Since the Bucha massacre was made public, Germany has paid ~$1.5B in gas to Russia

Yet 🇩🇪 will still close its nuclear power plants in 2022. Why? I dug up the details. Not pretty.

The only conclusion is that 🇩🇪 would rather kill nuclear than fight Putin & defend Ukraine
1/
What would be the impact of keeping nuclear?

Closing the 3 remaining reactors would increase Russian gas by ~30%
Reopening all the closed reactors would eliminate ALL Russian gas imports

To understand this, we need to understand German gas: where it comes from & how it's used
About 2/3 of Germany's gas is used for heat.

Changing the heat from gas to other sources is very hard. But reducing the demand a bit is doable. Eg, replacing boilers with heat pumps, taxing it more, and asking ppl for an effort.
But the big one that could be affected is electricity generation, which accounts for about 1/3 of all gas consumption.
In 2021, 55% of Germany's gas came from Russia. During the war, it's been able to get that down to 40%.

40% from 🇷🇺~ 35% to electricity

So a small effort in heat reduction + changing all electricity from gas to other sources would completely eliminate gas imports from Russia.
And it's a LOT of money.
Gas is at ~$1/m3
🇩🇪 imports from Russia ~130M m3 of gas a day
That's ~$130M/day

➡️Every week, Germany pays Putin $900M 💸💸💸
Nearly $1.5B since the Bucha massacre was made public
How doable is it to replace the electricity from gas to other sources?

Well, in 2021, 50% of Germany's electricity came from renewables, about 12% from gas, and 10% from nuclear.

Look at that purple (nuclear) vs. gray (gas).
Germany used to generate more electricity from nuclear in the 2000s than the current generation of gas + nuclear.

Put in another way, turning the clock back on nuclear energy would eliminate all gas consumption on electricity, which would eliminate all imports of Russian gas.
So why don't they do it?

In fact, it's not even on the table. The only thing that they put on the table was keeping the current ones open! And even then, they won't do it?

Why?
It took me some digging, but I found the document that the German government used to explain it.

Here is the original, and below a Google translation in English
bmuv.de/fileadmin/Date…

docs.google.com/document/d/1WR…
Side note: the document comes from the Economy and Environment Ministries, both of which are controlled by... the Green Party.

Green is good, but should it be the only factor in the middle of a geopolitical crisis?

Is that what Germany is optimizing for?
OK so what are the reasons they use:
1. It would require changing the law, and maybe even the constitution.
I'm no expert in German politics, but it sounds to me like this is the type of things governments are in a position to promote? Especially in times of crisis?
2. Safety: the reactors would need to pass expedited safety inspections and might not be able to get to state-of-the-art safety.

But the baseline risk of a serious accident is something like 0.001%. What would these inspections do? Reduce it by a further 0.00005%?
Compare that with the reality that Germany is sending hundreds of millions of dollars every day to their blood-thirsty, psychopath neighbor who threatens with nuclear war every time somebody lifts a finger

Yes, of course Germany can take some more time to pass these inspections!
3. Fuel
They fear fuel would run out in Spring 2023 and new fuel would only arrive for Fall 2023.

I fail to understand the problem with that.
I also fail to understand their lack of imagination. Could a gov really not accelerate this?
Where there's a will, there's a way
4. Spare parts
They fear suppliers of spare parts have closed down (no details).
They forget:
• This is the type of pbm you can throw money at
• Ppl who worked in these suppliers are still alive
• The German reactors are nothing unique
5. Personnel
Most workers have retired and new ppl haven't been trained, which would take time.

I kid you not, this is their type of concern: “Argh, I would need to get some people out of retirement and train new people. But it takes so long to train them! Better pay Putin.”
6. Economic considerations
What they say:
"With lack of clarity on spare parts and personnel, how can we commit to a reliable delivery or energy? We can’t be 100% confident."

Lack of clarity? Of course! Then get working on improving it.
"Also what about nuclear waste? We’d need to take care of that."

You’ve been operating 1,000 reactor years. Six reactors for five years is an additional 3%. Is that changing nuclear waste management in any way? No.
"And we’d need to expand the operations to 3-5 years because otherwise it doesn’t make economic sense to the companies running them. The government would need to step in and take over some of the risk."

What's the problem?
Maybe you just don't want to keep the reactors open?
7. Energy Replacement
"Until the new nuclear fuel is in place, we would make up for the shortage with more electricity coming from coal and gas."

The main advantage of nuclear is that it eliminates dependency in 2023.
In 2022, maybe you can just...
Hurry up with your inspections and fuel procurement?
Use more coal than gas?

Maybe the Green Party in Germany simply doesn't want to use more nuclear and coal right now?
The entire doc talks about the costs of reopening the reactors. There is no section about the benefits:
• Save $
• Fight Putin
• Help your neighbors

When you only talk about smthg's costs and not about benefits, you don't really want to do it
All of this shows lack of will.

DE could say: this is a national emergency. Instead of sending $900M/week to Putin, we're going to invest a fraction of that in nuclear.

It won't.
The truth: Germany's current energy strategy doesn't cut the dependency on Russian gas

It could if it kept the current nuclear reactors open & reopened those closed

It doesn't want to

Because for the 🇩🇪 gov, killing nuclear is +important than fighting Putin & helping Ukraine
Full article on this below.
Follow, subscribe for more like this. I write one article like this per week

unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/why-germany-…
More threads if you’re interested: why China is the way it is
Why we knew the pandemic was over 3 months ago
Why geography pushed Russia to be imperialistic in the past—and why that might be its downfall

unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/problem-of-r…
Why this war suggests the future of wars to come

unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/network-wars…
More are Uncharted Territories

unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tomas Pueyo 🇺🇦

Tomas Pueyo 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tomaspueyo

Mar 14
The West is not a place. It’s a state of mind. Those who use it mean “the places where we believe in human rights”.

That’s why the war in Ukraine matters to the west: it’s not just an attack on Western soil. It’s an attack on Western values.
Ukraine bleeds these values, and it pains to see them die for them.

That’s why few would care as much if Russia invaded Belarus, or when it intervened in Syria.

That’s why places in what’s traditionally the East (Japan, Australia) are considered western.
That’s one of the reasons why terrorist attacks against western values (Eg 9/11, Bataclan) raised more alarm than bombings between Shias and Sunnis, or left-right terrorism.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
Everybody is playing game theory and psych with Putin’s brain implicitly. Let’s make it explicit

When we say “NATO can’t enforce a no-fly-zone on🇺🇦: it makes WW3 possible” we imply that Putin has mental rules for what is fair retaliation

The challenge is to figure them out
He threatens any neighbor of military violence if they resist.

But if they don’t resist, they fall under his influence. So no country can give in to Putin’s military threats.
🇫🇮 and 🇸🇪 now say they want to join NATO. 🇷🇺 threatens military consequences.

But if 🇫🇮 and 🇸🇪 give in, they are remaining weak to appease 🇷🇺. What do you think happens next? Russia, seeing no downside in threats, raises them, and increases its influence over 🇫🇮 and 🇸🇪
Read 16 tweets
Mar 2
One of the reasons Russia invaded Ukraine that ppl don't talk about enough is population and birth rate. How big is that pbm? How has Putin tried to solve it?

Russia has a population pbm:
The birth rate is really low
Fertility increased in the last two decades, but it’s been below 2 children per woman since 1990. Between fertility and migration, Russia’s future doesn’t bode well.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 1
For context:
Military spend
Population
GDP

Ukraine is really poor. Its GDP per capita is a third of Russia's. A big chunk of that is Oil & Gas.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 26
Russia might still win, but Ukraine’s heroic resistance makes me dream of a new world:
• Ukraine uses its victory to shake off the power of its oligarchs and create a productive economy
• Reforms lead it to join the EU
• Putin falls
• Navalny (or similar) rises to power, Russia moves from imperialist to friendly neighbor that cares about its ppl’s well-being
• Belarus follows
• Assad loses his protector
• Georgia reunifies
• The EU transcends local national feelings and unites in foreign policy and military
• China gets cold feet about Taiwan
• Economic sanctions are proven to matter, and every authoritarian country becomes more pro-trade
• BTC becomes the obvious store of value
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
Many ppl disagree that the end of the pandemic is coming. But disagreeing is hard. Let's make it easier.

Here are 15 specific predictions. Which ones do you disagree with and why?
1. Probability that new variants emerge after Omicron: 99%
2. Probability that a new variant emerges in the next 6 months that has all 3 of these:
• = or > fatality rate vs. Delta or Original
• = or > R0 as Omicron
• = or > immune escape as Omicron
--> 15%
3. Probability that a new wave appears within 4 months of the worldwide Omicron peak and reaches or surpasses the same peak within those 4 months (in cases per million): 10%

4. Probability of the same within 8 months, in deaths per million: 25%
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(