(Thread) In the first What If? book, I answered a question about cooking a steak by dropping it from space. At one point, I commented—jokingly!—that if anyone put a steak in a hypersonic wind tunnel to gather better data, I’d love to see the video.
Well, I have good news.
After What If? came out, I was contacted by Tom Fisher and Thomas Rees, University of Manchester researchers studying hypersonic heat transfer. They had finished their wind tunnel experiments early, so they decided to head to the corner store, buy a steak, and gather some data.
Video 1: A Sainsbury’s 21 day matured beef steak in Mach 5 winds, recorded using Schlieren imaging to show the hypersonic shockwave
The DALL·E image generator can produce spectacular visuals, but really stumbles over text. As a result, the tourism posters it comes up with are extremely good. Visit scenic Colado! #dalle
What If 2 comes out in 2^(e^(π/ϕ)) days! If you preorder a copy you’ll get it then: amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS…
57π kilominutes until What If 2 comes out
If you preorder What If 2 now (xkcd.com/whatif2), and then start watching Jeopardy! 24 hours a day, beginning with Alex Trebek’s first episode in 1984 and skipping commercials and credits, you will catch up to the current episode right when the book arrives
I went through the dataset behind the infuriating word game Semantle (semantle.com) to try to calculate what the hardest-to-guess words would be. If regular Semantle isn’t annoying enough for you, try solving these 10 nightmare words (thread):
These aren’t obscure or specialized words; just reasonably common words without many close synonyms. We’ll start with a pretty easy one—difficulty is subjective, but I think this one isn’t too bad.
This map looks similar to some other election maps out there, but it’s a little unusual. It tries to address something that I find frustrating about election maps: Very few of them do a good job of showing where voters are. (Brief thread, because I am enthusiastic about maps!)
People often focus on the idea that election maps over-emphasize sparse rural areas with few people, but a deeper problem is that the maps imply that “areas” have political leanings at all. Spots on the map belong to many overlapping areas won by different sides.