It turned out the Russians refusal to use artillery on Ukrainian counter-attacks at Izyum had to do with a large set piece artillery barrage the Russians had planned to open their Donbas offensive across the entire front.
The logic chain of that thread fell apart on that point.
It also helped I had been tipped off about coming a coming article saying there was a Russian shortage in 160mm & 240mm mortar ammo because of the heavy use of those calibers in Syrian cities.
The article's...
3/
... publication was put off by the start of the Russian Donbas offensive.
You can now file this under "Trent Telenko can be wrong."
There were additional factors besides those two points that gave me a context to reach that conclusion.
4/
Back in late 2014 I joined a Ukrainian diaspora email list covering the Donbas war. At the time I was studying the 1945 artillery battle at Okinawa.
Weirdness popped out immediately looking at the artillery rocket impact pattern in Kramatorsk
The key to the map
o Green UXO duds,
o Red KIA/WIA
o Blue exploded, no casualties
Most of the rockets overshot the airfield.
Seven out of 41 rockets UXO is an 18% dud rate. 6/
This dud rate is better than the oldest Ex-Soviet stuff seen in Afghanistan (~30%), but not the less than 5% rate of duds seen in older Western ammo.
Acronyms:
UXO - unexploded ordnance
KIA - Killed in action
WIA - Wounded in action.
7/
A shell fuze is an explosive train from smaller to largest of a primer, a detonator and a booster charge meant to set off the main bursting charge of a shell
The photo clip to the right is from a youtube WW2 US Army training film
Note: Fuze =/= Fuse
8/
Generally, as artillery fuzes age, they get less reliable. This is because the chemicals in the Fuze's primer are the most unstable & subject to degrading over time.
Artillery ammunition of all sorts has a life span.
...over time as hot/cold cycles, humidity & trace contamination causes crystallization.
An 18% dud rate on Smerch rockets is a symptom of the aging of the primer in the rocket fuze, AKA a time expired munition.
10/
There were other indications of "time-ex" Russian artillery rocket munitions from the 2015 122mm Grad rocketing of Mariupol.
As rocket propellent ages, it generates marginally & unpredictably less thrust.
Mariupol's 'short' rocketing in the figure right below suggests that
11/
...happened in 2015.
US military practice is to treat solid rocket motors as a 10 year storage item requiring inspect/replace in a missile/rocket midlife depot level refresh
Demilitarizing artillery rockets & shells is an utter pain as it requires EPA regulatory permissions
12/
...for burning the explosives & propellants.
DCMA administers these 'demil' contracts, which is where much of the information I've related on 'time-ex' ammo came from.
Russia's wars in Chechnya & Syria and the 1980's Iraqi purchases of Soviet shells saw large amounts of 13/
Soviet Union's strategic reserve of artillery ammunition used up.
When the US Military overran Iraq in 2003. It found more artillery ammunition, mostly ex-Soviet, than in it's own war reserves.
These Iraqi munitions were destroyed in the US anti-IED campaign of 2004-2007.
14/
Now we get to the 1945 artillery fight at Okinawa.
The radar proximity "VT-Fuze" debuted for the first time in Pacific ground combat at Okinawa.
(I've posted a great deal about Okinawa, see below photos.) 15/
So what is this lack of Russian & Ukrainian airburst fuzing mean?
Good fuzing is expensive, requires high end manufacturing capability & quality control.
Russian artillery simply doesn't have either available.
See this time mortar fuze from Taiwan. 25/
The replacement of chemical percussion, mechanical, and electromechanical fuzing with pure electric-electronic fuzing for superior shell performance is a 21st Century trend Russia is ill prepared to follow.
Taiwan is just one example of this. 26/
This is a Romanian 120mm Mortar with PF-120 proximity fuze ARM shells.
Please carefully note the huge beaten ground caused by the shell fragments in the photo clips & video. 27/
The lack of Russian airburst shelling in Donbas utterly stands out when you look at the lay of the land after repeated shelling over time.
But the best way to upgrade Ukrainian artillery is going to be with NATO & other artillery fuzes to give Ukraine more airburst and other options versus Russia.
And the fuze that will help Ukraine the most is the ATK precision guidance kit fuzes for its incoming NATO 155mm
29/
The PGK turns ordinary 155mm shells into precision guided artillery projectiles (PGAP) at the cost of 10% of maximum range.
You can airlift 40 PGK for the weight of a single Excalibur guided artillery shell. 30/
The PGK requires minimal additional training to properly use and it will vastly reduce the required artillery shell tonnage for the same battlefield impact.
The only reason it cannot be used on current Ukrainian shells is they have the Russian 36mm fuze threads compared 31/
...to the 45mm used on NATO artillery shells.
So the UA would have to take 152mm and 203mm casings and machine out the threads to fit the PGK NATO fuse thread.
Ukraine has a plant in Sumy that manufactures 122mm, 152mm ammo, so this is not an unusual challenge for them.
32/
It is the little things in war that make all the difference.
Things like shell fuzes.
Why we have not seen the Western intelligence notice or Defense Departments & Defense Ministries to go there with upgrading Ukrainian artillery and mortar fuzes is a mystery...
33/
Elon Musk’s plan for XAI satellite data centers, and all use of space for any purpose, faces inevitable collapse until a solution emerges for the problem of Kessler Syndrome (see Wikipedia). 🧵
This will occur when enough collisions of small orbital debris pieces from old dead satellites hits the steadily increasing number of new satellites until the whole thing spirals into mass collisions.
Kessler Syndrome computes that this will destroy all existing
2/
...communications, navigation, observation and research satellites in low/medium orbit, and prevent all further satellites launched, for 40+ years, until enough pieces fall out of orbit into the Earth’s atmosphere.
3/
Do you remember all the 2023 US Navalist accounts o X that screamed at @johnkonrad and I about pointing out the containerized anti-ship OWA drone threat to the US fleet.
Welcome to 2026 Ukrainian anti-ship OWA drone threat, you US Navalist yo-yo's. ⬇️
"Operation Spiderweb with Chinese characteristics" is coming for you all, and we have the receipts.
We need a whole lot of air defense guns everywhere to stop drones that you guys still refuse to fund.
2/
For fun and reference of guns versus missile air defense, this YouTube test scenario pits 100 Shahed-136 one-way attack drones against the historic US Navy Task Force 38.1 from 1944.
THE UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY
Bombing Accuracy, USAAF Heavy and Medium Bombers in the ETO
MILITARY ANALYSIS DIVISION
First Edition 3 November 1945
Second Edition January 1947
You find both mission failures & gross errors were "excluded data" 2/
And that both increased altitude and the number of combat boxes involved made CEP worse.
>>This is essentially a complete tactical bomber cell in a box, sized for a small mobile drone team operating at brigade level or below. It is not a strategic deep-strike weapon, and it is not pretending to be one.