THREAD: My #GenderCritical thoughts on how to constitutionally handle gender religion, and its pronouns and whatnot, in schools:
<rant>
(1) Gender ideology IS a religion. It is a faith-based, nonscientific, gnostic-dualist belief system about the soul...
(2) ...specifically, about the corruption of the physical body vs the immutable purity of the gendered soul, with ritualistic practices (language & body modification) for attending to the needs of the gendered soul over the flaws of the sexed body.
(3) Fine. It's a free country. All religions are welcome and may freely exercise. But only up until the point that their free exercise starts to interfere with the constitutional rights of other individual citizens. Then, the state must protect others' rights as well.
(4) One particular area where free exercise may not infringe is public school. This is not a new idea, and it is not controversial. It's an established tenet of constitutional law. The constitution has an Establishment Clause. Government agencies may not promote *any* religion.
(5) Public schools can teach ABOUT religions. Equally. Among other religions. "This term we're going to learn about world religions. Here's a list of the religions and their beliefs and practices." That sort of thing.
(6) But public schools may not PROMOTE any of the religions. No, "this term we're going to say Christian prayers in class," or "this week the cafeteria will stop serving food because we're fasting for Ramadan."
(7) This is where Gender Religion and pronouns come in. Schools MAY NOT require pronouns, and must SAY NO to students and families who make gender-religious demands. The fact that it's unpopular to do what's right doesn't change what's right. Rip off the Band-Aid and say NO.
(8) That this is the only constitutionally defensible course of action is already borne out in court proceedings, with a number of settlements w/ staff wrongly fired for refusing to use bogus pronouns against their will.
(9) So, once again, if you belong to Gender Religion, that's your right. Good for you. You may practice your religion as you see fit. (Unless your religion compels you to gravely physically harm others, like your children--that's a whole 'nother rabbit hole...but I digress...)
(10) But if your fundamentalist beliefs require you to surround yourself with people who practice the same religion, then you are a separatist. Feel free to find yourself a separatist private school just like other separatist religious sects do.
(11) Alternatively, if you want to be part of the melting pot, then say your religious incantations to yourself while coexisting with others who don't say them. And keep your religious views about gendered souls to yourself unless speaking with someone who is actually interested.
(12) And then, effing be willing to tolerate others' views in return, which in all likelihood are not the same as yours, because your religion is considered by most people--justifiably, if I may say so--to be creepy.
(12) You do you. But the rest of us will exercise our free speech as we see fit, including in public school, because it's our legal right and we are living in a society.
</rant>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: By a large margin, the French National Academy of Medicine has passed a resolution urging parents to be wary of social contagion, and recommending that gender care emphasize mental over physical interventions:
Notably, the position statement emphasizes that there is no test capable of distinguishing which patients will have lasting dysphoria vs. which will simply grow out of it.
Insights from evolutionary psychology re how newborns protect themselves from maternal self-interest by gaming maternal instincts in their favor via oxytocin. Biology is SO much smarter than we think we are:
"To defend against maternal infanticide, a newborn's best strategy...
2/ "...may be to display cues that it is a vehicle worthy of investment....Newborns who nurse in the first hour of birth stimulate a surge in maternal oxytocin levels [causing the nursing mother to] become less motivated to self-groom for the purposes of attracting a mate...
3/ "...and more motivated to groom their infants....By contrast, new mothers who do not nurse are more likely to suffer from postpartum depression,...a condition associated with higher rates of maternal infanticide...
THREAD: This was my kid to a T(rex), so thought I'd pull her favorite books off our shelf and list them, for any other parents whose kids need engaging books about biology and evolution:
2/ A good way to engross a child is to let them follow the paths of the early explorers--Cuvier's catalogs of animal drawings, Darwin's journey on the Beagle. Even those who got it wrong (Waterhouse) or who are just making up pretend biologies for fun (Olander's monsters)...
3/ Here are links to some of the books my daughter came back to again and again:
Dover edition of Cuvier's animal drawings (there are other Cuvier publications, but this is the most kid friendly):
Recall that puberty-suppressing drugs were developed to help kids whose puberty comes on too soon. Their use is steeped in controversy, foremost because they damage bone development; but also...
3/...because their ensuing decrease in popularity due to these problems left the industry wondering where it could offload them next.
Which fueled the brilliant idea of suppressing puberty in perfectly healthy kids, in the name of "gender."
On the NIH's proposal to "study sex as a non-binary construct" at taxpayer expense (thread--link to submit commentary to NIH at end):
"Sex IS a binary construct for humans, and most of our species' close and distant relatives. If one produces the large gamete, one is female; ...
2/...if one produces the small gamete, one is male. There has never been a third human gamete; there is no spegg. No human has ever resulted from the union of any two gametes other than sperm and egg.
...
3/ That a putatively scientific organization should be "investigating sex as a non-binary construct" means that the organization is no longer scientific, putatively or actually.
If NIH is going to be a purveyor of the psueodscience and pseudoreligion of nonfalsifiable...
THREAD: On Dem gaslighting and #PortlandRiots. As international attention focuses on Portland, we've become an inconvenient truth--something the Dem Party has to retroactively pretend it didn't create. Speaking up about it now puts one in the crosshairs of gaslighting...
2/...techniques. Dem Party now realizes its months of giving terrorists a pass--and before that years of inciting them--has become a bad look for it. Dems rewrite history: "We never condoned violence!" When you read their posts back to them, you're told you're the one who's lying
3/..& that there's no violence to see. Often by people you know personally & have regularly seen condoning violence in private. Mostly they threaten you. But sometimes they're friendly and conciliatory. "I don't think you're being fair." Well, there's nothing more unfair than...