Here's the post @ClimateOfGavin called "flat out 💩 from Epstein."
It's a quote from 1986--keep track of the year, as Gavin will soon confuse it with 1988--where the NYT reports on claims made by James Hansen. I shared a chart of those claims vs. reality.
My point in this post, and in my #Catastrophizing series more broadly, is that the institutions and people we trust to give us expert knowledge give us wild overestimates of the negatives of fossil fuels.
One key #Catastrophizing practice is to misrepresent the state of science--e.g., taking a scientist with the most extreme negative view and portraying them as mainstream. Or: misrepresenting a scientist.
If NYT misrepresented Hansen in 1986, it's just further proof of my point.
Instead of trying to understand my point about the NYT's #Catastrophizing in *1986*, @ClimateOfGavin uses the 💩 emoji and goes on a rant about Hansen's work in *1988*! This is the level of rigor I've come to expect from Gavin over the years.
👇
I reached out repeatedly to @ClimateOfGavin to oppose despicable propaganda by the entity he runs: @NASAClimate. Maybe he should focus on fixing that instead of making sloppy attacks against me.
To learn more about the error of #Catastrophizing, and how it leads the public to be fundamentally misinformed about the state of science, check out Fossil Future.
Here's an excerpt from Chapter 2, which is called "Catastrophizing Side-Effects."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dems are trying everything imaginable to lower oil/gasoline prices except *the thing that would actually work*: STOP THREATENING THE EXISTENCE OF THE OIL INDUSTRY.
Instead of acknowledging their key role in increasing oil prices, Dems are engaging in epic denial tactics.
🧵👇
For 15+ years Democratic politicians, including Joe Biden, have relentlessly attacked oil investment, oil production, and oil transport—leading to higher prices and lower security.
Instead of taking credit for their "success," they are denying that they are anti-fossil fuels!
The "business decisions" denial tactic
For 15+ years Democratic politicians have pushed everything they can to threaten new oil production: net-zero, ESG, proposed bans, etc.
Now they are blaming companies for "business decisions" to refrain from threatened oil production!
The climate catastrophist establishment fears me and Fossil Future so much that they *fund Google ads to smear me*.
PS While this group publicly smears me as a "climate science denier" to Google searchers, their long article offers no evidence for this claim. (None exists.)
Here's why the climate catastrophist establishment is afraid of me.
My successful preemption of The Washington Post's planned "racism" hit-piece is now a national news story. Thanks to @FoxNews's @briansflood for the accurate reporting.
As far as I can tell the job description of many journalists is: identify a successful political opponent, dredge up the most controversial material you can, misrepresent that material to discredit the opponent, and gaslight them if they defend themselves.
Journalism in general and the Washington Post in particular require *systemic* change.
In Fossil Future, Chapters 1-2, I explain how our "knowledge system" completely fails at its job of accurately synthesizing and disseminating expert research.
*Another* anti-fossil fuel group is planning a hit-piece on me. This time it’s @DeSmog, a well/funded anti-industry website devoted to ad hominem attacks.
Here's how I responded to their request for comment.
These guys are *really* afraid of Fossil Future.
Anti-fossil fuel "jactivists"--journalist-activists--need to read this Public Service Announcement and start engaging with my arguments.