Alex Epstein Profile picture
Apr 15 9 tweets 6 min read
Catastrophizer @ClimateOfGavin has for years been smearing me on Twitter without any argument.

Now he thinks he's found some silver bullet to discredit me.

Here's a quick debunking of what Gavin says and a broader exposé of his embarrassing intellectual conduct on Twitter.
🧵👇
Here's the post @ClimateOfGavin called "flat out 💩 from Epstein."

It's a quote from 1986--keep track of the year, as Gavin will soon confuse it with 1988--where the NYT reports on claims made by James Hansen. I shared a chart of those claims vs. reality.
My point in this post, and in my #Catastrophizing series more broadly, is that the institutions and people we trust to give us expert knowledge give us wild overestimates of the negatives of fossil fuels.

This clearly happened with the @nytimes in 1986.
One key #Catastrophizing practice is to misrepresent the state of science--e.g., taking a scientist with the most extreme negative view and portraying them as mainstream. Or: misrepresenting a scientist.

If NYT misrepresented Hansen in 1986, it's just further proof of my point.
Instead of trying to understand my point about the NYT's #Catastrophizing in *1986*, @ClimateOfGavin uses the 💩 emoji and goes on a rant about Hansen's work in *1988*! This is the level of rigor I've come to expect from Gavin over the years.
👇
Here's my first ever interaction with @ClimateOfGavin, which began with an incredibly rude and empty attack by him.

Gavin never responded to my offer, and he clearly has never read my book--certainly not if "reading" includes any modicum of comprehension.

CC @mattwridley
I reached out repeatedly to @ClimateOfGavin to oppose despicable propaganda by the entity he runs: @NASAClimate. Maybe he should focus on fixing that instead of making sloppy attacks against me.
Here's the climate trash that @ClimateOfGavin not only allowed to be published, but still allows to be up!

Gavin needs to apologize to me, and he needs to have @NASAClimate apologize for this #Catastrophizing.

If he does either I will pleasantly shocked.
To learn more about the error of #Catastrophizing, and how it leads the public to be fundamentally misinformed about the state of science, check out Fossil Future.

Here's an excerpt from Chapter 2, which is called "Catastrophizing Side-Effects."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Epstein

Alex Epstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexEpstein

Apr 15
For Earth Day, Apple is donating $1 of every Apple Pay purchase to @WWF.

WWF is a *rabidly anti-nuclear organization*~~meaning that it’s helping stop by far the most promising form of noncarbon energy.

Tell @Apple to cancel this promotion and end its other anti-nuclear efforts.
World Wildlife Fund’s official position paper on nuclear says:

“WWF has a vision for the future which phases out the use of fossil fuel and nuclear”

Anyone who cares about CO2 emissions *and* values energy should dissociate from the anti-nuclear @WWF.
Apple engages in anti-nuclear propaganda by promoting exclusively “renewable” energy, excluding nuclear, and falsely claiming to be “100% renewable.”

(When I exposed the “100%” lie in @forbes in 2016, @tim_cook got Forbes to spike my article for 5 days.)
forbes.com/sites/alexepst…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 13
Dems are trying everything imaginable to lower oil/gasoline prices except *the thing that would actually work*: STOP THREATENING THE EXISTENCE OF THE OIL INDUSTRY.

Instead of acknowledging their key role in increasing oil prices, Dems are engaging in epic denial tactics.

🧵👇
For 15+ years Democratic politicians, including Joe Biden, have relentlessly attacked oil investment, oil production, and oil transport—leading to higher prices and lower security.

Instead of taking credit for their "success," they are denying that they are anti-fossil fuels! Image
The "business decisions" denial tactic

For 15+ years Democratic politicians have pushed everything they can to threaten new oil production: net-zero, ESG, proposed bans, etc.

Now they are blaming companies for "business decisions" to refrain from threatened oil production! Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 8
The climate catastrophist establishment fears me and Fossil Future so much that they *fund Google ads to smear me*.

PS While this group publicly smears me as a "climate science denier" to Google searchers, their long article offers no evidence for this claim. (None exists.)
Here's why the climate catastrophist establishment is afraid of me.
When smart people read my work with an open mind, their minds often change. For example, energy entrepreneur, investor, and writer @BrianGitt.

The climate catastrophist establishment can't tolerate losing hearts and minds--so they respond with smears.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 8
Good news!

My successful preemption of The Washington Post's planned "racism" hit-piece is now a national news story. Thanks to @FoxNews's @briansflood for the accurate reporting.

Please share this story to help other innocent people defend themselves.
foxnews.com/media/author-a…
Here's my original preemption of The Washington Post's planned "racism" hit-piece, which was intended to cancel me and my new book Fossil Future.
Here's the victorious end to my preemption of The Washington Post's attempt to cancel me.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 7
This @BrianGitt guy asked for a copy of Fossil Future, then actually read it and made accurate comments! 🤯

Given my recent experience, Brian's crazy course of action makes him unemployable as a journalist at a leading publication.

Read the whole 🧵 and share your thoughts!
As far as I can tell the job description of many journalists is: identify a successful political opponent, dredge up the most controversial material you can, misrepresent that material to discredit the opponent, and gaslight them if they defend themselves.
Journalism in general and the Washington Post in particular require *systemic* change.

In Fossil Future, Chapters 1-2, I explain how our "knowledge system" completely fails at its job of accurately synthesizing and disseminating expert research.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 7
Already??

*Another* anti-fossil fuel group is planning a hit-piece on me. This time it’s @DeSmog, a well/funded anti-industry website devoted to ad hominem attacks.

Here's how I responded to their request for comment.

These guys are *really* afraid of Fossil Future. ImageImage
Anti-fossil fuel "jactivists"--journalist-activists--need to read this Public Service Announcement and start engaging with my arguments.
Answers to popular questions about me, including funding.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(