As we await for the great Russian breakout in the Donbas and the encirclement of the Ukrainian forces, thought I would expand on this statement as some ground force people didn’t like it.
The picture of those who see the Russians doing well is that they will soon break through Ukrainian lines in the Donbas and encircle, kettle, fix etc, all Ukrainian forces to the east. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
On the map this looks eminently possible, and I’m sure many analysts have war games with it happening. It harkens back to the large armored breakouts and encirclements of WW2. Head down from Izyum and trap the Ukrainians.
However what seems to be missing from all this talk is that the great armor break out, encirclements we’re based on air dominance as much as anything else, it was not just tanks. Starting with the German conquest of France, and really reaching its peak in the…
Soviet and US/U.K. breakthroughs in 1944, all these military events were based on having AirPower control over the battlefield, pinning defensive forces down while allowing your forces to advance while protected.
You want to see an attempt to advance without air superiority? I give you the Battle of the Bulge. German forces moved ahead only because the bad weather kept allied aircraft out of the skies for a few days in December 1944. Skies cleared, advance stopped.
So all those talking about some lighting Russian breakthrough and advance in the Donbas without air dominance being operated by the Russians over the battlefield are basically speaking of a kind of warfare that has never existed and probably never will.
Why? Because defensive firepower is now far more effective in range and destructiveness against armor columns than at any time in history. Don’t know if you saw this, but a Ukrainian Javelin unit took out a Russian tank at more than 4 km away.
Ukraine has been flooded with these hand held anti tank weapons, that will attrit Russian armored columns that are operating advancing along unsecured roads. It’s not going to be Guiderian, Patton or Zhukov.
Any Russian breakthrough without air dominance providing constant patrol protection will most likely result in halting, slow advances as the Ukrainians can still halt the vehicles at a distance.
So people discussing any Russian breakthrough and encirclement operation as occurring without Russian having active air control over the battlefield are making up a historical scenario that has never existed.
Perhaps this Russian army is so skilled, motivated and well equipped that it can make history without air supremacy. Or perhaps it’s not.
Update on the Russian blitzkrieg encirclement.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Apr 25
Interesting historical reflections on whether what we are seeing in the Donbas is more like WW1 or WW2. Might hazard a few guesses. It’s WW1 followed by WW2. Attrition and reduced mobility at first, until one side starts degrading too much and we see collapses.
We are now in a closer to WW1 stage. Little change in the front lines (which hasn’t moved much for more than a month). Seems to be regular attrition though. Where it’s not like WW1 is that the armies are much smaller. They can’t take attrition for that long.
Attrition will pick up too. Ukraine is getting more and more effective range weapons in artillery and UAVs, and Russia is rushing the defeated Kyiv forces back into battle, dispatching mercenaries, etc
Read 8 tweets
Apr 25
Either this is an accident, or the Ukrainians are again destroying valuable logistics facilities not that far the Ukrainian border.
Secondary explosion at Bryansk. One explanation I think should be considered extremely unlikely is the false flag by Russia on itself. You don’t destroy vital facilities in a false flag, you go for eye catching ephemera.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 24
Battle of the Donbas, loss rates and why Russia has to act soon or it wont be able to act at all. War after the opening phase (which we have passed) it not about doctrine or the original plans, its about force regeneration and learning.
Thats what Russia is trying to do now, regenerate its damaged forces in Ukraine to build up enough power to take the Donbas and much of the south. For the last week weve been hearing of them sending more and more BTGs to Ukraine for this effort.
Now these reinforcing units are probably below strength, possessing of some seriously stressed and worn out soldiers and will suffer from some serious weaknesses, but still, the Russians are sending in more. Estimates were up from 65 BTG to maybe even 90.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 22
Quick update on the Battle of the Donbas as two different narratives seem to are floating around. The picture given by Ukrainian armed forces is that the Russians are continuing operations, but making little or no progress and suffering losses. mil.gov.ua/en/news/2022/0…
Here is last night's update with the portions on that battle excerpted.
The Ukrainian update this morning (here is the facebook link to the Ukrainian report, but you can use a translation service to read) is the same. Lots of Russian grinding around the edges but few advances. facebook.com/10006907384482…
Read 14 tweets
Apr 21
Stat of the day that I wasn’t expecting. Russian tank losses have been so high and Ukrainian so low, (and the Ukrainians have received so many new tanks and seized so many working Russian ones) that Ukraine has more tanks available now in country than Russia.
How the heck is Russia supposed to break through Ukrainian lines with fewer tanks, especially once the Ukrainians get all this new artillery and UAVs? It’s impossible to see happening unless the Russians can gain air dominance.
Otherwise it’s hard to see the Russians being any more successful during the Battle of the Donbas than they were during the battle of Kyiv.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 21
The US is already developing new systems specifically for Ukraine. What’s the implication of this, and of President Biden’s comments today that Russia will ‘never’ be able to occupy Biden? US thinks the Ukrainian military is in pretty good shape.
To clarify. US is developing/adapting a UAV system just to meet Ukraine’s military needs. That’s fast, and a sign of commitment.
And President Biden announced a large new military support program while publicly saying Russia will never be able to occupy all of Ukraine.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(