This is the Russian Flagship #Moskva before she sank. It's impossible to fully assess the situation aboard based on one picture but marine salvage masters must make assumptions based on little information. As a ship captain and ship fire author here's what appears to be likely🧵
The first question any salvage expert will ask is how close is she to sinking. The red line on this photo shows the approximate location of the new waterline. As you can see by comparing the photos she has lost a significant amount of buoyancy and is listing to port.
She, however, is probably not in immediate danger of sinking for a few reasons: 1) She has some reserve buoyancy left because she has not reached deck edge immersion, which is the point where no freeboard is left and stability goes from bad to worse.
2) The spraying water means they have at least emergency power which could be - if the crew had enough time - set up to help dewater the ship. 3) The weather is relatively calm. If the waves picked up the danger of sinking would increase exponentially.
What else do we know?
The Lifeboats have been deployed and nobody is on deck, even back aft where it's smoke-free. Hoses are rigged to spray in the air. Those could have been rigged to help cool the ship but more likely are there to let nearby ships know when she lost power.
So it's likely been fully abandoned. It's possible that some people remain down below but staying in the engine room without proper boundary cooling and topside assistance from trained shipboard firefighters would be suicidal.
What else do we know?
The Smoke is dark and heavy. This is a serious fire with a lot of heat. Dark smoke is a result of the burning of heavy fuels or synthetic materials and incomplete combustion. It's a very hazardous situation.
We know the picture was taken relatively soon after the fire grew this large. We can assume this with some confidence because most of the grat paint is intact. Another hour under those conditions and the paint will likely peel and get covered in soot.
We know don't see any nearby ships. Professional salvage teams require a lot of heavy equipment and firefighting gear. They would likely get a tugboat to spray the forward end with fire monitors to cool the ship before boarding with fireteams. No nearby ships are cooling her.
The next question is why? There is a rescue ship nearby (that ship took this photo) Is she not equipped with fire monitors capable of shooting water outward? Or is she keeping a safe distance because there is a real danger of a secondary explosion from munitions stored aboard?
Next, we have to ask what's unusual about this photo? To me, the most striking part is the smoke is being blown forward and she has reserved buoyancy. This is a dangerous situation but the aft helideck is free of smoke and should be cool enough to work.
If this was a commercial ship the captain would likely have abandoned "non-essential" personnel and regrouped his fire teams at a "safe staging area" (likely the helideck) but this is a warship so the salvage team would have to know the location of all explosives before boarding
Finally, us captains don't care about equipment, we live and die by one rule during emergencies at sea. In an explosion of this magnitude, our job is not to save everyone but to save the highest percentage of people possible. This could lead to hard decisions.
As a commercial ship captain, the likely correct answer here is to abandon the ship knowing she would likely sink, and let insurance cover the loss.. but a Navy captain does not have that luxury.
The biggest difference between a commercial ship captain and a navy captain is that we civilians only have to worry about our own crew. Navy guys don't have that luxury. They must think about their crew and the strategic mission.
Remember the golden rule - "save as many people as possible" - well, the people a navy captain has to think about are not just the crewmembers but also the army and marines his ship provides air cover and artillery support for.
By abandoning his ship early he may save his crew but lose the war.
By most accounts, this flagship ship was critical to these war efforts. My best assumption - again based on too little evidence - is because of 1) the importance of this ship to the war effort 2) because the Montreux convention prevents Russia from sending a replacement
3) the calm weather, reserve buoyancy, and the fact she still had power means she could possibly have been saved 4) the fact the helideck was smoke-free
For these reasons my best guess is the captain of the Moskva abandoned his ship too early.
P.S. If you've read this far and want to learn more about evacuating a ship under hotter and more explosive conditions please consider reading my book amzn.to/38XY7kF
Update: looks like a salvage tug WAS alongside at the time of this photo. Good catch @MisrememberedY
UPDATE 2: A few have pointed out there is a boat, probably a salvage tug, close alongside starboard aft.
In that case, the water stream pointing aft is likely coming from the tug & means there isn’t much heat stbd aft. Salvage tug monitors (like garden hoses) have straight spray and fan spray… you would use fan spray as a shield if heat and smoke were a problem. Example:
Many older fire monitors require special pumps that can’t be turned off and on with a switch… so they are probably just spraying it aft to keep it out of the way but available if the smoke and heat shifts.
There is a *small* chance they hooked the tug pump into the ships’ main to provide water pressure to the pipe on the port side… so it’s possible the ship did lose emergency power.
It is also possible the tug is made fast and is pulling the ship astern. That might explain why the smoke is streaming fwd and away from the heli-deck. Hard to tell for certain.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I disagree completely — and that’s strange, because I think the reason Thomas Massie is getting flak is the same reason Mamdani won.
I’m a New Yorker. I’ve seen every layer of this city — the grit of the Bronx and the glass towers of Midtown, the preachers and the traders, the liberals and the cops. My wife and I logged more than ten years in New York’s colleges; I even attended the same ultra-progressive gifted high school as Lina Khan. At one point, debates couldn’t even happen unless I showed up — because without me, there was no one to take the conservative side.
I’ve lived among the poorest in the Bronx, where my mother worked as a nurse in the projects — and I’ve sailed with Manhattan’s elite.
My grandfather was a Methodist minister. My father, a devout Catholic. My godfather is Jewish. I worked for an all-Hindu company in India and an all-Muslim one in Boston. I’ve read every sacred text — not because I wanted to prove any of them right, but because I wanted to understand why so many people are willing to die for an idea.
And I learned early what ideas can cost.
My father died from Agent Orange when I was a kid — a casualty of both Communism and our own government’s incompetence. Since then, I’ve spent a lifetime studying how nations rise and rot. I’ve worked with people from every end of the spectrum — from one of the most liberal senators in America, Mark Kelly, to the Heritage 2025 team — all trying to rebuild the same sinking ship.
So enough about me. Let’s get to the heart of it. 1/4
The Real Divide Isn’t Left vs. Right — It’s Chaos vs. Order
Trump won in 2016 — and again in 2024 — for the same reason he lost in 2020.
It’s the same reason de Blasio failed where Bloomberg thrived.
The same reason Rudy Giuliani could command a city, and Mamdani could win one.
This isn’t about Epstein, or Israel, or inflation. It’s about order and following a systemic plan.
Giuliani tore corruption out of New York. Bloomberg tore sloth out of its bureaucracy.
Trump in 2016 promised to bring in the “best and brightest” to drain the swamp — but by 2020 those “best and brightest” had revealed themselves as the swamp itself.
Chaos killed him. He was fighting an internal battle and didn’t have a plan for the next four years.
Americans want a plan, preferably an extreme plan because we all know centrist plans won’t work today
Trump came back in 2024 not with slogans, but with Project 2025 (and several other great plans) — a blueprint to re-engineer the American machine. Ruthlessly. Without taking prisoners.
De Blasio and Biden failed not because of ideology — but because of entropy. No plan. No structure. Just drift.
Mamdani won because he has a plan — to dismantle capitalism and replace it with Communism.
And he’s backed by sharp minds like Lina Khan, who see not markets or morals, but systems. Systems to be broken and rebuilt. 2/4
⸻
The Dangerous Beauty of the Blueprint
I loathe Communism. I’ve read Marx, Lenin, Mao. I know the language, the promises, the poison. It is evil.
But it is also efficient — frighteningly efficient — at one thing: systematically destroying existing orders.
That’s the common ground between MAGA and Mamdani.
Both movements are fueled by disgust — with corruption, with waste, with the permanent class of parasites who run Washington and Wall Street alike.
Both sides want to burn the rot out of the system.
And here’s the uncomfortable truth: many on the Left quietly admired Trump’s first promise to “drain the swamp.” And many on the Right today secretly respect Mamdani’s willingness to wield a scalpel — or a hammer — where others use talking points.
Because deep down, we all know it: the system is broken.
And broken systems don’t reform — they collapse or get rebuilt.
MAGA offers a drastic rebuilding. Communism offers a total barn fire we can rebuild from. 3/4
Yesterday, for the first time, I turned my back on a liberal neighbor and walked away. For Charlie.
I get asked daily by conservatives how I can possibly live in the most liberal town of the most liberal state.
Truth is, I’ve always been fascinated by how they think. I usually just laugh at the irrational takes.
But a single gunshot drained all curiosity and humor out of me.
He simply asked how I was. I said I was sad. He asked why.
“It’s 9/11. My dad was FDNY. And yesterday I lost a friend.”
His face softened. “I’m so sorry.”
I didn’t want to cry, so I backpedaled. “It’s ok, we weren’t close. Just spoke a few times but he felt like a good friend.”
“Who was it?” he asked.
“Charlie Kirk.”
Empathy turned to anger. Like I’d tricked him.
“Well, I don’t know him, and I don’t care what happens to him.”
“But he was my friend. I’m your friend. Isn’t that enough to care?”
He pivoted to politics. Gun violence. Assault weapon bans. “You people.”
I said it was a bolt-action rifle. He didn’t care. He said he didn’t care about Charlie.
Even though Charlie was a father? A friend? A believer?
“No,” he said. But his body language betrayed him. He did care.
Then: “I don’t want to talk politics.”
“I’m not,” I said. “I lost a friend. A friend with a wife and two beautiful daughters.”
Again: “I don’t care.”
So I turned and walked away.
He could have changed the subject, asked me about my Dad and 9/11 instead. But he was fixated on political drama not true empathy.
Some Republicans will say I should’ve stood my ground, yelled, fought back, told him off.
Some Democrat friends will say I should’ve leaned in harder with empathy and spent time getting him to understand my point of view.
But here’s the truth: I’m done.
Done debating. Done convincing. Done trying to “win” them over.
Charlie lived that. He spoke truth with compassion, even behind “enemy lines.” He never saw Democrats as the enemy. He saw Americans missing key pieces of the truth. He gave empathy and respect coupled with hard truths until his last dying breath.
He was a better man than me. Better than most of us.
And now he’s gone.
I’m not a great men Charlie, I’m a Captain in the U.S. Merchant Marine. We don’t talk, or seek glory & fame, don’t ask for thanks or forgiveness. We just move cargo. LOTS of cargo.
Our motto is simple: Acta Non Verba.
Actions, not words.
So why don’t I fight harder in my own neighborhood? Why do I let it go when a neighbors took down my flag on “no kings day”? Why do I remove the Trump magnet on my tesla when I get home.
Because the consequences are real. They don’t just punish me my kids will suffer for the sins of the father. But as the man said, he doesn’t care. That’s the line I won’t let them cross.
And because I do not have the courage of Charlie.
But gratitude for Charlie demands something more. Something bigger than my town which isn’t going to change. Debate is over. Tears are over. The time for action is here.
Not violence. Not riots. Not theatrics.
Political action.
Votes. Campaign cash. Pink slips across DC. Crowds of conservatives in every GOP office in congress demanding they stop doing TV appearances and start playing hardball.
Laws flipped at local, state & federal levels.
A dozen Scott Preslers in every California & Vermont farm town & every NYC church, rising Christians to vote out Sanders, Newsom, AOC & Mamdani.
An army of white hats exposing criminal NGOs, with Mike Benz, Data Republican, and a phalanx of lawyers volunteering for Will Chamberlain to get convictions.
Mass action against every Marxist policy.
We will not out-scream them. We will out-organize them. You can literally debate them until your last dying breath and nothing will change.
They don’t care and there is no way to change the mind of an apathetic man.
The time for debate is over.
We must speak softly and start carrying a big stick.
Acta non verba.
For Charlie.
tldr
They have the best theater kids. They have top Ivy league debaters. They have most MSM pundits.
What do we have in abundance?
Protestant Work Ethic
We can’t replace Charlie. But you can couple your individual talent with the work ethic of Charlie Kirk.
How can you start living Acta Non Verba?
1) Close X
2) List your best talents & skills
3) Match those with people (like @AndrewKsway & @ScottPresler) doing real boots on the ground (or really cyberwork like @DataRepublican) work
The danger isn’t new. As early as September 1753, near the end of a 2-month voyage to Virginia, Captain Thomas Francis warned of smoke in the hold of the Pearl, identifying sulfur-rich coal as the culprit. It was a harbinger of disaster to come.
By the 1860s, the scope had escalated: British and Australian Royal Commissions and reports, including one from the Salvage Association of Lloyd’s, flagged spontaneous combustion and poor ventilation as major causes of coal-cargo calamities and one of the biggest risks to ships at sea.
The Trump Administration just issued a potential death blow to the UN’s most ambitious and consequential Green initiative proposed by their powerful maritime arm @IMOHQ in London
This is a marked shift. Normally the United States ignores this body and sends a small delegation of USCG SES and relatively Jr state department diplomats over just for committee meetings.
While other nations have full time Maritime Ambassadors snd teams of delegates permanently stationed in London.
Prior the last voting session State, DHS and @JerryHendrixII’s maritime team at NSC issued a letter warning the IMO to back off extreme measures.
Measures so extreme that one proposal suggested any ship that makes “ocean sounds” be banned from entering port.
Several sources told @gCaptain that a DHS team under @Sec_Noem called for the resignation of the chief U.S. delegate to the IMO before the vote. Many were shocked when she still appeared at the IMO Maritime Safety Committee meeting after agreeing to resign.
Medina, born in Panama, became a U.S. citizen after marrying a U.S. Coast Guard officer she later divorced.
Rumors swirled after Panama secured the powerful Secretary-General post with China’s backing—and without Medina’s objections.
It was the first time in IMO history that a flag of convenience with a record of registering shadow-fleet ships captured the top spot.
In 1973, this French Navy warship steamed into NYC, guns out, to haul away tons of America’s gold.
In her wake, the global economy was changed forever. 🧵
The French frigate De Grasse quietly docked, crew crisp in dress uniforms. Below decks?
Empty space soon to be packed with crates worth hundreds of millions.
This wasn’t a heist. It was the legal, deliberate execution of a plan Charles de Gaulle set in motion years earlier: trade in France’s reserve of U.S. dollars for physical gold.