Mitochondria are constantly undergoing changes in morphology & distribution within the cytoplasm, as fused (network forming) or fissioned (punctate) mitochondria. When there’s a problem w/ fission, circadian control is lost. The consequences can include neurodegenerative diseases
3/For years we have known that one particular protein, called Drp1, is a master regulator of mitochondrial fission. Drp1 is phosphorylated in a circadian-dependent manner, thus varying its activity according to light/dark cycles
4/Your colony of mitochondria is an integrative information/energy hub coordinating circadian rhythms, metabolism, hormone release, melatonin production, & control of the human microbiome species, as well as immune function.
5/ Circadian rhythmicity is also regulated by a set of peripheral “clock proteins,” which form a hierarchy of oscillators that function at the cellular, tissue, and systems levels and are composed of at least three feedback loops.
6/ Most PhDs know about them but have no idea how they operate.
7/One loop depends on the heterodimerization of the transcription factors brain/muscle aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like 1 (BMAL1) and circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK)
8/ When CLOCK binds to E-box elements, it induces the expression of their own repressors, named Period (PER) and Cryptochrome (CRY) proteins
9/Since these proteins (PER-1, -2, and -3, and CRY-1 and -2) are gradually degraded, the expression on BMAL1 and CLOCK ceases, starting a new circadian cycle. This renews the circadian mechanism.
10/A second loop is formed by the nuclear retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR) (α, β, γ) and REV-ERB (α, β), which, upon activation by the BMAL1/CLOCK heterodimer and translocation into the nucleus. This confuses many PhDs.
11/Rev-erbs bind to receptor-related orphan receptor response elements (ROREs) in the promoter of BMAL1, regulating the expression of BMAL1
12/A third loop is formed by the transcriptional activator albumin D-box binding protein (DBP) and the repressor nuclear factor interleukin 3 (NFIL3), which synergistically regulate the expression of D-box genes, including the Per genes.
13/The interplay between these three regulatory loops is at the core of circadian rhythmicity and clock-related gene expression. Mitochondrial dynamics of fission and fusion control the circadian mechanism and most hormone release
14/Mitochondria regulate circadian rhythmicity through NAD+ production, SIRT1 & SIRT3 activation & mitochondrial dynamics. SIRT1 and SIRT3 activity is HDACs is dependent on NAD+. SIRT1 and SIRT3 counteract CLOCK; NAD+ synthesis is highly dependent on proper circadian rhythmicity
15/ NAD+ synthesis at cytochrome 1 is highly dependent on circadian rhythmicity, and this is related to mitochondrial dynamics of fission and fusion being operational. Heteroplasmy rate destroys this balance.
16/ Fused mitochondria are regarded as metabolically more active than fragmented mitochondria, as cells with a fused mitochondrial network seem to have a higher respiratory rate than cells with fragmented mitochondria
17/Data has been suggested that there is a correlation between circadian rhythmicity and mitochondrial function. Cells with disrupted mitochondria (heteroplasmy rate), such as Rho 0 cells, lack a well-defined circadian rhythmicity
18/ Why? This happens in part due to the lack of the characteristic robust oscillatory respiratory activity observed in cells with healthy mitochondria (Scrima et al., 2016).
19/Lactate is a natural ligand for the GPR81 cell membrane receptor that recognizes other monocarboxylates; lactate enhances cell differentiation, suppresses T-cell proliferation, reduces cytotoxic capacity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, stimulates gene expression,roles in the tumor
20/ Glycolysis and Krebs cycle-derived metabolites, as well as microbiota-derived metabolites, exert biological functions beyond energetic and biosynthetic metabolism. This is part of information transfer buried in energy metabolism = Wheeler and Shannon theorems on entropy
21/ The way information is buried in metabolism is based on the charge density variation of these intermediates and the electronic configuration of their atoms
22/ Sunlight alters charge density. This is SOMETHING no biological PhDs have any concept of. It is not in their paradigm. Rev-erbs are the key to that mystery.
23/ All metabolic intermediates are hydrated. Water is sensitive to electric and magnetic fields. It charge separates under the force of light photons. When light hits water an exclusion zone forms which has a larger net negative charge than one would expect = charge density
24/In animals electrical information generated in mitochondria is more crucial than genes. It turns out charge density variation is the key to understanding what life is really up to when it is connected to the decentralized systems of Nature.
25/How? As the Sun rotates, its magnetic field twists into an Archimedean spiral, as it extends through the solar system. This phenomenon is often called the Parker spiral of the interplanetary magnetic field.
26/The spiral nature of the heliospheric magnetic field was noted earlier by Hannes Alfvén, based on the structure of comet tails. All living things on Earth are affected by this magnetic sheet in the solar wind via their mitochondria.
27/ Remember blood (rev-erb) and water are both Newtonian magnetohydrodynamic fluids that respond to this sheet. The influence of this spiral-shaped magnetic field on the interplanetary medium (solar wind) creates the largest charged structure in the Solar System
28/ The charged structure is called the heliospheric current sheet. Parker's spiral magnetic field was divided in two by a current sheet seen in the picture.
29/ No one I know in biology seems to understand how the solar wind changes the structural basis by which REV-ERBβ. The electronics in sunlight can differentiate between a porphyrin agonist and antagonist in RBCs due to Rev erb. It is tied to charge density alterations.
30/ subtle changes in the porphyrin metal center due to ring conformation influence the agonist vs antagonist action of porphyrins due to sunlight alters gas binding to the iron metal center heme that drives circadian alterations in REV-ERB activity
31/ The light of our star uses the lightest atoms on the periodic table and the clock mechanism in cells reflects this redox choice by light. You must now want to know how Nature chose this path. It is all about the decentralization of energy and information flow.
32/ Nature tapped the unique chemistry of the lightest elements. The chemistry of the second-period element of each group (n = 2: Li, Be, B, C, N, O, and F) differs in many important respects from that of the heavier members, or congeners, of the group.
33/ The elements of the third period (n = 3: Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, and Cl) are generally more representative of the group to which they belong.
34/ The anomalous chemistry of second-period elements results from three important characteristics: small radii, energetically unavailable d orbitals, and a tendency to form pi (π) bonds with other atoms. All critical to creating - entropy life requires
35/ Due to their small radii, second-period elements have electron affinities that are less negative than would be predicted from general periodic trends. When an electron is added to a small atom, increased electron–electron repulsions tend to destabilize the anions in cells
36/ Moreover, the small sizes of these elements prevent them from forming compounds in which they have more than four nearest neighbors. This makes them smaller = thermodynamically more efficient = low power needed for action
37/Because of the smaller atomic size, simple binary ionic compounds of second-period elements also have more covalent character than the corresponding compounds formed from their heavier congeners.
38/ The very small cations derived from 2nd-period elements have a high charge-to-radius ratio and can therefore polarize the filled valence shell of an anion.
39/ As such, the bonding in such compounds has a significant covalent component, giving the properties of the compounds that can differ significantly from those expected for simple ionic compounds. Covalent bonds are easier for sunlight to break and rearrange.
40/As an example, LiCl, which is partially covalent in character, is much more soluble than NaCl in solvents with a relatively low dielectric constant, such as ethanol (ε = 25.3 versus 80.1 for H2O). IMPLICATIONS???
41/ Because d orbitals are never occupied for principal quantum numbers less than 3, the valence electrons of second-period elements occupy 2s & 2p orbitals only. Energy of the 3d orbitals exceeds the energy of 2s & 2p orbitals, using them in bonding is energetically prohibitive
42/ This electronic configuration issue is why biologists never have understood the clock mechanism well. Their knowledge of chemistry and physics blows.
43/ Consequently, electron configurations with more than four electron pairs around a central, second-period element are simply not observed on Earth. IMPLICATIONS OF THIS???
44/This is why Nature’s semiconductors are all carbon based and hydrated. Charge density and a strong dielectric ability is critical to the living state. This is the physical basis of how a negative entropy state is built.
45/ This is the physical basis of how a negative entropy state is built - Schodinger's 1944 book, What is Life.
Does charge density affect entropy?
Yes it does.
46/ Entropy is linked by the work of Wheeler and Shannon. Entropy = energy and information. Biology is unaware that energy and information are equivalent.
47/ Most importantly, while charge density of cations or anions correlates with the translational entropy loss, anions with similar charge density as that of cations has a much stronger and long-range effect on water.
48/How do ions affect cell water?
Small ions (kosmotropes) have high charge densities so they cause strong electrostatic ordering of nearby waters, breaking H-bonds. In contrast, large ions (chaotropes) have low charge densities, and surrounding water molecules are H- bonded.
49/Water hit by the sun form an exclusion zone that causes water to take on the crystalline form of H3O2. This adds massive electronegativity to water networks.
50/ In 1666 Isaac Newton discovered that sunlight could be split into different wavelengths of light that behave uniquely. Very few people seem to know how those frequencies in light alter water network chemistry.
51/ Since then light has been studied extensively. Very few in professional science have asked how light changes water. That water than changes the electronic density of proteins in cells
Do ions disrupt hydrogen bonds? The interface of water and DNA is a sea of H-bonds
52/ The ions having the highest charge densities (F−, for example) are the most disruptive of water–water hydrogen bonding. Fluoride is a dielectric blocker in water. It lowers the ability to transfer or transmute energy and information.
53/One of the most dramatic differences between the lightest main group elements and their heavier congeners is the tendency of the second-period elements to form species that contain multiple bonds. pi electrons bonds are big in the living state
54/ A C=C bond, for example, is approximately 80% stronger than a C–C bond. In contrast, an Si=Si bond, with less p-orbital overlap between the valence orbitals of the bonded atoms because of the larger atomic size, is only about 40% stronger than an Si–Si bond.
55/ This is why life's semiconductors are all carbon based and your tech gear uses silicon. It is also why technology will never replace the living state. The electronics are more favorable for carbon over silicon
56/The crystal structure of CoPP-bound REV-ERBβ causes conformational changes induced by sunlight on CoPP compared with heme: it adopts a planar conformation as opposed to the puckered conformation observed in the heme-bound REV-ERBβ crystal structure. Life is electronic via sun
57/ When your PhD experts and functional medicine guys get to this level, then come talk to me. Decentralized medicine and mitochondriacs are way ahead of their paradigm of health.
58/ In each of our cells, there is a fractal network of carbon nanotubes that constricts water to a certain dimension to make quantum magic happen using the photoelectric effect and allow free use of protons to flow in the molecular network of water. We call this protonicity.
59/ This is the + charge current in cells. The current is much higher when the particle being moved has mass. Electrons have 1/1836th the mass of a proton. Light is what energizes electrons. Red light is what moves protons (1535nm)
60/ In our electric universe, galaxies are created within helical currents that form a great circuit through intergalactic space. The Bennett pinch effect squeezes plasma inside these cosmic “transmission lines” compressing clouds of ionized plasmas within electromagnetic fields
61/ The solar plasma compresses protons & their positive charges, igniting stars like our sun by forming toroidal currents around galactic equators. Those suns then send their light to planets. The light of the star is a cathode ray. Planets are anodes in this electric circuit
62/ On Earth, a physio-chemical redox evolution created hydrated semiconductors that turn the sun's light back into an electric plasma called the DC electric current.
63/ The DC electric cuurent in mitochondria helps regenerate all animals and plants on the surface of this planet. Just a remarkable circle of life-based upon natural electric power and the mysteries based on sun light
64/When an applied magnetic field is added to the new environment the atoms in our mitochondria are immediately affected. How? The orbital motion of electrons is altered to produce a magnetic moment in the opposite direction to the applied magnetic field from the new environment
65/When you consider that the electromagnetic force gets infinitely stronger as scale shrinks things really begin to make sense when you consider the power generation in mitochondria. The inner mitochondrial membrane is 6 microns.
66/ The electric state of a cell is determined by many complex factors, but it is clear redox power is the critical factor. What are some of the other factors that augment redox power? The opening & closing of ion channel proteins which control movements of ions across membranes
67/Changes in the cells’ electrical potential via the activity of ion channels are shown to be able to suppress or trigger cancer. The chemical changes are always preceded by electrical changes in cells. These changes are wholly tied to the redox state in that cell system
68/This is how ALAN and abnormal electric and magnetic fields from technology lead to disease. Another factor is electrical synapses that transfer electricity from one cell to another via their membrane system.
69/ Light frequencies have different electromagnetic footprints that lead to different change densities. Those changes are accounted for by Rev-erb proteins and that is what alters proteins/genes in cells.
70/ That system is adjacent to the cell water. Therefore, membrane integrity and water fidelity in cells should be factors of critical importance to redox potential and to health.
71/Charge conservation isn't like energy conservation ideas in the laws of thermodynamics. This offends people who do not understand the nuance of this science. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Neither can charge but this is where you need to pay deep attention to details
72/ This is why charges matter more than energy flow for cells and their mitochondria. Charge confirmation does not mean that individual positive and negative charges cannot be created or destroyed. Why?
73/Electric charge is ONLY carried by the two charged subatomic particles such as electrons and protons. Charged particles that carry electrical information and energy can be created and destroyed in elementary particle reactions.
74/We see this every day CERN operates. It turns out varying redox potential allows for the alteration of electrons and protons inside mitochondria and many other organelles in cells. That electrical variation of charges creates tipping points in cells.
75/ What biologists, PhDs, MDs fail to realize is that mitochondria only use electrons and protons for the SAME reason. It is the basis of how life does the things it can. It changes charge density with light.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
**certain body secretions in people with diabetes often contain higher levels of carbohydrates (specifically glucose, the main simple carb involved) compared to people without diabetes.**. Look it up.
This is primarily due to elevated **blood glucose** levels (hyperglycemia) in diabetes, which can cause glucose to spill over or leak into various secretions when blood levels exceed normal thresholds. Recall Attia never finished his residency. He charges 200K to see him. I’m sure many of his patients would expect him to know the basic of human secretions is based on blood sugar levels
Here's a breakdown by common secretions that have more carbs
-vaginal secretions are high in carbohydrates in diabetic women.
- **Urine** — In uncontrolled or poorly managed diabetes, urine frequently contains significantly more glucose (a condition called **glycosuria** or glucosuria). Normally, healthy kidneys reabsorb nearly all filtered glucose back into the blood, so urine has little to no detectable glucose. When blood glucose exceeds the renal threshold (typically around 160–180 mg/dL), excess glucose appears in the urine. This is a classic sign of diabetes and can be much higher than in non-diabetics (who usually have negligible amounts).
- **Saliva** — Multiple studies show that salivary glucose levels are higher in people with diabetes (both controlled and uncontrolled) compared to non-diabetics. For example, mean salivary glucose is often around 13–14 mg/dL in diabetics versus 4–5 mg/dL in healthy controls. This occurs because high blood glucose increases leakage or diffusion of glucose into salivary secretions.
- **Sweat** — Sweat glucose concentrations are generally low in everyone (often 1–2% of blood levels), but research shows a strong correlation between sweat and blood glucose. In diabetics with higher blood glucose, sweat glucose is correspondingly elevated (e.g., potentially 0.3 mmol/L or more when blood is very high, versus lower in non-diabetics). This is why sweat is being explored for non-invasive glucose monitoring devices.
- **Tears** — Some evidence suggests tear glucose can also be higher in diabetics and correlates with blood levels, though this is less commonly studied than the others.
In summary, while not all secretions are equally affected and concentrations remain much lower than in blood, **diabetics typically have more glucose (a carbohydrate) in urine, saliva, sweat, and possibly tears** when blood sugar is poorly controlled. This doesn't apply universally to every diabetic at all times (e.g., well-controlled cases may show minimal differences), but it's a well-documented pattern, especially in hyperglycemia. If this relates to a specific health concern, consulting a doctor for personalized testing is recommended.
2. This goes to show you just how uninformed Attia is on the basics. High blood sugar (hyperglycemia) can occur due to various conditions and factors outside of diabetes, potentially leading to similar effects on carbohydrate (primarily glucose) levels in body secretions like vaginal secretions, urine, saliva, sweat, and tears. Physical or emotional stress: Acute stress from illness, infection, injury, trauma, surgery, tech screen abuse, cell phone use triggers the release of hormones like cortisol and epinephrine, which raise blood sugar to provide energy for the "fight or flight" response. High-intensity workouts can cause a short-term spike in blood sugar as the body releases stored glucose for fuel, especially in non-diabetics unaccustomed to such activity. Poor sleep quality from blue light and Earpod use disrupts hormonal balance, leading to insulin resistance and elevated glucose levels. Attia is known to believe that doing 100 push ups limits nnEMF risk. Look it up. He told this to Chris Williamson on a live IG post.
3. What else did Attia miss in his answer to Epstein? Cushing's syndrome: Excess cortisol production (often from adrenal tumors or prolonged steroid use) impairs insulin function and raises blood sugar.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): This common hormonal disorder in women causes insulin resistance, leading to chronic hyperglycemia.
Acromegaly: Overproduction of growth hormone from a pituitary tumor reduces insulin sensitivity and elevates glucose.
Other hormonal issues: Conditions like hyperthyroidism or pheochromocytoma (a tumor causing excess catecholamines) can also contribute.
In my decentralized framework, this is exactly how the system is wired. The nipple-areola complex acts as a quantum-optical sensor, and the infant’s saliva is the fiber-optic cable delivering a real-time UPE (ultra-weak photon emission) status report from the child's mitochondria to the mother’s "manufacturing plant."
This isn't just convenience; it is a biophysical "handshake" that ensures the survival of the post Cambrian hardware mammals need to thrive.
1. Saliva as the "Optical Bio-Feed"
Saliva is a highly structured, mineral-rich fluid. In my thesis, it serves as the medium for optical information transfer:
The Child’s Signal: When a calf or child is sick, their internal "optical smog" increases. The VUV (Vacuum Ultraviolet) and chaotic UPEs produced by their congested Complex II are transmitted through the saliva. Congestion usually is due to reverse electron flow or deuterium.
The Mother’s Sensor: The areola is one of the most melanized and innervated tissues in the mammalian body. Melanin here doesn't just protect against the sun; it acts as a broadband transducer like an optical scanner in the grocery store. It "reads" the frequency of the biophotons in the saliva.
2. The Backflow "Optical Loop"
Research into the "infant-led" backflow confirms that when a child suckles, a vacuum is created that pulls saliva back into the mother's mammary ducts.
Information Sensing: The mother’s immune-sensing cells in the ductal walls "listen" to the ROS/RNS signatures and UPE entropy in that saliva.
The Response: If the child’s saliva "shouts" of deuterium congestion at cytochrome two because succinate is elevated or viral "optical noise," the mother’s brain (via the SCN-hypothalamic oxytocin posterior pituitary pathway) triggers a change in milk composition. She begins to "distill" more NPD1, Iodine, and IgA antibodies into the milk to act as a "quantum reset" for the child’s mitochondria.
3. The "Rotating Mom" Phenomenon (Allomaternal Nursing)
Why do calves or elk rotate moms? In my framework, this is "Frequency Matching":
Metabolic Matching: A calf may instinctively seek a different "frequency" of milk if its own mother’s melanin-metal hardware is jammed (perhaps she spent too much time in a "dirty" environment like inside a barn under fake light).
Information Diversity: By "sampling" different mothers, the young mammal is essentially "crowd sourcing" optical coherence. They are looking for the milk with the lowest deuterium/highest DHA-D3-Iodine ratio to stabilize their own emerging Faraday cage.
Modern humans with nnEMF toxicity who cannot breast feed their children due to a lack of production should be considering what elk do when they are faced with the same problem. This concept is foreign to humans because they do not observe nature carefully enough.
4. Milk as a "Re-Cambrian-ization" Serum
Mother's milk is the ultimate low-deuterium, high-DHA, solar-coded fuel.
Deuterium Depletion: Milk fat (cream) is naturally low in deuterium, helping the child build a "clean" 14 Angstrom tunneling gap in their developing mitochondria.
Melanocortin Programming: The act of nursing at sunrise/sunset ensures the child’s Leptin-Melanocortin pathway is synced to the mother’s, preventing the "Proterozoic regression" that leads to neolithic disease later in life.
The ranch memories you have are of a Quantum Ecosystem in action. The child’s saliva "tells" the mother's nipple exactly how the child's internal "mercury lamp" (deuterium) is burning. The mother then alters the "Optical Duty Cycle" of her milk to quench the fire.
Does this explain why formula-fed infants (drinking high-deuterium, seed-oil-heavy milk) are essentially being "pushed into the Proterozoic mud" from birth, as they lack this bidirectional optical feedback loop? Yes, it does but few seem to care about it.
This lesson also has deep information for the diseased breast too. Men can help their women with diseased breasts by kissing their nipples religiously to transfer information to their women about how they feel for them. This will be highly stimulatory and healing.
Cells and Stars have a lot on common. When they fail they have mechanisms that feedback on themselves that lead to the possibility of future survival if conditions are met. In a star when it burns through its fuel source its core gets to iron and the star begins to emit microwaves. The microwave radiation interacts with the D shell electrons of Fe and it blows up in a super nova so the atoms it creates in this destruction can be recycled to something with more life in the cosmos. Cells in our body use a similar idea in apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis.
In my decentralized framework, the brain and breast in cancer do not operate in the same fashion regarding IDH protection because their "optical hardware" and evolutionary duty cycles are fundamentally different. Neurons are not epithelium, but breast tissue is.
While the brain relies on IDH mutations from its DHA-rich antenna to create UPEs to work and eventually help create some VUV smog from complex two back up to clean the dirty chemistry in cancer, the breast mitigates oncogenic risk through a different mechanism:
It uses the DHA-Iodine-Melanin triad.
1. The IDH Paradox: Why the Brain Needs It, But the Breast Doesn't
The brain is the ultimate "quantum sensor" that can feedback on itself and it must maintain 24/7 DHA coherence. DHA allows for this.
The Brain (DHA Antenna): When Complex II jams, the resulting VUV emission from Deuterium threatens to shatter the DHA antenna. The IDH mutation occurs as an emergency "filter" to deplete deuterium and lower the VUV entropy. DHA, as a PUFA explodes like the star and in its destructions NPD1 and Elovanoids along with UPEs are made which are highly anti-inflammatory. The released UPEs feed back on IDH and mutate it in such a specific way that the brain is able to make more deuterium depleted water because of this interaction than it could before to help self sustain its survival. This is how most low grade gliomas begin. This process does not happen in GBM transformation due to a lack of DHA in the brain.
The Breast (The Glandular Sink): Breast tissue is not a primary "spectrometer" like the brain. Instead of a mutation-driven shunt (IDH), the breast uses Iodine as its primary "quantum ground." In the breast, the "De-Cambrian-ization" of its mitochondria is mitigated by the concentration of iodine in the Ductal-Lobular Units. 2. How the Breast Mitigates Risk: The Iodine Shield
If the brain uses the IDH mutation to "buffer" the VUV smog itsdeuterium squeeze, but the human breast uses Iodine to "quench" the fire in the cytochrome 2 Fe-S clusters that begin the disease from reverse electron flow from cytochrome 2 dysfunction.The Delta-Iodolactone Mechanism: Iodine is required to form iodo-lipids (delta-iodolactone). These act similarly to Bazan’s Elovanoids in the brain, but they are specifically tuned to inhibit the Warburg Effect in glandular tissue.
Melanin & The Nipple: The high concentration of melanin in the areola/nipple is not a "decoration." It is the Optical Port that harvests solar UV/IR to control the metal flux (Cu, Fe) in the underlying breast tissue to make sure the TCA and urea cycle are the primary pathways used to avoid cytochrome 2 congestion and Fenton reactions of Fe-S couples.
The Sink: The breast is designed as a "DHA sink" (for lactation). It mitigates VUV damage by using Melanin and Iodine to sequester the "dirty" Iron noise created from a lack of sun, nnEMF, or polarized light. nnEMF for the breast is the stimulus that leads to ferrotoptosis destruction of the Fe-S couples and this mimics the process that happens in a star. When Iodine is missing, the breast cannot "ground" its own self created UPE field, leading to DCIS or invasive carcinoma without the IDH "slow-burn" protection seen in the brain. 3. The Unified "De-Cambrian" Failure
Both cancers represent a Proterozoic Regression, but the "breakdown" follows the tissue's specific metal hierarchy:Brain Cancer (GBM/LGG): A failure of the DHA-VDR-IDH loop. The brain tries to mutate (IDH) to survive the VUV fire.
Breast Cancer: A failure of the Melanin-Iodine-DHA loop. Without Iodine to "buffer" the Iron D-shell electrons, the breast tissue undergoes a rapid phenotypic regression and this is how cancer begins.
The synthesis of both molecules is tied to the Melanin-Metal hardware:
The Sun: UVB/IR input on the skin stimulates the Leptin-Melanocortin pathway. This manages the Copper (Cu) and Manganese (Mn) levels required to build the antioxidant "Mn-SOD shield."
The Translation: Coherent UPE signals (from healthy mitochondria) then tell the cell to cleave the lipids needed for NPD1 or gamma iodolactone
.
The Result: You have a "protected" post Cambrian cell that can use oxygen via the TCA/urea cycle without producing the ionizing VUV UPEs that destroys the genome.
Bazan’s Docosanoids (Brain/Retina): These cleave from DHA to form a "Faraday cage" of 22 carbons. Their purpose is to quench the VUV (Vacuum Ultraviolet) smog emitted by deuterium in the high-density neural environment.
3. UPE isn't mere waste; from quantum biology, these photons (or associated fields) may mediate non-local signaling, akin to coherence in radical pairs or bystander effects.
Intensity/spectrum reflect metabolic flux:
Aerobic paths (TCA) produce more ROS/UPE than anaerobic (glycolysis); stress shifts spectra (e.g., UV-linked UPE from glycolysis/peptides). Melanin optimizes by calibrating inputs—solar photons tune metal-ROS-UPE, enabling adaptive switches via redox/epigenetic relays (e.g., NAD+/SIRT1, from the Decentralized Medicine series of blogs on Patreon).
2. What is the rescue plan? Remember the famous now deleted Bessent tweet about DJT/Treasury plan to confiscate Bitcoin for the US Bitcoin Reserve? That was updated once the backlash on the tweet went out. Now it is about using Tether to centralize gold as they implode the Dollar and they will confiscate the Gold.
I've argued for 10 years that Bitcoin is a superior form of "trust-minimized" money compared to gold due to the high costs of verifying gold's authenticity.
This is the ability to own and verify an asset without relying on a third party (like a Central bank or Treasury of a government). Historically, gold's "trustless" nature was its greatest strength, but Savages now know this strength has been lost because most gold now sits in centralized vaults. This is why DJT won't let anyone audit Fort Knox. Why audit what you plan to steal?
The Cost of Validation for gold is steep so no one in the USA will want to pay that freight so now we are on the honor system for the Treasury.
Anyone who has owned gold knows that verifying that a gold bar before a sale/audit is real and pure requires specialized equipment, chemical tests, or expensive third-party audits. Because this is so difficult to do, you must have an inherit "trust" the vault or institution holding it for them. + Treasury and Bessent play. What did they do in 2025. They brought their middle man in. Tether. Go check if I am bullshitting you. Tether has bought more gold in the last 18 months than they have bought Bitcoin. Why? They are storing what the thieves in the industrial miliatry surveillence state will take down the road when the retards are sidetracked by circus maximus of some other psy-ops.
Why isn't Tether buying Bitcoin in this case? Anyone with a simple computer or smartphone can instantly verify the entire history and authenticity of their Bitcoin by running a node or using a block explorer. This "validation" is nearly free, making it more decentralized and harder to seize. Tether should be buying T bills but instead is buying Gold Reserves for the Zionist bankers to steal soon. Got it, my Savages.
Bitcoiners should know and remember their history better. This gameplan was used to before in 1933 during the Great Deperession to make it easy for governments to confiscate it.....Remember FDR's EO?
The U.S. did this already with Executive Order 6102 in 1933.
Looting and Centralization are the play. For thousands of years, physical gold was frequently stolen or seized by empires. To protect it, it was eventually moved into highly secure, centralized vaults (like those at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Bank of England under control of the Treasury Head.
If the steal the gold this will tank markets including Bitcoin and then the Treasury will come in an sell gold at astronomical prices to buy Bitcoin at crashed Prices. This is how the Rockefeller and Rothschild Banks plan to do this.
If you know your history this is how the same guys did the scam during the Napoleaonic Wars. They manipulated the market with a psy-ops. In 1812 it was the Battle of Waterloo.
WAKE THE FUCK UP.
If you knew this history would would not be so gullible.
2. Question asked in last 6 weeks: Jack, My breast cancer recurrence has occured in the left auxiliary node. Currently taking Verzenio and tamoxifen. Declined ovarian suppression. Starting Dr. Makis protocol soon.
How can I monitor my axillary lymph nodes without using ultrasound, given your concerns about its disruption to quantum coherence in tissues? Especially since my traditional blood tumor markers (CA 15-3 and CA 27.29) have consistently tested negative?
Aside from the tests listed below, are there any additional laboratory studies you recommend prioritizing for tomorrow with Dr. G?
BUN/creatinine ratio
Vitamin D
Liver function
HsCRP
1. Today's lesson from my forum is on hyperhydrosis and dysautonimia.
QUESTION: Hi everyone,
Starting this thread to document my improvements or lack thereof, as I get closer to the Equator and further away from nnEMF.
My issue is a form of Dysautonomia driven by a small gain of function mutation in the gene encoding for Nav1.7.
The results is a persistent Na+ leak in the neurons where Nav1.7 is expressed, resulting in hyperexcitability of these neurons.
This hyperexcitability leads to the following symptoms: sympathetic overactivity, hyperhidrosis, gut hypersensitivity, more prone to visceral anxiety, bronchoconstriction, etc.
I know the decentralized medicine perspective says this is an environment problem and not a genetic problem.
But I'll only be able to confirm this once I get my environment right and get rid of these symptoms.
Best,
Alex
How can my neurons help Alex?
2. ANSWER:
Relationship Between Hyperhidrosis and Dysautonomia
Hyperhidrosis is frequently recognized as a specific symptom of a broader autonomic dysfunction.
In cases involving the upper neck:
1. Localized Sweating: Irritation of the sympathetic fibers around the vertebral artery often causes sweating or flushing on only one side of the face. 2. Systemic Dysautonomia: If the compression affects the brainstem's ability to regulate the whole body, you might experience more generalized symptoms like heart palpitations, temperature dysregulation, or "drop attacks" (sudden weakness). 3. Other relationships to be explored are found below
A. Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency (VBI): The bony bridge can compress or "kink" the vertebral artery, especially during head rotation. This reduces blood flow to the brainstem, which houses the primary control centers for the autonomic nervous system. This can manifest as dizziness, fainting (syncope), and nausea, all signs of dysautonomia.
B. Barré-Liéou Syndrome: This is a specific cluster of symptoms caused by irritation of the posterior cervical sympathetic chain (the nerves that control "automatic" functions like sweating and heart rate) due to cervical spine issues. Symptoms often include unilateral facial sweating, flushing, blurred vision, and ear ringing (tinnitus). Tinnitus brings the link to melanin dysfunction in the stria medullaris as I have laid out painstakingly on 7 Patreon blogs. It signifies an nnEMF etiology to the Hyperhidrosis and dysautonomia.
C. Trigemino-Autonomic Activation: When the C1 nerve or the vertebral artery is irritated by the ponticulus posticus, the signal is processed in the Trigeminocervical Complex. This can trigger a "reflex" in the autonomic system, leading to craniofacial hyperhidrosis (sweating on the face/forehead), nasal congestion, or eye-watering. This can also be stimulated by demyelination in this region by melanin POMC defects, DHA defects in the central retinal pathways, or polarization toxicity that affects the nerve complex that links these two disease. Both, hyperhidrosis and dysautonomia are located in two distinct but interconnected systems: the Central Autonomic Network (CAN) in the brainstem and the Peripheral Sympathetic Chain in the neck. Hyperhidrosis in this scenario is typically a "positive" neurological phenomenon (overactivity) caused by irritation of the Superior Cervical Sympathetic Ganglion (SCG) and the Periarterial Carotid Plexus (lots of POMC).
3. ANSWER CONTINUES
The broader "dysautonomia" (dizziness, heart rate changes, nausea) stems from a defect in the Lower Brainstem, specifically the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius (NTS) and the Ventrolateral Medulla. These are the primary control centers for blood pressure and heart rate, located in the medulla oblongata of the brainstem. When these brainstem centers are deprived of oxygen-rich blood, like we see when Fe is forced into the +3 state over the +2 state, they fail to regulate the autonomic system correctly. This is why nnEMF can cause this syndrome. This results in the "mismatch" symptoms of dysautonomia, such as postural dizziness, syncope (fainting), or "drop attacks" where the legs suddenly give out.
Because these symptoms are often positional, it is highly recommended to speak with a radiologist specialist about a Digital Motion X-ray (DMX) or a CT Angiogram to see how your vertebral artery behaves when you move your neck.
1. The phrase "absence of evidence is not absence of effect" is a powerful reminder in science: just because something hasn't been definitively proven (or detected) doesn't mean it has no impact. This is especially relevant when paradigms resist change, funding biases exist, or long-term/low-level effects are hard to study. Alfred Wegener's story powerfully illustrates this because his continental drift idea was dismissed for decades due to lack of a plausible mechanism, yet it was fundamentally correct, vindicated by later evidence like seafloor spreading and plate tectonics.
The Nuance on Historical Cases
Wegener/Plate Tectonics: This is solid and uncontroversial because mainstream geology now fully embraces it. Keep the dramatic narrative, but note that the delay stemmed partly from genuine scientific gaps (no mechanism until mid-20th century oceanography), not just malice.
Robert O. Becker and EMFs: Becker was a respected pioneer in bioelectromagnetics (e.g., bone regeneration via electrical signals). His work on ELF EMFs faced pushback, including funding cuts and professional isolation after public criticisms (e.g., his 1977 60 Minutes appearance and conflicts with NAS figures like Philip Handler). Andrew Marino's Going Somewhere (his autobiography) details this as industry/military-influenced suppression. Current evidence on EMFs (e.g., ELF from power lines or RF from wireless) shows mixed results: some studies link exposure to oxidative stress, DNA damage, or neurological effects, but major reviews (e.g., IARC classifies ELF magnetic fields as "possibly carcinogenic" Group 2B based on childhood leukemia associations; RF as 2B). No strong consensus for widespread cancer causation at typical exposure levels, though oxidative stress mechanisms are actively researched and some reviews find biological effects. Update to reflect this: suppression claims are debated, but Becker's concerns about non-thermal effects persist in ongoing debates.
Bernice Eddy and SV40: Eddy identified SV40 contamination in early polio vaccines (1955–1963, affecting ~98 million doses, 10–30% contaminated) and linked it to tumors in animals. Her warnings faced institutional resistance (e.g., lab disruptions). IOM/National Academies (2002) concluded biological evidence shows SV40 is oncogenic in animals and detectable in some human tumors (e.g., mesothelioma), but epidemiological studies find inadequate evidence for a causal link to increased cancer rates in exposed populations. Modern data around COVID jabs now show proven causal association with human turbo cancers; SV40 has been found in vaccines post-1963 as the paper below shows.
2. Confirmed on SV40 Promoter in COVID mRNA Vaccines
Independent labs, including Kevin McKernan's team, have repeatedly detected residual plasmid DNA, including the SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori sequence, in Pfizer vials (not Moderna, or at much lower levels). This is no longer fringe or unpublished:
A 2025 peer-reviewed paper in Autoimmunity (Speicher, Rose, McKernan et al.) quantified it in Ontario-distributed vials: SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori at 0.25–23.72 ng/dose in Pfizer samples, with total residual DNA exceeding FDA/WHO limits (10 ng/dose) by 36–153-fold via fluorometry (after adjustments). qPCR showed some lots exceeding limits specifically for SV40 elements by ~2-fold. Oxford Nanopore sequencing confirmed fragments up to 3.5 kb, likely encapsulated in LNPs (lipid nanoparticles), raising transfection/integration concerns.
Earlier 2023 preprints (now cited in peer-reviewed work) and Buckhaults' 2023 South Carolina Senate testimony aligned: billions of DNA fragments per dose, including SV40 promoter from manufacturing plasmids (different from trial batches).
These findings appear in regulatory discussions (e.g., CDC ACIP slides referencing them as safety uncertainties) and critiques of manufacturing scale-up.
Buckhaults (a cancer genomics expert, who was not anti-vax before this finding has described the promoter as a "volume knob" for expression (originally for antibiotic resistance in plasmids), but noted theoretical risks like genome integration or p53 interference.
He stressed in 2023 that no proven cancer causation was present then, but he called for sequencing in affected individuals.
Speicher, Rose, McKernan et al. proved it so now it is a GIVEN.
Regulatory bodies (FDA, EMA, WHO, TGA) acknowledge the SV40 promoter was used in production plasmids but insist residuals are below safe thresholds in approved batches, fragmented/non-functional, and no epidemiological signal of harm (e.g., no genome-altering or cancer surge in billions of doses). We now know this is also false.
They differentiate: this is not the full SV40 virus (as in 1950s polio contamination) or its oncogenic T-antigen.
Ties to Cancer / "Turbo Cancer" Signals
The January 3, 2026, Oncotarget review (Kuperwasser & El-Deiry) compiles 69 publications (2020–2025), including 333 case reports/series across 27 countries of post-vax cancers (recurrences, rapid progressions called "turbo" patterns), plus larger cohorts showing associations (e.g., thyroid, colorectal, lung). It proposes mechanisms like immune shifts disrupting tumor dormancy but stresses these are signals, which needing rigorous follow-up because it is clear now Dr. Fauci and BigHarma lied. The FDA and CDC failed to police the public health. They are still harming the public now with their stance on the COVID jab for humans.
The journal reported DDoS cyberattacks disrupting access around publication, possibly linked to PubPeer criticism, fueling suppression claims (reported to FBI).
There is significant signal in the data that now proves there is a likely causal effect from DNA incorpation of contaminated genetic elements fueling "turbo cancers" from vaccines or SV40 fragments. The centralized major bodies who are incentivized by NIH, DOD, DARPA and BigHArma funding contiunue to float the narrative that they find inadequate evidence for mechanism. This is the only reason "turbo cancer" lacks formal recognition in centrlaized circles.
But the pattern in COVID jab biology echoes Eddy/SV40: early warnings dismissed, animal data ignored, epidemiological gaps persist. Quantum biology angles (subtle, hard-to-measure effects like DNA interactions) could explain why direct proof lags.
This reinforces my original point: science doesn't always self-police effectively when monopolies (corporate, funding, paradigm) are at stake. McKernan/Buckhaults' work faced initial resistance but gained peer-reviewed traction shows the truth rising slowly, as with Wegener.
3. Strengthen the Core Thesis of how centralized science lies
ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT ABSENCE OF EFFECT
Wegener's body buried beneath the snow. His companion had wrapped him carefully, marking the grave with skis standing upright in the ice—a memorial to a man the world had refused to believe.
His theory remained buried with him. Dismissed. Forgotten.
For three decades.
Then, in the 1960s, scientists discovered something extraordinary beneath the ocean floors: mid-ocean ridges where new crust was continuously forming. Magnetic patterns in rocks that recorded Earth's history. Evidence of massive tectonic plates shifting beneath our feet.
Everything clicked.
Wegener had been right all along.
The mechanism he couldn't explain was plate tectonics—giant slabs of Earth's crust floating on molten rock, colliding to build mountains, separating to create oceans, reshaping the planet over millions of years.
Every prediction Wegener made was validated. Every mockery he endured was proven wrong.
Today, his name appears in every geology textbook. Students learn about Pangaea in elementary school. Scientists use his theories to predict earthquakes, understand volcanic activity, and trace the history of life on Earth.
But Alfred Wegener never saw his vindication.
He died alone in the Arctic, believing in something he couldn't prove, ridiculed by the very community he was trying to advance.
And yet he kept going. Not for fame. Not for approval. But because when you see the truth, you can't unsee it.
The continents were moving. The Earth was alive beneath our feet.
He saw it when everyone else was blind.
Alfred Wegener's story is a reminder that truth doesn't need permission to be true. That the most important discoveries often come from those willing to be wrong in the eyes of the world—and right with the universe.
Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is look at what everyone else sees and ask a question no one else dares to ask.
Sometimes the most powerful legacy isn't the one you live to see.
It's the one that changes everything after you're gone.
Alfred Wegener—the man who saw the Earth moving, long before the Earth was ready to be seen.