As every day goes past that the Russian doesn’t happen, we have to ask ourselves:
Are the Russian forces not actually able to generate a manoeuvre force over and above what they need to hold the line in Donbas?
Not clear yet.
Things that could change this include the Russians taking Mariupol completely. This would free up some Russian forces for the wider Donbas. But they will be exhausted so not a huge amount of use.
These ideas of Russian forces encircling the Ukrainians in Donbas seem far fetched. It doesn’t appear that the Russians can generate the manoeuvre force.
Of course generating manoeuvre is the main challenge for both forces when numbers are roughly the same. It is only by ambitious manoeuvre that you create local 3:1 overmatch to enable you to defeat small groups/pockets of enemy.
It seems to me only the Ukrainians can do that.
I’ve argued before: they need bold manoeuvre to places like Kherson, Crimea etc to dislocate the Russians.
And every day the Russians don’t attack in Donbas makes it harder for the Russians, as the Ukrainians are getting more and more equipment from the west. Vehicles in particular are key (obviously!) for manoeuvre.
I’ll update this thread as more becomes clear.
Whether Mariupol falls is key. But I’m not sure it will ever ‘fall’ enough for the Russians to move troops out
And all this by May 9th? Looking unlikely.
Supposedly the Russians have captured the seaport in Mariupol.
Ok fine.
Now clear the 500 cellars in the city full of Ukrainians waiting to counter attack.
Increasingly Mariupol is looking like a Ukrainian sacrifice to keep the Russians fixed.
Ok now we’re talking. The Ukrainians hitting that ship is exactly what they should be doing: bold ambitious targeting of Russians assets and positions to put them off balance snd overload their decision making this blunting activity in Donbas.
Ship abandoned. All crew off the Russians say. But it was on fire for a while so they will have lost crew. Question is how many
What is also interesting is that over the last 24 hours I’ve seen a huge interested in Russian bot activity attacking this account (it’s so laughable what they come up with but there you go)
This tells me that the Russians are planning something fairly soon. Doing info ops before the offensive etc.
Now if I can work that out from Twitter, you can bet your bottom dollar the Ukrainians and their western intelligence colleagues knew that.
Hitting the ship was great. Just pushes them off balance at the right time
I hope the Ukrainians have a long list of strategic targets like that
Predictable the Russians were just mooching around off the coast on a predictable patrol pattern.
How did the collapse of British military power lead to the latest Donald Trump outburst on Greenland?
A 🧵 (with some 🖍️)
Trump said yesterday that he wouldn’t rule out military force to bring Greenland under US control. Greenland is the largest island in the world and in a critical strategic position - of which more later
Of course - Greenland isn’t as big as this map suggests - which looks like it does as the map projection enlarges territory closer to the poles. But it is still pretty big, and pretty important.
Today we call on the Government to investigate with our allies how to seize $300bn of frozen Russian state assets to fund Ukraine’s victory
There is an unanswerable moral, strategic and legal case for the use of Russian state assets to support Ukraine in its war effort. It’s never been more urgent than in a world where the incoming US administration might be pulling the plug on support for Ukraine.
Today this issue will be debated in the House of Commons where we will call on the government to act, and act now.
The last week has seem some momentous changes in Syria.
Here are some first thoughts.
A 🧵
Firstly, we should see the fall of the House of Assad as a function of a weak and rotten Syrian government, and stretched and weakened allies of Iran and Russia - more than HTS or any other rebel movement becoming vastly more competent.
The Assad government has grown progressively weaker - this generally happens when corruption is utterly rampant - I mean who wants to die when your officers are skimming your pay and selling your ammunition?
Let’s take a look at the economic side of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
A 🧵
Once wars go beyond a couple of months, they tend to become a battle of the economies—that is, who is will to turn a bigger part of their economy into a machine that produces arms and munitions.
Obviously, if you have two sides that are both willing to turn as much as possible of their economies over to the war, then the side with the bigger economy will tend to win (all other things being equal).
The US has decided to allow Ukraine to use longer-range missiles in Russia.
This brings to a close a pretty feckless period of US policy towards Ukraine.
A 🧵
It’s quite hard to even work out what the White House is trying to do these days, apart from vainly responding to events.
Let’s dig into it.
This permissions - that Ukraine be allowed to use the longer range US supplied ATACAMS missiles (range 300km) inside Russia - is all of a piece with a series of decisions stretching right back to 2014.