The reality of redeploying a defeated and exhausted army is now becoming apparent to those who talked about the Russians redeploying their Kyiv forces to the Donbas. It’s now been a weak since Russian forces were almost all out of Kyiv and Chernihiv. forbes.com/sites/joewalsh…
Where are those forces now. Well best intelligence has them on their way from their withdrawal points to around Belgorod, in Russia, for rest and refit. In the US DOD briefing two days ago it was stated that these forces were still on their way.
@TheStudyofWar update last night still has these forces in this rest refit mode.
And there are these persistent reports that Russian forces are finding ways to avoid going back to Ukraine.
Add this to the fact that these forces, if they can be rested refitted, will need a significant period to deploy into Ukraine, as the road system is still working against them.
The Russians seem to be stuck by this slow motion redeploy. They are continuing their low level attacks in the Donbas. But with not enough forces to press ahead a lot, but unsure when they can receive major reinforcement. They are suffering regular attritional losses. (See ISW).
Long story short; those who talked about both the Russian Army now fighting smart according to their excellent doctrine and somehow making major gains by May 9 are looking decidedly ‘optimistic’ by Russian standards.
What it actually is looking at is Russia suffering a constant drip, drip of losses, making small gains, and instead of building up massive force for one effort, feeding forces more slowly over a poor road network. All without air dominance.
So people need to be very careful before taking about a major, large and powerful Russian offensive kicking off soon.
A picture of a bunched up convoy on the way to Donbas. No longer spread out as in pictures a few days ago, looks like a little traffic jam.
Another picture of a Russian convoy moving towards Izyum, though not 'at a breakneck' speed--to put it kindly. The Kyiv forces after resting and being resupplied are still a long way from reaching battle.
If this is actually what Russia ends up doing; they are strategically bankrupt and haven’t learned a thing. Just drip feeding forces as they become available is a recipe for Russian failure.
And personally think this is right; Give Ukraine ranged weapons. Artillery, UAVs, fixed wing aircraft, things to allow them to attack around Russian formations. keeps Ukrainian casualties down too. Should matter more than tanks.
Zelensky’s take on the need for weapons. Wants mostly ranged weapons, tanks the Ukrainians are comfortable with and armored vehicles to protect their infantry.
Reading this thread, the contrast between the clarity of Ukrainian strategic understanding and the chaos of Russian behaviour is really something.
Wow; that is quick. If the UkrainIans can get decent ranged weaponry in 48 hours that can make a big difference in the Donbas. Especially considering it will take the Russians weeks to start feeding in the Kyiv refitting forces.
Biden's transcript of his promise of aid to Ukraine is fascinating. Helicopters listed clearly. Lots of range weapons, APCs. Only thing missing from Zelensky's preferred list was fixed wing aircraft. Considering Polish visit today, maybe those are coming?
Bringing this back as the Pentagon briefing being reported by @JackDetsch is shedding even more interesting information on how the Ukrainians are fighting smart and how Russian resupply in Donbas is going.
Well if the report below is right, the Russians are still a long way from having enough force for a big encirclement of the Donbas (which they might not ever have). Pentagon saying there are only 65 Russian BTGs in Ukraine.
There has been a rather marked decrease in the estimates of Russian BTGs in Ukraine. Last week the spokesmen claimed (it what now looks to be an extraordinary intelligence error) that the Russians had 40 BTGs in the eastern region (basically Kharkiv to Izyum).
You know whose probably most affected by the sinking of the Moskva? I would say China. Another example of how this war is shaking up the strategic calculus and will, hopefully, make countries think twice about starting wars in the future.
The Moskva was the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet and was supposedly well protected by anti-missile systems. Yet the Ukrainians, who have had little experience of anti-ship missiles, have taken out this very valuable Russian asset.
In a nutshell any Chinese naval attempt to attack Taiwan, or indeed a US and allies attempt to send lots of warships near the Chinese coast, would open up the possibilities of mass numbers of Moskva’s.
This is a helpful list to understand what the US is sending to Ukraine, and what it indicates about the state of the war and, crucially what we can expect from the Ukrainian armed forces going forwards.
First, US is defintely upgrading Ukrainian capabilities. The MI 17 helicopters are interesting. Multipurpose so can’t say definitely what their use is. My best guess; to allow the Ukrainians to do more SF work behind Russian lines.
Ok, been looking forward to the transcript of the DoD briefing since the first notes this afternoon. Seemed that there was some seriously interesting information about the air war. Here is the whole transcript btw. defense.gov/News/Transcrip…
For those who dont follow regularly, I think the airpower story along with logistics are the most important indicators of the war so far. The fact the Ukraine has denied Russia air superiority over the field of battle has been hugely important.
This press conference addressed more air questions than most Ive seen. What did they say? First what are the Russians doing. Well the Russians are attacking two things it seems. First they are trying to hit Ukrainian logistics targets.
By keeping control of Kharkiv and forcing the Russians onto narrow, secondary roads it seems to be slowing down the build up of Russian forces in the Donbas.