Name one area of paediatric medicine where the age and developmental stage of the child is deemed irrelevant in the diagnosis and treatment of the child?
There is only one area. The treatment of gender dysphoria in children.
Why? Well read on.
1/A thread about how trans/genderism/ideology is an attack on childhood itself.
A key strategy has been the removal of protections & the promotion of an ideological construct, the "transchild" to promote the idea that this ideology is a universal truth and not just a fetish.
2/ Some context. Academics and paediatricians have spent decades studying childhood. On the back of their empirical research, theories around childhood development have been formulated and critiqued. In this article you will find some of this work ebswa.org/_files/ugd/2a3…
3/ To be completely clear there is no part of mainstream child development theory that supports the concept of a child having a fixed gender.
A child's sense of their own gender constantly changes throughout childhood as their brain & social relationships develop.
4/ Read Piaget, Erikson, Bandura, Kohlberg or other mainstream child development theorist and you will find evidence for this, based on empirical research.
A child's sense of their own sex & gender constantly changes. This fluidity is but one difference between a child/adult.
5/ Treating a gender dysphoric child in an evidence based manner means centering the developmental stage of the child. Otherwise the treatment is not age appropriate.
Gender affirmative treatment ALONE sets aside this age sensitive approach in favour of one driven by ideology.
6/ In this ideological approach the child's sense of their own gender is deemed inherent and immutable.
But there is no scientific evidence for this gendered soul. It is an imaginative device to create an easily malleable social construct - the "transchild."
7/ That the medical establishment, particularly in the USA, has largely fallen in with this ideological approach is a disgrace, but not surprising, when considering past medical scandals. Here is a lobotomy being performed which was once the height of medical fashion.
8/ The medical establishment including the pharmaceutical industry is thus complicit in degrading protections around children to promote this ideology. This practice being driven by WPATH and their standards of care. wpath.org/publications/s…
9/ So the transgender movement has succeeded beyond its wildest dreams in grooming vulnerable children into believing that they have an immutable gender that is more real than their natal sex. Medical science has fallen in with this fad along with agencies to protect children.
10/ Fortunately there is a simple way out of this mess. For us all to demand that gender dysphoria in children is treated in an evidence based manner. #Cassreview is hopefully a turning point in the UK regards this. cass.independent-review.uk
11/ Importantly, the social construct known as the "transchild" must be called out every time it is uttered. The term is synonymous with the removal of safeguarding and the abuse of children. Those that use this word must be made aware that they are promoting child abuse.
12/ In short childhood needs to be returned to children, away from adults who use it to promote ideology. Gender needs to revert to being a small and boring part of childhood.
Let children play and experiment (with their sense of gender if they wish) in peace!
End.
OK this thread has taken off.🤗
I will respond to questions in due course. Please do ask and or challenge🙂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread about children's bodily autonomy and gender ideology.
If you frame gender affirmative treatment in relation to the concept of a child's bodily autonomy it is clear that this practice is about a child relinquishing control of their body to adults and medicine. /1
Take an 11yr old pre pubescent child. All child development science suggests that their understanding of their own gender is childlike and constantly changing. This is how it should be. An external social construct such as gender is something to push against/test themselves. /2
Gender contructs provide something solid for that child to work out who they are. They may hate these constructs but these constructs allow them to work though who they are and their values.
Queer feminism. Feminism that advocates removing existing protections for women in favour of male desires
Queer safeguarding. Safeguarding that advocates removing existing protections for children in favour of male desires.
🧐🤔 So who are the main beneficiaries of "queering"?
Queer gay rights. Publicly funded hierarchical movement that advocates removing existing protections for gay people in favour of heterosexuals.
Queer medical care. Medical care that advocates children becoming ill through making interventions that will ensure lifelong ill health.
Queer medicine. Medicine based on feelings not evidence or science.
A cursory glance at any mainstream child development/educational theory will show that for a child to develop into a well rounded adult, they need, amongst other things, firm, well defined boundaries to test themselves/push off against.
Uncontroversial eh?
However the aim of Queer theory (QT) is to subvert/queer those boundaries. To dissolve boundaries around normalcy and challenge mainstream thinking.
Fine and dandy for sherry drinking university students and the academics who want to trangress boundaries. But not children.
Without clear, firm boundaries a child's development is harmed. Independent thought/actions becomes dependent on the adults around, affirming the child.
In other words the child's sense of their own self does not grow independently of the adult. It becomes dependent on adults.
A short thread about a recent trend that has emerged in the white middle classes - Oppression tourism.
No longer content to drift off to far flung areas of the world, with their rapacious appetites and sense of entitlement, they have settled on a destination closer to home.
Like all tourism with power inequity at its heart, oppression tourism is a deeply harmful practice.
Not for the tourists who can opt out when it becomes uncomfortable & return home. But for members of groups who have sustained generations of systemic and brutal oppression.
They cannot opt out and leave. They now have to compete for scarce resources with these newcomers who are colonising their spaces. Colonisers who have all the advantages that come from being part of the oppressive majority.
Social class, like gender, is a societal construct, designed to benefit those with power and to oppress those with less power.
Your gender is no more inherent within you than your social class. Both constructs are imposed on you
To pretend somehow that a patriarchal control mechanism like gender is inherent within you, that you are in control of it, and that you can identify out of it, is delusional.
No wonder power structures in society are happy to encourage gender identity theory.
And that is why Queer theory is such a losers game. It encourages individuals to opt out of the class/gender struggle and accept the status quo with a few tiny modifications. Ie rainbows and pronouns.
Queering is about selfish gains and not about class or gender emancipation.