes.
It's either that or find processes we can entirely halt.
20. As far as I can see no credentialed climate professional who is willing to get arrested for protesting fossil fuels is willing to host a public discussion on means to attain his/her stated goal of reduced fossil fuel now today.
21. We know where it's going. Which action shall we shrink?
We are not, scientists notwithstanding, going to repeal the laws of thermodynamics no matter how inconvenient they may be.
My box to shrink is transportation. What's yours?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When I post about my intention to vote for Vice President Harris for President this election, I get one of 3 basic packaged responses.
1: Don't you care about genocide?
2: Good work, so am I, For The Climate!
3: How can you support a Big Party Professional Politician candidate?
2. Yes, I care about genocide.
There is no remotely electable candidate who will do jack shit about it.
I regret that. Deeply.
I feel that we are currently supporting the most brutal, aggressive, murderous regime and nation, except maybe Russia, in the developed world. Israel.
3. This week I have had people try to convince me that Don Old Trump is a "peace" candidate.
Har har.
Don Old Trump is a puppet candidate. If Putin wants us to stop supporting Israel Tmurp might, but that's no reason to elect him.
We'll be killing somebody. We always do. NMF.
So, on the one hand we've got this.
On the other hand we have demands to fix the roads.
Which takes, regardless of what somebody may have told you, lots of time, lots of fossil fuels, and lots of concrete.
2. It is a simple fact that building the interstate and other highways, building the cars which ran on them, and running said cars on said highways, were all major contributors to global heating and the resultant extreme weather events
Building them back will make it worse faster
3. We have a swath across the southeastern US where segments of that concrete, high speed infrastructure are gone.
Meanwhile, in the western US, we have so many wild donkeys that we're killing them for the cattle.
Unlike many wild horses, wild donkeys are trainable.
I've done it.
Leon wants me to get very fried.
Or berry dyed.
Or something. Comes with a blue dot with a white check in it, almost universally known as a "blue check."
Which when you think about how much more interested America is with speed than quality, makes sense.
2. I was verified for a year, not the old real verified, I asked but Twitter said I was a nobody and not worth verifying.
Which, to be fair, wasn't a view unique to them.
But Leon doesn't give two hoots about facts, in fact, facts fuck up his system and are to be deprecated.
3. I didn't get verified because I wanted to be Verified and have a Blue Check. I got verified because I was in an extensive DM conversation, and unless you're verified you can only have X number of DMs per month, and I had exceeded that and felt the need to continue.
So I bribed
1: Unlike most doomers, I believe that we could, if we chose, take specific actions which would reduce the level of ecosystem degradation we do, and in fact we could, over roughly a decade, move from degradation to improvement.
Sadly, this is a distinction without a difference,
2. because there is no societal interest in taking any productive actions.
If we want to reduce emissions, the way to do so is to burn less fossil fuels.
There is no other way.
If we want to reduce non-emissions ecosystem degradation, the way is to reduce mining, paving, cutting.
3. If we want to reduce toxic pollution, the way is to produce less toxins.
If we want to reduce plastic pollution, the way is to produce less plastic.
If we want to reduce PFAS pollution, the way is to produce less PFAS.
I used to write about climate change. I went about 5 years, writing a thread at least 5 days a week.
Although the global ecosystem is massively degraded and losing functions, I believe it still would act towards a restoration of a livable climate for the current biosphere if.
2. If, that is, we would let it.
If we would quit degrading it.
Yes, I am aware that there are over 8 billion of us. As it is today, roughly two billion of us extract and reduce to trash at least 8 to 10 times more resources per unit of time, per person, than the other 6 billion.
3. We have all these excuses. People would starve if they couldn't get from zero to 60 mph in under ten seconds, people would starve if we couldn't commute by personal jet, a thousand miles one way.
It's all bullshit.
The other 6 billion aren't starving. Lots of them are hungry,
So ...
What have I been doing in the earth shattered heat wave?
I bought a new guitar. New to me. Made in 1956. It's a ten string non-pedal steel guitar, and the most fascinating instrument I've ever encountered.
2. I'm consuming resources to operate it.
It's electric.
I have an 8 watt (maximum) Boss Katana Mini amplifier which runs on 6 AA batteries. My Peterson tuner is lithium ion rechargeable.
As kilowatts go it's a fairly low end consumer, but it's all energy.
4. This thing was designed by a man named Elbern H. Alkire, known professionally as Eddie.
Eddie's objective was to create a non-pedal steel guitar which addressed the same playability issues that pedal steels were invented for.
The Alkire Eharp was Betamax to pedal steel's VHS.