Sean Peche Profile picture
Apr 23 11 tweets 3 min read
Congrats, I heard you won $61bn in the lottery

Thanks, I guess inflation has some benefits

What are you going to buy?

I’m thinking shares, I don’t like the negative real yields of bonds & cash

but I’m worried about the macro outlook, so I want the latest info

Well let’s
2/
take a look at 2 companies that reported on Thursday night to see what’s on offer

For $61bn, you could buy 100% of Freeport-McMoran, (#FCX ) the world’s 3rd largest copper miner

sounds interesting, I know EVs use lots of copper

Revenue for trailing 12 mths (TTM) was $25bn
3/

Operating income was $9.6bn (GAAP)

and Free Cash Flow (FCF) was $5.6bn

~ 10% FCF yields sound great

Yes, but copper prices are high so maybe earnings aren’t sustainable

Ok, what do management think?

CEO - “The case for copper as a commodity is strong. I've been saying
4/
this for 20 years but it's never been better."

Great, what else?

Snapchat - #snap

My kids love that platform & I hear online advertising is growing

SNAP would cost you a little less, but it’s yours for $49bn

Revenue for the TTM was $4.4bn

Sorry, $4.4bn?

yes
5/
vs FCX's $25bn

yes

SNAP's operating income

sorry, "operating loss", was -$670m

What….operating loss?

Well talent doesn’t work for free

so it’s after $1.1bn of stock-based compensation (SBC) expense

which people exclude when calculating FCF

Exclude?

Yes because it’s
6/
non-cash - shares not money

but then that assumes employees cost nothing and you said,

“talent doesn’t work for free”

well the cash portion is included

Ok, so what’s their FCF for the TTM if I add back the $1.1bn

$203m

$203m!?

yes

But you said FCX generated $5.6bn
7/

I did

but FCX must make that every 2 weeks

sounds right

So buying FCX would cost a little more - $60bn vs $49bn

but yet they made 27x more FCF

yes

and how much did Freeport have to pay their “talent”?

$106m?

Hang on, $106m vs $1.1bn?

Yes

This seems crazy

It was
8/
crazier not long ago - SNAP has fallen 64% since September

SNAP management must be hugely bullish to justify this price

You tell me

“.. we are concerned that the operating environment ahead could be even more challenging, leading to further campaign pauses or advertiser
9/
budget reductions.”

But this doesn’t make sense

That's what I think,

But then I think Value investing is just common sense

apparently the "least common of all senses"

Many advisors & clients just look at historic performance when selecting funds

and in recent years,
10/
as interest rates fell, and higher valuations were justified, the Growth guys won

so they got the flows and bought stuff like SNAP up to crazy prices

But now the party is ending

and they/you sit with overpriced companies

with rising rates

Go look at the
11/
very current performance of the funds you own

Prepare for bad news, it’s ugly out there for that group

Is it too late to switch to Value?

That’s your call

Maybe the answer lies in pretending you won the lottery

and asking yourself what you’d buy today

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Peche

Sean Peche Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanPeche

Apr 26
Are you buying $TSLA because I saw they shot the lights out & I think @elonmusk is a genius?

Elon certainly is a special guy - he's built the 5th largest company in the world without advertising

But “special guys” are only one piece of the puzzle

Anyway, let’s dive in
2/
Tesla is currently valued at $1trn

And we know “trees don’t grow to the sky”

because planet earth is 4.5bn years old and the highest tree in the world is a Californian Redwood and “only” 115m tall

Let’s also not forget Netflix's reminder to us all that
3/
forecasting growth is easy on spreadsheets,

but difficult in reality,

So let’s approach this in reverse

What’s a fair earnings multiple for a steady-state, mature business?

Well, the S&P’s forward earnings multiple is 18,

but some capital-light, high return on capital
Read 11 tweets
Apr 19
The Baupost Group Billionaire, Seth Klarman, looks for security “mispricings”

and since he runs one of the world's largest & most successful hedge funds, he’s worth listening to

Shortly after arriving in the UK, 20 yrs ago, I met a “dodgy landlord” (his words)

and I asked
2/
him how he made a decent living with rental yields at 3% - 4%

He told me he only bought properties:
- at auctions (deceased estates / repossessions),
- on rainy afternoons,
- during winter

and because the season & weather & cash requirement of auctions dissuaded & excluded
3/
so many buyers,

the assets were mispriced

meaning he bought at yields above 30%

while those buying off Estate Agent & Developer glossy brochures received the paltry 3%- 4%

Because if you aren’t buying mis-priced assets,

should you really expect to generate superior
Read 11 tweets
Mar 24
If you were a CFO & wanted to show the highest cash balance at Qtr end, what would you do?

I’d sell every inventory item I could for cash,

collect every debtor possible,

and tell all my creditors that "supply chains are still a nightmare" but

the “cheque’s in the post”

and
2/
forget to tell them it’s dated for 1st of the new quarter

Exactly!

You delay paying your creditors until after qtr end

Now put your analyst hat on to discern the "truth" from the balance sheet

What, look for more than the words, “beat” or “miss” on briefing. com?

YES!
3/

What adjustments do you think are necessary to the Net Cash balance that management flaunt on their Non-Gaap presentations?

umm

deduct Creditors from the net cash balance (Cash minus ST and LT borrowings)?

Bingo, you got it in one

But isn’t that punitive, I mean they
Read 11 tweets
Mar 23
At the start of my career, I had the privilege of working for Bryan Hopkins at Old Mutual Asset Management

Bryan was a former Accounting Professor and he taught me a trick that I use regularly

He said, “always look at cumulative cash flow over a number of periods because
2/
cash flow in any one discrete period can be misleading. Cumulative cash flow is closer to the truth”

He’s right

From time to time, I see fund managers referring to a company’s high free cash flow yield over 1 year, but sometimes it’s due to falling inventory as working
3/
capital unwinds from years of inventory build

Except, you can’t unwind inventory forever so using the 1-year number is misleading

Cumulative cash flow offsetting this unwind against the inventory build from prior yrs is closer to the truth

Now let’s look at the Cumulative
Read 10 tweets
Mar 22
Now we all know that Jay is on a mission and isn’t letting high oil prices hold back his rate rising intentions,

all of which should be good for Value,

I’ve got a plan for the large Growth index constituents who want to stay relevant and be included in the Value index
2/
Don’t worry, this is free advice so Warren B can relax

(sorry Goldmans)

So, what’s the plan?

Just go out there & buy anything

but make it big and pay up

Don’t worry about paying huge goodwill numbers or if it slows your growth

the more goodwill & slower the growth,
3/
the better

But do it now while your market cap is large because these indices are all market-cap-weighted

But that makes no sense

How does paying goodwill mean it’s Value?

Good question but you see Russell’s Value indices use Book Value, not Tangible Book Value

In 2018
Read 11 tweets
Feb 14
Long term followers know one of my bugbears is Naspers / Prosus Management’s complete failure to unlock value for the SA savers

I don’t read much fiction and that's a good thing - you couldn’t make this story up

In April ‘21, Prosus sold 192m Tencent shares (2%) for $14.6bn
2/
Tencent today is 20% lower today - full marks?

No, 2/10

Why?

They lose 3 marks for agreeing not to sell any more Tencent shares for the next 3 yrs

so suffered the 20% hit on their remaining 29% stake

and stay exposed to the whims & fancies of the Chinese Government
3/
ok, I get it

So, what did they do with the $14.6bn?

Well, last year Prosus spent $6.3bn buying back stock at €89.20

That would cost $5.3bn today

= $1bn down the chute

And R53bn buying Naspers at R 3,318 / share that would cost R37bn today

R16.5bn of value destroyed
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(