Banjot Kaur Profile picture
Apr 14 10 tweets 3 min read
The #WHO on April 2 issued a statement saying the supply of #Covaxin to UN agencies had been suspended due to "deficiencies in good manufacturing practices". There were not mny details. In an email, they have now told @TheWireScience the following : science.thewire.in/health/who-cov… (1/n)
"Problems were detected in some parts of the manufacturing process. SOME CHANGES WERE MADE after the emergency-use license was granted but were not submitted to the national drug regulator and WHO for evaluation and validation."
The WHO still didn't specify what were those changes. Whether those changes were related to increase the yield, or on the front of raw materials or due to some other reason--we don't know. A GMP expert said major changes, if done post approval, have to be informed.
WHO also said, "The inspections observation indicated that there are gaps in the quality assurance mechanisms and hence the need to take precautionary measures until the gaps have been addressed." (The measure being the suspension of supply; asking countries to take app action)
Again, the WHO didn't specify what those "gaps"were. When further prodded, the WHO advised that I should seek further information from #BharatBiotech because disclosing more details would mean breach of confidentiality on the part of WHO.
The WHO didn't say anything if the findings of Brazilian regulator and its own were similar at any point. However, it did say this was first onsite inspection of Covaxin manufacturing facility.
Sent a detailed questionnaire to Bharat Biotech on advise of WHO, asking it about the UN body's statement and few questions about the company's own press release issued a day prior to WHO's statement release. Went unanswered; as were the questions sent to #DCGI.
The role, or rather absence of any role of DCGI, whatsoever, has baffled experts. Covaxin is the first and only EUL Covid vaccine against which the WHO's has issued such a kind of statement; still the regulator has not said about its follow-up actions. It has remained silent.
When I asked WHO what facility upgrade is it expecting the Bharat Biotech to undertake, it said a CAPA plan will be prepared by the company concerned only and submitted to the regulator, DCGI. They will be coordinating with him. Any other action is mandate of DCGI, it said.
What some experts also wondered was why WHO had not given more details of its inspection, and, on the other hand, it suspended the supply to UN agencies. The experts felt that WHO ought to have more transparent in the interest of people. More science.thewire.in/health/who-cov… (n/n)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Banjot Kaur

Banjot Kaur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Banjotkaur

Mar 3
TRUST DRUG CONTROLLER: Paul's response in @MoHFW_INDIA press conference today, responding to a question why no data in public domain on #Corbevax
@TheWireScience
Thanks @monikareporter for asking a pointed question.
Paul: "Corbevax, clearly, the EUA has been given for adult and children. Be rest assured that the data has been by drug regulator. Be also rest assured for both these groups is being reviewed by the NTAGI because we work in tandem."+
Read 7 tweets
Mar 1
UNTIMELY death of a loved one, even if it has happened more than a decade ago, is an extremely difficult fact to come to terms with. Two days ago a friend and I, out of nowhere, went discussing about last 11 days of another friend who died for want of a liver transplant+
She was our batchmate during graduation at a Varanasi univ. She continued to pursue Master’s from there, I moved to Delhi. We were 21. One fine day during our PG days, we got to know she was suffering from liver cirrhosis—otherwise a totally fit person.
This was 4 days after she got was with ‘jaundice' and we kept talking—we thought it would be just fine.

4 days later got a call saying ur friend has bcm unconsciousness from somebody who knew her. I dialled friends in the univ.With their help she got admitted at the varsity hosp
Read 16 tweets
Dec 4, 2020
At times, one has to write just to record for the history. That, a country's regulator invites media for webinar on clinical trials and when a question is asked, the reply is this 👇
"My request was to limit the question regarding understanding the processes involved. About the specifics of the things you are questioning, there are forums…there are weekly press conferences by department / ministry. This question can be asked there."
downtoearth.org.in/news/health/dr…
Other issues related to CTs which were asked but were not taken up due to 'paucity of time':

The composition of ethics committees of institutions where these trials are going on

The role Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation’s own subject expert committee
Read 4 tweets
Dec 3, 2020
So a media report says #DCGI has refuted any causal link between the serious adverse event (SAE) and #SII COVID vaccine trial participant. When we posed ques to the health ministry secy on December 1, he asked us to look into New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules, 2019 (1/n)
What these Rules say (in case the death hasn't occurred)
1. The sponsor and the investigator shall forward their reports on an SAE to the Central Licencing Authority (DCGI), ethics committee and the head of the institution where the trial was conducted within 14 days of SAE(2/n)
2. The ethics committee shall forward the report and compensation to be given by the sponsor within 30 days of knowing that the SAE had occurred.
3. The DCGI shall pass an order or constitute an expert committee. (3/n)
Read 7 tweets
Apr 4, 2020
We know the idea of asking reporters to put quests on @MoHFW_INDIA WA group before #pressers has been farcical. Not only quests are cherry-picked, hardly 1 or 2 are taken up. Here's a thread of quests which went #unanswered on #Apr_3. #IndiaFightsCoronavirus by #GaggingPress.
1.Out of all the tests done in India so far, can Dr Gangakhedkar clarify how many individual people been tested,and how many second, third, fourth tests etc have been done?- Some states have announced they will expand testing criteria from ICMR's criteria. Are they allowed?
2. Will those positive results be accepted by the Centre?
3. How many ILI and SARI patients come up in hospitals across the country over the last two weeks?Also, how many samples of such patient have sentinel surveillance been conducted on?
4. How many Docs are tested positive
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(