It's akin to saying someone has a bone marrow disorder as a cause for anemia.
Unless you know the specific disease, you cannot approach therapy or prognosis. Just attributing a kidney problem to a monoclonal protein is not enough for deciding therapy or counseling.
2/
So you need to need to both know the specific pathology AND be confident that the pathology is causally related to the monoclonal protein and not a coincidental association.
3/
For example if you think someone has monoclonal gammopathy causing renal damage, you have to first make the specific diagnosis: light chain deposition disease, C3 glomerulonephritis, Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, Fanconi's, etc.
4/
Next step would be to exclude other causes and have enough evidence that a clonal process is causing the damage. Eg., glomerular deposits that are kappa and not lambda.
Just saying "MGRS" is a equal to a colloquially saying someone has a bone marrow process causing anemia.
5/
Monoclonal proteins are found in 5% of the general population over age 50. So in every disease if you go looking, 5% of people will have an M protein. Most are coincidental.
The onus is on us to do the right work up as needed to ensure that the association is causal.
6/
Over 150 diseases have been "associated" with a monoclonal protein. Most are coincidental.
There are real associations. Terms like MGRS, MGCS are to remind people to consider the real association when clinical features fit the likelihood of the M protein being the culprit.
7/
But they are not names of diseases. Even if proteinuria is causally related to the monoclonal protein you still need to know the pathology: is it proliferative GN, light chain deposition etc. Otherwise you cannot treat or counsel.
8/
For conditions like peripheral neuropathy consider that there are 100s of causes of neuropathy, of which MGUS is one. And it's usually not the problem. And even if it is, trying to eradicate it (treatment) may be worse than the clinical problem.
9/
With people ordering protein electrophoresis and light chains a lot we find a lot of coincidental associations. There is risk of inappropriate treatment.
So don't write MGRS as diagnosis without stating the name of the renal pathology & why u are sure it is a clonal process
10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Covid vaccines represent one of the greatest medical advances of all time. They have dramatically reduced risk of severe disease and death.
But they have worked less well in terms of preventing infections, transmission, or durability.
Why?
1/
2/ Covid vaccines were developed rapidly. Although an effective schedule was established, there simply wasn't time to find the optimal schedule.
In retrospect, the first 2 doses were given too close to each other. Also, a 3rd dose should have been part of the primary schedule.
3/ A million daily cases means too much opportunity for the virus to mutate. More replication = more chance for variants that are vaccine evasive, more transmissible, more serious, or all of the above.
In fact it's a miracle that vaccines retained efficacy against severe disease
Note that less than half the people who are eligible for the first booster have had it. So our booster plan is not going very well. We need more education around it's importance.
The data for efficacy of first booster dose is compelling from many sources. Including the following study.
The rise in cases in many parts of Asia doesn't mean their policies failed, or that covid precautions don't work, or that masks are theater.
These countries held the pandemic in check for 2 years. They already saved a lot of lives in the process. Nothing can take away from it.
Omicron and BA.2 are causing problems because they are much more contagious, and some precautions were relaxed. But these variants face a well vaccinated population in these countries.
There is morbidity & mortality from these variants because not everyone is vaccinated, and some people (advanced age and immunocompromised) are vulnerable despite vaccination; Also because vaccines reduce risk of death by >90%, but not 100%.
3/ The problem was our vaccination rate was just not high enough.
In addition:
-people fatigued after 2 years relaxed precautions
-many underestimated omicron as a mild cold
-some people remain vulnerable despite vaccination
-children age <5 didn't have access to vaccines