Holy Thursday good wishes to all celebrating Easter:
"Before the feast of Passover, Jesus knew that His hour had come to pass from this world to the Father. He loved His own in the world and He loved them to the end" (John 13:1)
"But he was pierced for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his wounds we are healed." (Isaiah 53:5)
It is interesting the number of people who find Good Friday hard - the betrayal, the disloyalty, the widowed Virgin Mary watches her son’s brutal, public death, with the women of Jerusalem & only John the youngest apostle who goes to the trial & Calvary (too young to know better)
Meanwhile Peter, leader of the apostles, has denied Jesus to a literal nobody and seemingly run away. The other Apostles may be on the fringes of Pilate’s trial but only John the youngest (in a culture of old) is too uncorrupted to preserve himself. John goes to Calvary
The crucifixion was deliberately gruesome. The condemned was not only executed but forced to carry the means of their execution. It was the common, public Roman punishment for criminals, slaves, non Romans esp, as a means of deterring others. To many, Good Friday was another day
Pilate was the classic governing class apparatchik, even in Roman times, hoping for promotion. Order in notoriously difficult Judea had to be kept, regardless, and though Pilate’s inquiries had made clear where justice lay, the reality was Barrabas won the popular vote…
Even Pilate's wife had warned him not to do the unjust ... and yet Pilate did .... all of the best of what Rome & its laws was nothing because of the weakness of one Roman governor. And so the crucifixion of the suffering servant was to occur, as the prophet Isaiah had foretold.
At the Crucifixion itself, Jesus' cross was between two thieves - one mocked him, another, the good thief, corrected his fellow thief & recognised Jesus' saving power, even then & there, for which the good thief, despite his life of crime, was promised paradise.
At the foot of the Cross was the Virgin Mary, the apostle John, and many of the women who had followed Jesus .... in a literally patriarchal society, the men Jesus thought His friends had run for their lives, leaving only the women & a guy too young to know he should save himself
It had been a big week - Jesus entered triumphantly into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, as if a King. By Good Friday, he has been tried, condemned, scourged & crucified, with a cynical inscription by Pilate on the Cross' head referring to what kingship had been claimed.
For all of the supposedly revolutionary and messianic zeal, all of those alleged zealots, it was left to a rich, establishment, fellow, Joseph of Arimathea - a man with much to lose - to go to Pilate & claim Jesus' body for burial, which this Joseph buried in his own tomb.
At the Cross, Jesus' body is held by his mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary: “Behold, this child is appointed for the fall and rising of many in Israel & a sign that is opposed. A sword will pierce your own soul also, so that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed” (Luke 2:34-35)
Good morning to all on this Holy Saturday
"For this is why the Gospel was preached even to those who are dead" (1 Peter 4:6)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Small thread on the Federal ICAC/public integrity body debate, noting that I ranted when it was unfashionable & at some length on @ABCthedrum about political insiders & corruption when a former Defence Minister got a job with a Defence consulting firm.
At the Federal level, corrupt acts and defrauding the Commonwealth etc are already crimes that are investigated by the AFP and, where evidence supports a prosecution, brought to trial. Having a separate 'public integrity' body will not alter this or improve this, per se.
If the issue is former politicians "cashing in" after holding a public office (esp lobbying) then there are straightforward legislative barriers that can be easily erected against former MPs and Senators performing relevant private sector work, consistent with our Constitution.
Anthony Albanese giving a good response on the trans issue - asked about saying he is not woke - he respects every person as they are. Then cuts it off. Albo now to the Right of Matt Kean. The old Left was many things but pretty normal on these issues.
Am a contrarian by nature (have contempt for people too sure of themselves ... you can be somewhat sure...) but I am not sure Albanese is doing as badly as everyone here says. All elections are referenda on incumbents. As John Howard said, you cannot fatten the pig on market day
If you are a Right of centre political party and you have not - in a parliamentary system - ruthlesly expanded home ownership esp among younger demographics in key seats, you run into trouble, electorally. You are relying on your opponent making too many mistakes.
I saw this in @Quillette by Ron Radosh (a very good historian) on new @compactmag_ - I read this less about @SohrabAhmari 's magazine itself than so much of the political Right's failure to accept it is not 1985 anymore ie the Right needs 'regime change'
You do not need to be a political anthropologist to see the Right has its divides - but esp they exist around age (do you remember Thatcher/Reagan?) and wealth (do you have secure work? do you somewhat/own your home?). If both "No", you probably do not care about Ukraine. Sorry
The major problem the Right has is it is meant to be founded in "conservatism". The question asked by many is what is being conserved? The breakdown of family? The indenture of young people so they can never own a home & form a family? The conservative inc people have no answers
As one of the few who was critical of the Germans & their energy dependency on the Russians long before it was fashionable here, it is amazing to see blue chekists here - who had lauded Merkel - now pretending to be critical of long established German, indeed European, policy
At the same time, the Germans are the 'human shield' for most Europeans, who want business as usual restored with Russia as soon as is reasonably possible, especially cheap energy. The further you are from the continent's Russian frontier, the less you care about Ukraine.
All of the Europeans who really want a confrontation with Russia are here tweeting away - in English! - on Twitter. Europe is an old place full of people whose ancestors were survivors and who care only as much as they have to do so about 'the current thing'.
Given how much pro Ukraine propaganda is allowed here of the “Ghost of Kiev” - which even the most credulous American neocons gave up believing in - am curious what @RWApodcast did here to get suspended as it was often very critical of Kremlin policy
Much of the reason the absurd ghosts of Kiev / Azov Nazis lines get traction is mainstream media do not have their own journalists in Ukraine. I get media do not want journos killed etc but the job done properly has risks & getting killed in a war you are covering is one of them
The fact the Blue Chekists media here retweet and promote obviously nonsense stories about Ukrainian successes in the war (the same Russian tank being destroyed each day etc but weirdly without Russian markings) shows a sheer lack of much needed understanding & scepticism.