1/. Why do you think #peacestudies exist to prevent wars? War, declared or not, is #stateterrorism by people in uniform, is the ultimate crime, is the sumum malum: The culmination & consecration of the #violencesjg. The surprise about Bucha et al. is for the naïve. This is war.
2/. There is no escaping the horrors of warfare. In any war. Rules, standards & legal consequences of jus ad bellum & in bello notwithstanding, war is an illegitimate means that poisons whatever ends it pursues. Pay attention to its implication here: war, INCLUDING defensive war,
3/. is polluted by the practice of warfare, which by definition mobilizes peak ingenuity for the worst anti-human acts that humans are capable of. War is a means, that never dignifies but tarnishes the goals pursued.However legitimate a self-defense war is, it cannot escape that.
4/. Differences are made about decorum, intent, proportionality, degree, quantity & quality of brutality. Fine. OR you can take my stance of principle: war is always an illegitimate avenue, to be precluded&prevented failing which it must be exited at the very 1st exit available.
5/. From my radical ANTI-VIOLENCE pov, which you are invited to espouse, [and here a tiny classificatory remark is of import: war, despite the intergenerational & civilizational trauma-footprint it leaves, is merely a subcategory of #directviolence with a nasty napoleon complex.]
6/. the real, the investigative questions AD PACEM then spell out as i.e:
1) who or what stood in the way of prevention? 2) who or what stands in the way of an IMMEDIATE exit out of this war? 3) who or what benefits from the current maintainance & continuation of said war?
7/. Though such a #peaceresearch investigation will produce that information too as a byproduct while pursuing our final purpose (namely "how do we create nonviolent interaction where we now have a war"),the questions in 6/. aren't pursued to find who to blame, shame & prosecute.
8/. We leave that task to duly mandated legalists: Theirs, at this junction, is not to advance #positivepeacejg, but to judge over the data produced by the past & assign punishment as ordained by some codified law; just the types of things done under conditions of #negativepeace.
9/. Correct answers to these questions below are necessary from a logical & #peacepolitics perspective, because identifying those actors & factors informs us about who & what delays the rational & systematic implementation of nonviolent interaction.
1/13 Happy to announce that we've finished designing an all new online masterclass "THE ART OF PEACE" with my close colleague & good friend @Irenologist at the Galtung-Institut. Luckily I don't have to do it all by myself. I'll be available for deep Q&As. Below are our 12 themes:
What do I mean by art in the "art of peace" & creativity?
Art refers to reacting spontaneously to spontaneity. Creativity refers to calling into reality something new, that wasnt there before. Intuition is of the essence. Prepare for the unpreparable. Expect the unexpected.
What happens to our professionalism? Standardization in our field. It is the framing within which we move creatively. But to stick to our routines as peace professionals is to stick to the ANSWERS we have found so far. But more important are the QUESTIONS we are yet to answer.
For the latter we need both the creativity & and the courage of artists.
@rkelly123@LukeshRoberts 1) Both And all the way down indeed. One of my key books is „Peace by Peaceful means“. The title (Pure Gandhi btw.) from a praxeological p.o.v, stipulates that THIS type of goal is obtained & contained in its means. Ex negativo, see: „bombing for peace is like f*g for virginity“
🟠A) attitudinal & normative dispositions legitimizing it,
🟢B) behavioral expressions negating the 4 basic human needs #BHNjg of others &
🟣C) contradictions between autotelic & heterotelic goals within or between actors;
USA: In numerous horrendous arrest videos that are indistinguishable from assault videos with black victims at the hands of Policemen & women, one thing is becomes clear: Crossing paths with police in the USA while black is the closest thing to an extrajudicial death sentence.
To all currently engaged in fixing this unacceptable state of affairs in the USA, I say this: you will achieve nothing durable or deep unless you deconstruct & redefine the very political ethos at the heart of that country’s perception of itself, or else;
this “As abroad, so within!” culture of the US executive branch, which has become apparent to all, will continue unabated. This is a transformative moment to be seized, not only at superficial levels of “police reform in race relations” but deeper, questioning the very legitimacy
@philippefroguel@oslouniversity@haaretzcom Eh ben dites donc. Écoutez, j’ai visité l’Israel 39 fois depuis 1960. J’ai espoir qu’un jour l’Israel dont rêvaient Buber & Einstein fasse surface. Il y’a dans la vision de mon ami desormais mort Uri Avnery quelquechose de constructif. Israel doit dialoguer mieux. Pas plus.
@philippefroguel@oslouniversity@haaretzcom Il me semble que vous ne comprenez rien aux fondements de l’irénologie. Ce qui est dommage mais le choix est le vôtre de jeter ou non un regard dans ce domaine de la géopolitique. A ne pas confondre: Polémologie. Je vais ici faire un effort sincère d’élucidation de mon approche.