Non-medical drug switching--born not of clinical reasons but out of the revenue-maximizing contract negotiations between pharma & PBMs--has tangible human impact. I am one of those impacted. #CardioTwitter #StopTheSwitch #MedTwitter #TwitterRx onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
2) Shared decision making necessitates that no one stand between a patient & clinician making decisions based upon the clinical evidence.
yet
Non-medical drug switching= the insurance PBM knows better than patient & doctor.
#MedTwitter #CardioTwitter #TwitterRx #StopTheSwitch
3) If clinical evidence cannot be acted upon at the point of care at the dictates of a profit-motivated third party, can clinicians really be said to be practicing evidenced-based medicine?
🚨Clinical decisions MUST be between a patient & physician only.#MedTwitter #CardioTwitter
4) Anticoagulants are the #1 class of drugs for adverse events. They require careful clinical management. I trust my doctor of 18 years to manage my anticoagulant therapy, not my insurance PBM, who is motivated by nontransparent profit motives. #CardioTwitter #MedTwitter
5) Federal prohibition of non-medical switching is needed. Allowing a corporation to override a physician's order, switching stable heart patients off a drug they've taken for YEARS? The lack of protections to prevent patient harm is astonishing. @SenFinance @FTC @WaysMeansCmte

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Beth Joyner Waldron

Beth Joyner Waldron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BethWaldron

Apr 21
Why prior authorization is NOT the answer to helping patients stay on their long-time effective medications due to PBM formulary coverage drops & non-medical switching:
2) Prior authorization (under my insurance plan) increases the patient's costs, moving the drug from co-pay status to one of co-insurance & deductible. Example: When Caremark dropped Eliquis as a Tier 2 covered drug & I got a PA, it increased my cost by $2,400 annually.
3) Applying for a prior authorization does NOT guarantee approval. Only ~60% of Eliquis PAs for switched patients in surveyed clinics were approved by Caremark. I've talked to patients who had been stable on Eliquis for YEARS who had second level appeals DENIED by Caremark.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 19
I've been asked 'why am I such a vocal patient advocate?' None of us escapes sickness. Many of us will face a serious illness. I've walked in those shoes as both patient & caregiver. Years ago I worked in health admin, but I choose to VOLUNTEER now because helping feels good.
2) I think of my Dad. I watched him bleed to death on anticoagulation. I want my doctor who knows me to be the one to make the evidenced based care decisions about my own anticoagulation & not my insurer. Would Dad have understood a non-medical drug switch letter from a PBM? No.
3) So when I hear of patients having clinically significant bleeds & thromboembolic stroke events due to the non-medical switching of anticoagulants, how can I possibly be silent? No one is paying me to advocate. It's simply the right thing to do to help patients.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 18
I filed a formal complaint w/ @HHSOCR @lisajpino re CVS Caremark Office of President @KarenSLynch use of my medical info to silence my tweets sounding 🚨 on adverse stroke & bleeds in multiple states as a result of their non-medical switching of anticoagulants in at-risk pts. 🧵
2) Caremark (who covers 1 in 3 Americans) admitted it is standard corporate practice to ACCESS AN INSURED PATIENT's PRESCRIPTION RECORD & cold contact the patient based BASED SOLEY ON A SOCIAL MEDIA POST about the company or tagging of an exec--a clear HIPAA violation.
3) I have a life-threatening condition & depend on medications PBM Caremark controls my access to. When a man "working on behalf of the Office of The President" in the same call references both a specific drug prior authorization I have & my advocacy Tweets, I feel threatened.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 12
A man "working on behalf of the Office of The President" @CVSHealth called me outta the blue 2x last week wanting me to explain my TWEETS.

Listen as I'm told execs & @KarenSLynch herself review recordings & the 'case' they compile on me & other PBM Caremark insured patients.🧵
2) I do hope @KarenSLynch gets involved to get Eliquis back on Caremark national base formulary. As @FortuneMagazine 'Most Powerful Woman in Health Care' I haven't understood why her company couldn't negotiate a favorable deal with @bmsnews so patients have covered access.
3) Eliquis & Xarelto retail for about the same price.
My local Walgreens: Eliquis $617, Xarelto $620.Data below from @P4AD_ It's always a bit odd when 1 company raises their price within days of the other to match. 🤔 @bmsnews @JanssenUS Point is, note the retail costs.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 10
Please help.

PBM CVS Caremark cold called me 2x because of my TWEETS about their Eliquis drop & resulting patient harms. A 🧵

Please RT & tag your elected leaders, media, ANYONE who can help protect patients.
#TwitterRx #MedTwitter #CardioTwitter
2) For those new to the Eliquis CVS Caremark coverage issue, take a moment to read my patient story & the issue explainer I published in @RPTHjournal : onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
3) I never gave CVS social media my phone number, subscriber number or permission to access my medical records or contact my insurance plan manager. They did ALL this before cold calling me about a TWEET I made re this @FOX13Memphisnews @FOX13Mandy story fox13memphis.com/news/local/doc…
Read 25 tweets
Jan 31
I filed a @FTC report on CVS Caremark practices forcing 150,000 heart patients off Eliquis over the pleas of 16 national nonprofits. Patients are captive PBM consumers in need of federal protection. Investigate @linakhanFTC @FTCPhillips @RKSlaughterFTC @CSWilsonFTC @FTCWATCH
@FTC @linakhanFTC @FTCPhillips @RKSlaughterFTC @CSWilsonFTC @FTCWATCH Here's what the American Society of Hematology said to CVS Caremark:
"gravely concerned"
"serious impact" on patients
"ASH urges CVS to reconsider"
They cite clinical data showing ⬆️bleed risk ⬇️ outcomes.
hematology.org/-/media/hemato…
And here's 14 additional nonprofits urging CVS to reverse course because:
"this abrupt change will be dangerously disruptive for patients"
"unquestionably exacerbate health equity concerns that exist in cardiovascular care"
static1.squarespace.com/static/56e6efd…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(