Gov. Stitt on Monday began ramrodding through the Legislature at least $700 million in incentives for an unnamed company with virtually no time for lawmakers – and the general public – to evaluate how these taxpayer dollars are being spent and who benefits from them. #okleg 1/
It’s also not certain how the state intends to pay for this $700M incentive. The gov. said the state would dip into its more than $1B savings account. Legislative leadership previously said that they needed to save $2.3B to meet a recent stress test.
oksenate.gov/press-releases…
If legislative leadership intends to appropriate savings to incentives for the undisclosed company, this would represent a remarkable reversal on stated policy and without opportunity for most lawmakers, let alone everyday Oklahomans, to make an informed decision.
Gov. Stitt announced in broad terms a major incentive package at 1 p.m. The language for that bill (HB 4455) was not made public until 2:30 p.m., and it went before lawmakers for a vote just two hours later. oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?…
Officials on Monday said negotiations for this undisclosed project have been in the works for years, yet lawmakers had less than 2 hours to consider a complex, multiyear business incentive that equates to about 8% of Oklahoma’s annual budget.
It’s unreasonable to give lawmakers such a short amount of time to understand and cast an informed vote on complex, consequential legislation. It also denies the opportunity for concerned Oklahomans to weigh in.
“How am I supposed to go back to my constituents and say, ‘I gave away three-quarters of a billion dollars to a company that I don’t even know their name?’ Is that responsible?” - Rep. Collin Walke, D-OKC, during Monday’s JCAB meeting. nondoc.com/2022/04/18/okl…
Gov. Stitt called the bill “mega-legislation” for a “humongous, humongous factory,” “billions and billions of dollars worth of investment [and] thousands and thousands of jobs.” Decisions of that magnitude deserve deliberation and debate, not a secretive, last-minute rush.
We support economic development efforts that can be fully considered by elected officials to ensure best use of limited state revenue dollars. But we must object to Oklahoma taxpayers being strong-armed with a last-minute, backdoor deal that benefits a clandestine company.
None of these concerns address the merits of the proposed legislation. Frankly that’s because only a handful of insiders have considered and shaped this legislation that’s being pushed through the legislative process.
This lack of openness isn’t necessarily new: Oklahoma legislators have a history of making consequential decisions about our tax dollars outside the public eye:
okpolicy.org/oklahoma-among…
The best decisions — especially regarding expenditure of public tax dollars — are made in the light of day with the full facts available for review and consideration.
The process Oklahoma lawmakers and private interests have taken today to surreptitiously maneuver public funds for private use is antithetical to representative government.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Oklahoma Policy Institute

Oklahoma Policy Institute Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @OKPolicy

Apr 7, 2020
Hey, @ok_hca, we spotted a few red flags from today's scheduled hearing. This is going to get a bit wonky, but we think it's important for these questions to get answered in a public forum. #okleg 1/
1. Was this a public hearing on SoonerCare 2.0? Today's hearing was listed on your site as a "virtual meeting," but clicking through showed the agenda was for "virtual public hearing." It's unclear whether this was another HAO public meeting or...something else. Can you clarify?
2. Were there technical difficulties to explain the meeting's sudden end after 10 minutes with no opportunity for public comment? The agenda listed a Q&A and public comment opportunity along with a formal adjournment, none of which appears to have happened.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 24, 2019
Executive Director @dblattok is now presenting on the state budget. He’ll give us a look at where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re going. #okbudget19
"The general welfare depends on economic opportunity, financial security, good health, sustainable natural resources, safe communities, and strong families. And for all of these elements of the general welfare, an adequately funded government is indispensable."
DB: However you measure it, Oklahomans overall pay among the lowest taxes in the nation. One quarter less per capita than the national average, and about $1.70 less of every $100 in state personal income than the average American.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(