1/ABOUT 30.
IMHO the UK now faces a crisis that is, in some ways, even greater than the one we faced when confronting Hitler. In WW2 at least we had politicians of integrity, who upheld our democratic values, and around whom the nation could unite. There was no enemy within.
2/ Today, the enemy of the people is the government itself which has become, as @Peston has noted, an elected dictatorship. Its crimes are so numerous that it has become difficult to remember them all.
3/ It isn't just #Partygate. Remember the proven corrupt process by which PPE contracts were awarded to Tory friends during the pandemic, and also remember the £billions lost to fraud. theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
4/ Remember that much of the PPE - procured in a way that gave vast profits to Tory mates - has had to be thrown away as not fit for purpose. That's your money - taxpayer money - that has been stolen. theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
5/ Remember the persistent failure of government to act, especially in the early phases of the pandemic. Johnson flounced around, avoiding COBRA meetings, and people died. They didn't get the big calls right - they got them wrong.
6/ Remember the scandal of Russian money funded into the Tory Party, a suppressed Russia report, and the appointment of the son of a KGB officer to the Lords against security service advice. theguardian.com/media/2019/nov…
7/ Remember the 'small matter' of £850/roll gold wallpaper. Johnson said he had no idea who paid for it and then it turned out (in a Whatsapp message Johnson had mysteriously forgotten about) he had asked Lord Brownlow to pay for it. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
8/ Remember also that the architect of this shitshow has previous - funneling taxpayer money to a woman he was screwing while his wife was suffering from cancer; wasting more than £40 million on a garden bridge project cooked up with his friends. metro.co.uk/2021/11/20/bor…
9/ The time has come to face up to some salient facts about the current situation and the magnitude of the danger we now face.
10/ First Johnson. As a psychologist I don't normally use diagnostic labels on people I've not met but it's clear Johnson is a psychopath. He meets most of Hare's criteria on the internationally recognized psychopathy checklist, which uses biographical data (look it up).
11/ A parallel concept from the political science literature is 'social dominance orientation (in my field it's unfortunately common for people with different specialties to come up with the same or similar concepts and give them different labels).
12/ High SDOs need to dominate and know no moral boundaries. For a good summary, read/listen to Bob Altermeyer's free (audio)book 'The authoritarians'. It will chill your bones (old Bob is a great narrator BTW): theauthoritarians.org
13/ Importantly, high SDOs know exactly which buttons to press to manipulate ordinary people who have authoritarian tendencies (people Altermeyer calls 'authoritarian followers'), who constitute about 30% of any country.
14/ How Johnson got that way is not hard to speculate. From school reports at Eton he was showing the traits early on. From Tom Bower's biography it's clear that many of his childhood experiences could be politely called 'suboptimal'. Image
15/ The point is that (except with years of therapy - unlikely) psychopaths don't change. The best predictor of their future behaviour is their past behaviour. Image
16/ Johnson has betrayed every person who has ever loved him, every child he has ever sired, everyone who has ever employed him (including 2 PMs). He has been fired twice for lying. In the end, he will betray everyone in the country.
17/ The problem of having a psychopath running the country is not just the psychopath. It's the fact that psychopathic behaviour becomes contagious - he appoints other unprincipled people around him; they copy his style. The result is a PATHOCRACY. thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-34/nove…
18/ Which leads me to the threat to democracy. Because serial lying is one of the defining characteristics of a psychopath, we have a government of liars. The British system has weak checks and balances, and the constitution is unwritten, so democratic standards are destroyed.
19/ Be of no doubt: THIS COULD END VERY BADLY. In a pathocracy, the government will break every convention, bend every rule, lie and cheat to hang on to power. (Hence, their naked refusal to follow constitutional convention on misleading Parliament).
20/ The point is that psychopaths/high SDOs DO NOT THINK THE RULES (any rules) APPLY TO THEM. At best, expect lying on an epic scale in the run-up to the next GE. At worst, expect underhand tricks to activate authoritarian followers, and to deter some people from voting.
21/ Unless stopped, the best we'll end up with will be an Orban-style elected dictatorship in complete control of the media (it's no coincidence they're emasculating Channel 4); at worst the complete subjugation of Parliamentary democracy.
22/ I've avoided mentioning Brexit thus far (everyone knows it's an obsession) but I should point out that this is where the lies started and that it was the vehicle by which we ended up with this pathocratic government.
23/ What is to be done? It is five minutes to midnight but it is not too late. BUT THOSE ON THE SIDE OF TRUTH AND DEMOCRACY NEED TO GET THEIR SHIT TOGETHER PRONTO.
24/ First, the surest way of getting rid of this threat to democracy is for progressives, WHO ACTUALLY ARE A MAJORITY IN THIS COUNTRY, to build an alliance. That means @UKLabour, @TheGreenParty and @LibDems.
25/ I've heard all the arguments against a progressive alliance and none of them hold water when judged against the threat we face. There are many ways of doing it BUT IT MUST BE DONE.

FIGURE IT OUT FOLKS!
26/ A progressive alliance must be linked to constitutional reform. IMHO FPTP is at the root of many of our problems; it facilitates elected dictatorship and it stifles new, young political voices emerging outside the two-party system.
27/ Something also needs to be done to make the constitutional conventions binding. If a PM can be proven to lie to Parliament he should get his marching orders, without a doubt.
28/ The second thing we must do is get out young adult voters. They have been shafted by the Tories (astronomic and increasing uni fees; less job security than their parents; EU rights taken away; home ownership a distant dream). They hate the Tories for good reason.....
29/....but they don't vote. How do we get them to vote? I don't know but progressives in this country need to figure this out and fast. Do we campaign in unis? Do we find more people like @Femi_Sorry who can reach out to them and inspire them?
30/ Third, the opposition needs to fucking well OPPOSE. The huge elephant in the room is Brexit. I understand now is not the time to talk about rejoining but it is the time to talk about the harms being done by the type of Brexit we have now. Image
31/ I've written an analysis of this before. TL:DR the public is open to the idea of a closer working relationship with Europe. A BETTER DEAL WITH EUROPE IS A VOTE WINNER.
32/ So opposition politicians, particularly in @UKLabour need to do some hard thinking and get their Brexit story right. Because the Tories are going to try to use Brexit as one of their authoritarian-activating tricks in the next election.
33/ @UKLabour just saying they support Brexit as it is won't work, IMHO. It sounds disingenuous. But saying we will reverse Brexit will play into Tory hands. A better deal with Europe, correctly explained, is the right approach.
34/ What to do about the @Conservatives? It's time to recognise that the Tory Party is actually dead, as I've tweeted about before:
35/ At some point, decent Tories (there are some) are going to have to do something to restore their party and root out the racist, nationalist entryists who have taken over. It will be a tough job.
36/ So that's my rant for today. I'm so damned angry at the bastards who are destroying my country. IMHO the time for civil disobedience in near; we are at the last chance saloon. The country may not survive.
Footnote #1. Yesterday I predicted that the psychopaths in charge will do anything to activate their authoritarian followers. No step will be too low. Today they announced this: theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/a…
A quote from the American historian (and Russia expert) Timothy Snyder seems pertinent: Image
39/ Footnote #2. A few people have questioned my use of the term psychopath to describe Johnson, either because it seems hypocritical (I'm a well-known critic of psychiatric diagnoses) or ethics (is it right to use the label with someone I haven't met?).
40/ On the science, there is extensive research on psychopathy, which belongs to the group of personality disorders (PDs; persistent dysfunctional ways of relating to others) rather than mental illnesses. True that there is considerable debate about how PDs should be classified.
41/ For example, in American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5 'antisocial personality disorder' is included, but is a broader concept than psychopathy. But many personality researchers and forensic psychologists/psychiatrists do use the concept of psychopathy.
42/ Canadian psychologist Robert Hare developed a widely-used 20-item checklist for diagnosing psychopathy, which is largely based on biographical data. You can find many accounts online and also in Jon Ronson's amusing book 'The psychopath test'.
43/ Researchers on psychopathy have always claimed that highly psychopathic people may be found in the upper echelons of business, politics etc. This is the central theme of Ronson's book (Hare taught him how to use the checklist).
44/ To my mind, psychopathy has better validity than the schizophrenia diagnosis, which I have been critical of for many years (not because classifying people is wrong but because there is no schizophrenia syndrome; this is now widely accepted in psychiatry).
45/ As to the ethics, it is true that the American Psychiatric Association has a rule - the Goldwater rule - that prohibits their members from commenting on the mental health of politicians (after many did about Barry Goldwater).
46/ I'd like to point out that I am neither American nor a psychiatrist (I'm a clinical psychologist) but it is reasonable to counter that that's not the point. But, as psychiatrists in the US have found with Trump, in some circumstances the wisdom of the Goldwater rule is tested
47/ The whole point about people with PDs is that they keep repeating the same dysfunctional behaviours. Whether or not the psychopathy label is correct, he exemplifies this in spades.
48/ At one time or another, he has pretty much betrayed every person who has ever loved him, and everyone he has ever worked for. He is a pathological liar and he's not going to change.
49/ This raises the question of why so many people - the very people he will surely betray - are won over by him? Why doesn't his track record make people shun him? This is an important psychological question that I don't have an answer to, except to point out....
50/ ..that 'glib superficial charm' is the first item on Hare's psychopathy checklist. Bottom line - Johnson seems to be a superbly skilled conman (I don't get it, but he seems to fool millions).
51/ The ethical judgment is difficult but, in these worrying times I am bound to ask: what is the ethical cost of not pointing out what I see? Johnson will continue to behave as he is, and he has already done immense damage to this country.
52/END Footnote #2. I realized what sort of person Johnson was before he became PM. As it has turned out, he has been even worse, and more stereotypically psychopathic, than I anticipated. He is a clear and present danger to the wellbeing of this country.
53/Footnote #3. Last night the government passed legislation that will allow them to limit who can vote, reduce independent oversight over elections, and arrest protestors who they deem too noisy. Enough said.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Bentall #FBPE Woke and proud

Richard Bentall #FBPE Woke and proud Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardBentall

Mar 10
Growth is much misunderstood, especially by Brexiters. Buckle up for a short 🧵

1/23 Growth is annual change in GDP expressed as a %. So if GDP in year 1 = £2 trillion (approx UK GDP in 2016) and in year 2 = £2.02 trillion, growth is 1%.

Prolonged negative growth = recession.
2/ To calculate GDP, the ONS uses all sorts of measurements which are subject to uncertainty, so the numbers are often revised. Recently, they changed the method of calculation, causing previous estimates to be revised up. ons.gov.uk/economy/grossd…
3/ BUT because growth is expressed as a %, the same level of growth in a rich economy (eg US, Europe) equals a much greater increase in wealth than for a poor economy (1% of £2 trillion = £20 billion; 1% of £2 billion = £20 million).
Read 23 tweets
Jan 5
1/4 🧵about fake economists.

A strange thing just happened when I responded to the IEA's @cjsnowdon's claim that the NHS was awash with money. His wiki bio says that he did an undergrad degree in Lancs so I asked him to justify his claim to be an economist.

Then he blocked me. Image
2/4 Which got me thinking about the qualifications of other so-called economists associated with the IEA, such as @CeeMacBee.
3/4 And the ever-on-our screens @KateAndrs, formerly of the IEA, now the Spectator economic editor (here quoted in the Express in 2017), whose only economics qualification seems to be a masters in philosophy and international relations at St Andrews. Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 2, 2023
1/17 It's time to join some dots and talk about one of the very worst effects of Brexit.

I am not talking about the economy. I am talking about its impact on honesty in public life and the integrity of our institutions. A 🧵
2/ So far, the national conversation has been about effects on trade, growth, etc. There's no doubt about a negative impact. Brexiters who once boasted of unicorns, now perform cognitive acrobatics to argue things aren't quite as shit as remainers say.
3/ While all this has been going on, the disintegration of our standards in public life has been plain for all to see. Some of this is being laid bare by the COVID inquiry, and its stories of incompetence and personality disorder at the heart of government (shocking but expected)
Read 17 tweets
Aug 23, 2023
1/20 As desperate Brexit fanatics make bogus claims about the UK outperforming the EU, I thought it might be useful to gather together a few facts.
2/ First up, the £, here compared to a basket of foreign currencies. Something seems to have happened to it in 2016. Image
3/ You might expect a falling £ to improve exports and Brexit fanatics have been boasting that they are soaring. However, they have conveniently forgotten the effect of inflation as explained here in the recent (May 11th) House of Commons Library report. Image
Read 20 tweets
Aug 17, 2023
1/13

A brief thread for any ‘A’ level students collecting their results today (and their anxious parents).

I’d like to tell you my story about how I screwed up my ‘A’ levels - TWICE!
2/ First time (C,E,F) at a well known public school which charged huge sums from my (actually not very rich) parents to tell them I was not very bright and, anyway, was too interested in psychology for my own good.
3/ Second time (A,C,E) when I repeated the year at a local comprehensive (and discovered both alcohol and the interesting half of my species that didn’t play rugby, which was a bit distracting).
Read 13 tweets
Aug 3, 2023
1/11 🧵

A sincere apology to all remaining Brexiters.

Yesterday I tweeted a simple and harmless anecdote from my travels in France for the amusement of followers (>3k have found it amusing so far).

I had no idea that it would trigger Brexiters so much.
2/11

There seems to be a bit of a theme in the way you reacted to it. Have you been talking amongst yourselves? You all seem pretty desperate to believe it didn't happen (it did).


Image
Image
Image
Image
3/11

So I ask myself, why were so many of you upset by it?

Could it be because many of you seem to have few friends and are lonely? Or maybe you are shy, lacking the confidence to use your own name?


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(