GeoConfirmed Profile picture
Apr 11, 2022 52 tweets 26 min read Read on X
The "#Kramatorsk" strike, our third thread.

We managed to geolocate two different launch locations based on 9 GeoConfirmations.

We don't know how long this thread will be and additional information later on will also be placed in this thread, so we number it "xx/"

01/ Image
At least 50 people, including five children, were killed after a missile strike on a railway station in Kramatorsk, eastern Ukraine, that was being used by civilians trying to flee the fighting, Ukrainian officials said Friday.

There were 2 impacts:


02/ Image
So after we confirmed the impacts, we started looking for every sighting of possible launches we found.

And we started GeoConfirming them.

Soon it became clear ALL the launch sightings, we could confirm, came from Russian occupied territory in Donbass region.

Map by @isw.

03/ Image
For this reason we will not post GeoConfirmed sightings. In some occasions we can even guess from wich appartement the footage was made and we do not want to endanger the person who filmed it.

We hope you all will respect this also.

Map from @Liveuamap

04/ Image
We added the direction of the smoke on the map and we concluded 2 possible launch sites:

Sadove (Садове) and between Hirne (Гірне) and Ternove (Тернове)

This is based on the direction from 9 GeoConfirmed locations. Smoke is impacted by wind, so we drew boxes.

05/ Image
For these estimated launch boxes we took in consideration all the GeoConfirmed launches from 07 and 08 April.
Timings = video's with timing in local time (EEST)

The Strike was around 10:30.

"Sadove box":
All 08/04:
10:26
10:26
11:17
t.me/shortDPR/22000

06/
"Ternove box":
07 10:43
07 11:00
07 11:12
07 11:40
08 15:56
08 16:14

Regarding the attack on Kramatorsk, 2 videos of launches appear to have been posted just before or after the impact.



07/
These launch boxes are 101km (Sadove) and 109km (Ternove) away from Kramatorsk.

We can't confirm, by watching the sightings, what was launched, but we will take look if it's even possible with that distance.

08/ Image
In tweet 02/ you could see we used a third yellow marker:
This is where they found the engine of a Tochka-U.



09/
It is confirmed as the engine of Tochka-U by military experts.

9M79-1 = Tochka-U,
the '1' = U version.

Italian TV channel La7 has filmed the 9M79-1. (PIC 3)

More information on the difference:

armyrecognition.com/russia_russian…

militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-191…

10/ ImageImageImage
We did not use the angle of the motor impact to determine the possible launch direction.
Why?

The engine of a Tochka-U separates from the warhead at 2km and freefalls from there. It gets resistance from the weather elements like wind.



11/
"24 MARCH - At 7:45 AM, a Tochka-U SRBM was fired towards the landing ships Saratov, Tsesar Kunikov, and Novocherkassk." reported by @GrangerE04117

Why is this interesting?

You can see the motor flying further and rotating 👇(00.08 - 00.11)



12/
The SS-21 Scarab (Russian name: 9M79 "Tochka") is a Russian-made short-range ballistic missile.
The Tochka-U is an improved version of the Tochka using a new missile propellant to increase the range to 120 km and an improved CEP (Circular Error Probable) to less than 95 m.

13/ Image
Components:

- 9P129: Launcher unit
- 9T218: transporter loader (TL)
- 9T222 (9T238): transport vehicle
- 9V819: automated checkup and testing vehicle
- 9V844: maintenance vehicle
- 9F370: ammunition equipment set
- 9Ya234 missile and 9Ya warhead containers

14/ Image
A new 3-axle amphibious chassis BAZ-5921 and BAZ-5922 were a future development of the first range of machines 5937/5939 and were made for a new rocket complex. It called 9K79 "Point" and consisted of two main systems - launcher 9P129 and loader 9T218.
trucksplanet.com/catalog/model.…
15/
Point = Tochka-U.
The BAZ-5921 is developed ONLY for the Tochka-U.
Versions with another goal were only prototypes.

Max speed = 120km in 136 sec.

Pictures by @ArmyRecognition and
sixmania.fr/en/baz-5921-ch…

16/ ImageImageImageImage
Our estimated launch areas are within range for a Tochka-U.

But does Russia is still operating the Tochka-U?

Short answer: Yes.
Long answer 👇

Russia announced it would replace them with Iskander. This also means they definitely have them in storage...

17/ Image
28 NOVEMBER 2016: "Missile, Rocket and Tube Artillery Corps will fully replace the Tochka-U (NATO reporting name: SS-21 Scarab-B) tactical ballistic missile system with the Iskander-M (SS-26 Stone) complex by 2020."

armyrecognition.com/november_2016_…

18/
But didn't replaced them all, on the contrary:

"In 2020, the newly formed 47th missile and 238th artillery brigades were deployed on the territory of the military garrison of the city of Korenovsk (Krasnodar Territory)."

Source: bmpd.livejournal.com/4379253.html

19/ Image
On February 20, 2021, an open day was held, which presented samples of weapons from units of the Korenovsky garrison:

The 47th missile brigade is armed with the 9K79 Tochka-U missile system.

kuban24.tv/item/v-korenov…

20/
The 47th missile and 238th artillery brigades were formed as part of the 8th combined arms army.

09 MAY 2021: Korenovsk-parade.

Watch minute 2.49 👇



and:



21/
The 8th combined arms army is fighting in Ukraïne:

"AFU Air Force destroys advanced command post of 8th Combined Arms Army of Southern Military District of Russia at airfield in Chornobayivka – Arestovych"
(General was killed)

interfax.com.ua/news/general/8…

22/
Report from @TheStudyofWar march 19.

"Russian forces concentrated considerable combat power around Mariupol drawn from the 8th Combined Arms Army to the east and from the group of Russian forces in Crimea to the west"

understandingwar.org/backgrounder/r…

23/
Report from @TheStudyofWar April 08, day of the attack.

"Russia’s 8th Combined Arms Army (operating in Donbas) is equipped with the missile."

--> The Russian unit in the area of our estimated launch sites has the Tochka-U.

understandingwar.org/backgrounder/r…

24/
06 MARCH: @CITeam_en concluded that Russia used the Tochka-U in the war:

"Russia is now using older Tochka-U missile launchers against Ukraine, as seen in Desnyanka, 40 km from the border with Belarus."



25/
Other Sightings:

18 MAR:
"New batch of Tochka-U tactical ballistic missiles was brought to Belarus.

Today at 14:12 (Minsk time), Russian An-124 Ruslan heavy cargo aircraft landed at the airfield in Machulishchy (Minsk region)."



26/
30 MAR

"A column of Russian equipment with “V” marks was moving from Rechitsa towards Gomel, Belarus.
There were at least 8 Tochka-U, several BTR-82a, about 9 KamAZ trucks, some of which are carrying Tochka-U missiles,..."



27/
31 MAR: Area Gomel, Belarus.

Russian vehicles on train in #Gomel, #Belarus



28/
Additional information:

Tweet 28:

The ones with the plastic roof are 9T218 transporter loader (TL) with spare missiles; (Pic 01) = 4 vehicles visible

The ones with the metal roof are 9P129 Launcher units. (Pic 2) = 2 vehicles visible

29/ ImageImage
Why would Russia use Tochka-U if they have 9K720 Iskander?

Because their Iskender stock is rapidly shrinking due to the fierce Ukrainian resistance...
And they have them, so why not use it...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTR-21_To…

30/
But what about the serial number?

Serial numbers have no value in this:

1: You can easily adjust them
2: Russia has captured several Ukrainian ammunition depots during this war...
So they can perfectly have missiles with Ukrainian serial numbers.



31/
Why Russia attacked Kramatorsk?

An imporant railroad and its a strategic city for Donbass. --> Ukrainian troop movement is also by train.
Russia attacked other railroads and stations on 07 April:
Mentioned here:
t.me/truexanewsua/3…

And here:
ukrinform.ua/rubric-regions…

32/
An other question: why should Ukraine attack Kramatorsk and blame it on Russia?

Russia has already commited a dozen WarCrimes, why would this one make a huge difference that Ukraïne is willing to place their friendship with the West on the line?
Ukraine needs the railroads.

33/ Image
This was Kramatorsk on 07 April 2022:

"Video from #Kramatorsk train station. All the people trapped. Now you understand why mothers write contact details on their children’s bodies."



34/
Did we already mention it was MH17 all over again?

"Kremlin affiliated media first proudly reported the #Kramatorsk massacre, claiming their missile hit an ammunition train that arrived yesterday evening."



35/
Keep in mind: We can't prove that our estimated launch sites are the ones that targetted Kramatorsk, based on this information.

We shared all our information with @bellingcat.

We remain available if necessary and also continue our own GeoConfimed investigations.

36/
And

@DanielBanas_sk, @Nrg8000, @BeMilInterests for the extra help.

Also we want to thank the OSINT community for supporting us and providing us with enough information.

This is a team effort!

Updates wil be placed under this thread with xx/

38/
Please keep in mind that any launch site could have been used for the attack on Kramatorsk:

Not every launch is filmed, on the contrary, and both parties use a lot of missiles.

We wanted to demonstrate that it was possible and Russia has the Tochka-U in use.

39/
Some people are attacking our claim that Russia uses the Tochka, they argue that a BAZ-5921 and a BAZ-5922 can also be used for other euh 'things'.
Wrong.

The BAZ-5921 and BAZ-5922 have been specially developed for using Tochka.



40/
Here you see the launcher: TEL 9P129. (BAZ-5921)

In my very basic and fast drawing (sorry for that) you will see pictures from sightings in Belarus mixed with pictures from Russian military parades.

They match.

Roof = metal with hatches
Cabin is longer. (Wheel)

41/ Image
Here you see the transportation and loading vehicle: RTV 9T218. (BAZ-5922)

Roof = Canope
Cabine = shorter --> before wheel.

Again i mixed pictures from sightings in Belarus with pictures from Russian military parades.

They match.

42/ Image
Normally every TEL 9P129 is accompanied by 2 RTV 9T218 (doctrine)

So let's watch the sighting again:

We count:
4x RTV 9T218
4x TEL 9P129

So not a 1:2 ratio.
But what do we see in the trucks?
5x trucks with 9 missile tubes.



43/
So maybe they had some shortages on RTV 9T218, who knows?

Let's watch the other sighting:

We count:
4x RTV 9T218
2x TEL 9P129

= 1:2 ratio.



44/
Some people claim this could also be an explanation for the sightings.

WRONG

The 1L269 Credo-1S surveillance radar has a different front cabine.

All the pictures seems to be from the same vehicle --> As far as we know it was a prototype.

45/ ImageImage
We we made one mistake in tweet 16:
The BAZ-5921 and the BAZ-5922 is not only made for the Tochka-U (like we said in that tweet) but for all the Tochka versions. But the Tochka-U is the most updated version...



46/
Why would Russia drive around with the 1:2 ratio, empty containers, empty TEL 9P129 and empty RTV 9T218 and even fly them in to Belarus?
🧐

...

So we can definitely assume that this system is operational and they are using it or will use it.



47/
Why the serial number isn't an issue at all.
(Like we stated before)

All missiles with similar serial number were manufactured in the former soviet union in the same plant...



48/
Russian trolls are spreading disinformation on the Kramatorsk strike. An interesting breakdown 👇



49/
"We’ve been able to visually confirm that a banned cluster bomb was used in last week’s attack on Kramatorsk railway station in Ukraine which killed more than 50."



51/
52/

"Cluster munition marks on road near the #Kramatorsk railway station where there was the missile attack on 8 April"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GeoConfirmed

GeoConfirmed Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeoConfirmed

Jul 14
GeoConfirmed announcement.

Please be cautious when sharing information about the assassination attempt on former U.S. President Donald Trump. A lot of misinformation and disinformation is circulating regarding this incident.

GeoLocations:

Estimated location of the shooter: 40.858273, -79.970548
Estimated location of Trump: 40.857139, -79.970870
Estimated location of casualties: 40.856939, -79.970926
Estimated location of crane that is hit: 40.856831, -79.971197
Estimated location of this sniper detachment: 40.857092, -79.970372

An example of widely spread misinformation:
In this video you DON'T see the snipers engaging. The three shots are assessed to be from the shooter. What does not mean this team hasn't engaged the shooter at a later time, it's only not visible in the video claiming they did.

We asked experts and fact checkers their opinion:
Always focus on what you DO see and DO hear in a video.

Observations:

After the first shot Trump is reaching for his ear. Almost the same time Sniper One (With the tripod) is repositioning/taking cover. Also Sniper Two is taking cover. A sniper will not immediately shoot after repositioning: it takes a few seconds to zoom in, adjust scope etc.
Three shots are heard with the same specific sound, all three assessed to be from the shooter.

Another video (Vid 01) emerged where bystanders identify the threat before he starts shooting. At 0:03 you hear three shots. At 0:07 you hear 5 more shots in a fast pace but with the same sound as the first three. Followed with what is assessed as another different type of gun shot.
At 0:16 a witness is describing the shooter to be turning in their direction.
At 0:19 another single different sound what is also assessed as another different type of gunshot, is heard.


In Vid 02 you hear them also identifying the shooter and the same sequence of shots is heard.


In Vid 03 you see the location of casualties.


In Vid 04 you see that a crane is hit (at 0:16) near the location where casualties where reported.


In Vid 05 you see the Sniper Team is still repositioning a fraction before the next 5 shots are heard. Sniper One is still looking over his rifle to assess threat location.


So these are observations.
We asked experts for their opinion what we see here. And the thread written by @LtTimMcMillan seems to be accurate. (Vid 06)

Opinion:

1. Snipers are tasked for very far engagements. The shooter was 125m away. It is very likely the was not in their area of responsibility.

2. Snipers that are using their scope have a narrow field of view. You see that Sniper One is using his scope, probably screening far away/in depth. When trying to identify the treat he had to look over his scope and reposition his rifle, because the treat is likely way closer than expected.

This also means that its impossible to state that this specific detachment failed just based on the footage.
You need to know and understand how they work, what their area of responsibility was, and what the communication was they got, etc...

Read the whole thread by @LtTimMcMillan:


In times like this its advised to follow accounts like @Shayan86 and other fact checkers.

Other examples:

"Major blue-tick accounts are falsely claiming that "Antifa extremist Mark Violets" was the shooter at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania today, who earlier revealed his plan in a YouTube video. The video shows Italian football fan Marco Violi, who has nothing to do with the shooting."


An X user claiming they got the wrong guy.


and lots of other claims.

Conclusion:

Stick to what you hear, see, and know.
Recognize that you may not possess the knowledge to comprehend everything, and it's more beneficial to identify experts and read/listen to their insights on topics beyond your expertise.
Ultimately, a thorough investigation will be necessary to understand what is as close to the truth as possible.

Be mindful of misinformation and disinformation, particularly in these times. The rise of engagement farming has exacerbated this threat to a significant degree.

1/X






All assessed locations:

2/X Image
Our first thread:

(Shooter to Trump distance around 125m)



3/X
Read 11 tweets
Jul 14
GeoConfirmed World.

Location of the what looks like the killed shooter involved in the Trump shooting.

Distance from Former US president Trump around 125m.

Former US president Trump was standing around 40.857139, -79.970870

What is assessed as the killed shooter, on a roof, at 40.858250, -79.970806

GeoLocated by @AKMcKeever, @OAlexanderDK, @RhinozzCode, @FahrettinAltay_ @Faytuks, @GeoRaccoon

Geolocation:


Location:

Sources:



geoconfirmed.org/world/d30f722a…

Read 8 tweets
May 17
GeoConfirmed UKR.

Last night, Ukraine conducted one of its largest drone attacks in the history of this war.

According to various reports, Ukraine used up to 80 drones, identified as 'Liutyi' one-way attack long-range unmanned aircraft, to strike different targets in Novorossiysk, Russia (approximately 350km from the nearest frontline) and the refinery in Tuapse, Russia (approximately 450km from the nearest frontline).

During the attack, which lasted for hours, dozens of drones followed sometimes the same trajectory, without being intercepted by Russian Air Defense, to strike targets inside Russia.

The targeting of Novorossiysk is particularly significant from a strategic perspective because this is the harbor where various ships of the Black Sea fleet have withdrawn to after the strikes on Sevastopol.

Thread with all the geolocated footage.

1/XImage
At night: Russian AD working in Novorossiysk, first explosions reported.

POV: 44.7020191, 37.7828344

GeoLocated by @Grimm_Intel



2/X
Read 35 tweets
Apr 29
GeoConfirmed ISR-PAL. GeoConfirmed Investigation 'Mass graves' - Final.

It has come to our attention that our previous investigation thread did not achieve the desired outcome. For this reason, we have conducted further research and wish to clarify some important points:

Although we had intended to demonstrate that the site was not a new mass grave for 180 individuals recently killed by the IDF, as had been insinuated, we underestimated how our initial thread was subsequently used. We did not provide sufficient context, and we now aim to rectify that.

The fact that Palestinians had to bury their loved ones within the hospital complex, in any available space, is a direct consequence of the surrounding and occupation of the hospital by IDF forces. A significant number of the deaths are also the result of the ongoing conflict.

We want to emphasize that open-source intelligence (OSINT) cannot fully capture the extent of what occurred on the hospital grounds.

After our initial investigation, additional questions arose, prompting us to delve deeper into this matter.

Our first thread:
Our temporary update:


We have been able to geolocate dozens of videos.
To make this information more accessible and easier to follow, we have named the three cemeteries based on their respective locations:

Cemetery South
This cemetery is located south of the road, under the palm trees.

Cemetery North
This cemetery is situated north of the road.

Cemetery East
This cemetery is located in the corner of the area.

By naming the cemeteries according to their geographic locations, we aim to provide a more organised and readable presentation of the findings. This approach eliminates the need to include geolocation proof for every individual video, making the information more concise and easier to comprehend.

We will publish our findings in a timely manner to encourage further thought, discussions and investigations on these matters.
This will be a long thread.
The translations were done by using Google translate and Google image translator.

Special thanks to @MiddleEastBuka, @TwistyCB and @GeoRaccoon for their work. Thanks to specific people from outside the GeoConfirmed network for the advice given.

[Every blue pin is a geolocated video between 22 January and now]

001/X
Image
22 January 2024.

One of the earliest reports we found described the dire situation faced by Palestinians during the ongoing siege, where they were forced to bury their dead inside hospital grounds due to the siege of the hospital by IDF.

Source:

"A number of martyrs were buried within the walls of Nasser Hospital due to the occupation’s siege of the hospital, and the martyrs’ families were unable to bury them in the cemeteries."

002/Xt.me/Ahaamd1985/185…Image
Image
22 January 2024.

Cemetery South.
Source:

The martyrs were buried inside the Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis.

003/Xt.me/Ahaamd1985/186…Image
Read 58 tweets
Apr 22
GeoConfirmed ISR-PAL Investigation.

Palestinians are exhuming bodies from the grounds of the Nasser Medical Complex hospital complex in Khan Younis, Gaza.
This is occurring at the same location where mass graves were dug and burial ceremonies had taken place by Palestinians in recent months. (Proof in this thread)

Footage from Palestinians digging graves/mass graves dated 25 January, 28 January and 03 February while IDF entered the hospital around 15 February.

Quote from
“In the hospital courtyard, civil defence members and paramedics have retrieved 180 bodies buried in this mass grave by the Israeli military." (By Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud)

Conclusion:
This is disinformation by Al Jazeera and others:
This is a known graveyard/mass grave and at least partially dug by Palestinians.
This does not exclude that graves could have been added when the hospital was occupied by Israeli forces.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/21…Image
25 JAN 2024 - Palestinian burials by Palestinian people in Nasser Hospital. (VID 01)

An estimation of 75 graves (3 rows of 25 graves) are visible on this video at the exact place where they claimed to have found a mass grave made by the Israeli military.

31.345841, 34.291887

Source:


t.me/Ahaamd1985/187…
t.me/VBnO4pp1lMzBi/…
Still of the footage in VID 01 showing the source, the date and the estimated 75 graves. Image
Read 25 tweets
Apr 22
GeoConfirmed ISR-PAL Investigation.

Palestinians are exhuming bodies from the grounds of the Nasser Medical Complex hospital complex in Khan Younis, Gaza.
This is occurring at the same location where mass graves were dug and burial ceremonies had taken place by Palestinians in recent months. (Proof in this thread)

Footage from Palestinians digging graves/mass graves dated 25 January, 28 January and 03 February while IDF entered the hospital around 15 February.

Quote from
“In the hospital courtyard, civil defence members and paramedics have retrieved 180 bodies buried in this mass grave by the Israeli military." (By Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud)

Conclusion:
This is disinformation by Al Jazeera and others:
This is a known graveyard/mass grave and at least partially dug by Palestinians.
This does not exclude that graves could have been added when the hospital was occupied by Israeli forces.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/21…Image
25 JAN 2024 - Palestinian burials by Palestinian people in Nasser Hospital. (VID 01)

An estimation of 75 graves (3 rows of 25 graves) are visible on this video at the exact place where they claimed to have found a mass grave made by the Israeli military.

31.345841, 34.291887

Source:


t.me/Ahaamd1985/187…
t.me/VBnO4pp1lMzBi/…
Still of the footage in VID 01 showing the source, the date and the estimated 75 graves. Image
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(