One of the most helpful things my mother (an LPC) ever taught me about abuse dynamics was this: The greater the disparity between public persona and private reality, the greater the dysfunction.
Here's why this understanding is so important...
We all understand that the version of ourselves people see in public is not exactly the same as the version someone might see if they observed us at home. We lose our tempers. We snap back. We fail to keep our responsibilities. And not everyone sees all of our worst qualities...
This is normal. In fact, we assume that people and relationships have more flaws and failures than we can observe in acquaintance or even friendship.
But in a healthy person, marriage, or home, there is limited disparity between perception and reality.
Imagine that ...
10 is the best marriage ever, and 1 is the most horrible, abusive marriage ever. Even when we observe a marriage that appears to be a 10, we assume they have their 7 or 8 moments.
Likewise, we assume that if there really were marriages that were a 1 or a 2, ...
they would appear in public as no more than a 4 or 5. We assume that there's a standard variance to the difference between public personal and private reality.
The truth is that the greater the dysfunction (abuse) the *greater* the disparity between public and private...
Abusers strive to groom and test those in their circles and communities, carefully cultivating a very positive image. In the meantime, this positive image gives them cover (and lack of accountability) to sink into deeper and deeper abuse behind closed doors. ...
When a victim who appears to be in a 10 marriage shares that her marriage is a 3, we balk. We can't fathom a person or relationship that is so vastly different in appearance and reality. Because this is outside of our experience of private/public variance, we discount her report.
That's why this truth is so important for churches and church leaders to grasp:
The greater the disparity between public persona and private reality, the *greater* the dysfunction.
My oldest three attend a ballroom dancing group they love. The leadership is very explicit about appropriate attire. Of course the rules for girls are much more lengthy and detailed than for boys. OK, we knew this going in and we had talks about the difference between ...
Following the rules set by a certain group for *their* events vs an overall understanding of what true modesty looks like (not particularly focused on shoulders and skirt length). Last week, my daughter was called aside and given a talk about the inappropriateness of her ...
Nail polish. She's taken up the hobby of nail art and loves exploring new techniques. She's quite good. This particular design was an array of geometric designs in black, white, and red. So, obviously sinful. Even though there aren't any rules about nail polish and no more ...
Recently I heard a conservative theologian accuse those who disagree with Complementarianism of "elevating experience over reason and the Bible. On the surface, that sounds like a valid complaint. It is possible to promote personal experience over objective truth unreasonably.
But please be aware that this isn't a one-sided danger. There is actually a corresponding ditch we could fall into, and that is the mistake of disregarding experience or treating it as irrelevant.
Reading through the book of Matthew and I've been struck by how much time Jesus spends warning about "wolves" and "false teachers" and "broods of vipers" and "hypocrites". Again and again, he says that we can recognize false teachers and their false doctrines BY THEIR FRUIT.