It's funny how every time a section of the populace is allowed to speak even somewhat freely, it immediately begins to question core tenets of "Democracy"
This outcome is then declared undemocratic, and can only be solved by bringing it back under the control of a central regime
When people, the demos, begin to decide they don't like what Democracy is doing, "We"—who, exactly?—
Must step in, in the name of Democracy, a government "of" the people, to correct the desires of those same people, that conflict with the desires of "Us"
When people are left to themselves, they somehow just always revert to believing disinformation that is at total odds with Our democratic truths and values. When they reject Our Values, this is a red-hot sign that Our Democracy is in decline.
When the people stray from the Values of Our Democracy, it is Our solemn duty to the people straying from Democracy to remold the people's informational environment so that they are only capable of expressing Our Values, for their own good
This is the definition of Our Democracy
How do We secure "their greatest gift," that they, when they start to discuss what they actually want, are always trying to squander?
Through Democracy's exertion of corporate + government power, the most Democracy means of all, to restrict people's ability to say what they want
The internet was unowned space, as BAP puts it, + as soon as it opened its widest frontier, the people used it to decide on a political outcome that the We's and Our's loathed
The We's and Our's immediately mounted a massive pressure campaign to reclaim that space for themselves
It worked. From 2016-20, media onslaught + internal capture forced every social media platform to tighten its speech to conform to the desired outcomes of the We's and Our's.
Until it is now safe for Barack Obama to call for it being tightened even further. "For the people"
Thus why when someone who doesn't appear to be on the side of the We's and Our's threatens to buy out a piece of their newly-captured territory... hysteria, meltdown, rewrite the rules again
For Our Democracy
"By and of the people" is now in permanent warfare with "for the people." The people have become a completely different people from those who decide "for the people."
In warfare, freedoms vanish in a snap. They won't let up. Until we win, we must understand that it is war.
The trans movement is one of the only current hills that progressivism can actually lose on right now. This has been obvious for a while
Meanwhile they are grooming, both figuratively and literally. This is actually the sane position
This is the one. It's a winner.
Modern "democracy" relies on a form of grooming of you, through the Cathedral, the Regime, mass media, whatever you want to call it.
Whenever you start to oppose this upper-level grooming, because it's unnatural, "democracy" labels this as a fascism
We can tell that this isn't "democracy" because actual humans consider their children their own, while "democracy" considers children property of the "democratic" state.
This is borne out, by the simple fact, that "democracy" is now obsessed with grooming children.
"Sanctions" feels like an increasingly fake policy to me. Something that only has an impact on nations that don't actually provide something capital really wants.
Maybe this worked for a brief period decades ago, but it just feels irrelevant at this point. Just policy theater
An obvious explanation for why liberalism loathes methods like war is that its own methods are proven totally non-functional whenever there's anything real at stake
If "sanctions" are mere policy theater, like everything involving the coronavirus was proven to be, and ever will be
Then anything that proves sanctioned nations are resistant to liberal democracy's impotent modes of attack will only drive liberal democracy to insane rage
This is what bothers me most, the complete disinterest, if not outright hostility, in understanding *why* this is happening
Instead, you get immediate + total consensus. This level of oversocialization makes it v. easy to get why everyone is so eager to believe Marvel fairytales
Even if Russia is ultimately in the wrong, there are very real national interests at stake for them. The very fact they decided to do something as extreme as invade their neighboring state should point to that
Instead, it's immediately painted as cartoon-tier villainy
This precludes the possibility of any truthful understanding of why Russia *might* be wrong
Or, setting right and wrong aside entirely, and focusing entirely on political reality, how to avoid further calamities like this in the future
The hilarious tension here is that Breaking Bad was one of the great shows of the last few decades but literally no one would watch a show about Bryan Cranston, the man who worries about his white privilege
Breaking Bad was about a character who pushed the absolute edges of morality in such a way that you could somehow sympathize with the protagonist/anti-hero right up until the very end
Meanwhile its main actor is like "Oh no I'm white"
But they're not "volatile and dangerous," they're setting up bouncy castles and honking horns
This is exactly why your "liberal democracy" is powerless, what are you gonna do, haul your nation's workers off to jail because they don't want to be forced to take medical treatments?
The truckers are like Canada's Trump moment, maybe even more clarified, because all they want is to not have things forcibly injected into their bodies
And when they protest for this basic freedom—protest, the hallmark of democracy!—you then crash the full state down on them
The crisis of the truckers is that it exposes the lie: the people aren't free, and if they start to act like they deserve to be, while following your own rules, you will resort to employing the Extra-Democratic Rules you've built to ensure they must follow the Policy
Whether it's Trump on immigration or Rufo on CRT, it's crazy how effective the right becomes the second it stops relying on blabber about how "But the left doesn't even believe their own principles" and begins taking real action to protect their own voters
Rhetoric followed by inaction is self-demoralizing. Rhetoric followed by action creates true morale, which swells your momentum as much or more than whatever words you used to begin the counter-action
People begin to believe in you when you start to sacrifice yourself for them.
Words don't cost much, unless they're outrageous. Political action that risks your destruction is what earns you fanatics, and that's when you get your (political) army