Ethan Zuckerman Profile picture
Apr 25 17 tweets 5 min read
Okay, like virtually everyone else who studies social media, I'm fascinated by @elonmusk's takeover of Twitter. Let me say upfront: I have no idea what Twitter will be like under Elon's leadership and neither do you. But that's the point.
We already know little about how Twitter handles content moderation or how their algorithms work, and taking the company private makes it likely we will know less. What we do know is this: two billionaires will now control four of the major digital public sphere platforms.
Zuckerberg, by virtue of his unusual "founders shares", has functional veto power over much of the decisionmaking within Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. (morningstar.com/articles/10612…) A privately held Twitter will likely give Musk similar personal power over Twitter.
It's embarrassing that we've been willing to have our public, civic conversations on platforms controlled by corporate boards. Musk's purchase of Twitter just makes that absurdity even more apparent. Unfortunately, the solution is not as simple as mass migration to Mastodon.
Don't get me wrong - I love Mastodon. I've had an account since 2016, and I'm basing some of my own projects on the Mastodon codebase. But it's not a good solution to assume that everyone will leave Twitter due to a change in ownership.
We're facing twin problems of finding alternative spaces that we have more control over, and problems of interoperability in maintaining the social relationships we've already built up on these platforms. Mastodon, in which individuals can run small, federated servers
is part of the solution. It's harder than it looks to scale one of those servers, though, and moderation is always hard. It's harder if you do the right thing, which is focusing on governance - how do you decide what's allowable speech within a community and how you enforce it.
But even with a mass exodus to Mastodon servers with thoughtful governance and moderation, we've got the problem of the folks we're leaving behind - the folks who don't leave Twitter, FB or any other closed platform. We need adversarial interoperability, as @doctorow puts it
I should be able to build a tool that lets you read posts from Twitter, various Mastodons, as well as other networks like Reddit, simultaneously, and through a tool you control. We've been building a version of that tool, called Gobo. It's hard work both technically and legally.
With a good aggregator plus something that lets you cross-post to Twitter and Mastodon, migrating off this platform without losing the relationships we've built up is more realistic. It would also allow a wave of experimentation with platform governance.
While I happen to think this is a good way to go, there are lots of other exciting projects out there. One of my favorites is Pubhub, a project in the Netherlands being led in part by Jose Van Dijck, one of the world's great social media scholars. computable.nl/artikel/nieuws…
It's designed to be privacy preserving and non-surveillant. I like some of the ideas coming from planetary.social (though the inability to delete worries me), and even some of what Project Liberty is working on. But we should get our priorities straight.
First, we should limit our investment in social networks we don't govern. No more hoping a better billionaire buys out a bad billionaire. No more begging for better moderation. Find a platform that wants you to govern, not one that wants to moderate you.
Second, fight for real interoperability. Existing multi-million user networks can't have veto power over future networks. You have a right to maintain your content and your relationships when you leave a platform. Third, build platforms that have a reason and a purpose.
Existing platforms try to be all things for all people. Is Twitter a robust civic public sphere? A place for shitposting? A place for experimental bot-based poetry? The fact that it's all makes it very hard to govern. Lots of social networks, aggregated, each with purpose.
I've written tons about this at publicinfrastructure.org and will surely write more. There's tons of fellow travelers working on this from @WeAreNew_Public to @tinysubversions. Let's use this moment to demand better alternatives, not just a better billionaire.
Well this blew up, at least as much as an academic thread can.

Check out my Soundcloud! By which I mean, subscribe to Reimagining the Internet, the podcast where my team and I talk with people trying to civic-focused alternatives to the existing web: publicinfrastructure.org/podcast/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ethan Zuckerman

Ethan Zuckerman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EthanZ

Apr 23
Conor Friedersdorf is right to point out that fighting mis/disinfo has become an industry, and sometimes a mindset... and that the assumptions behind that mindset aren't all correct. I was at the same conference and also worried about emerging groupthink.
If I were writing this piece - theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/… - my focus might have been on the limits of regulation to solve these problems. In other words, for all the enthusiasm of Senator Klobuchar and others, much of our current information disorder can't be regulated away.
Instead, it's become mainstream political speech. The problem, alas, is not algorithmic amplification so much as it is ensuring there are consequences for political speech that is false and dangerous. I wish that were as easy to solve as writing ML code to detect it.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 23, 2021
I got an interesting email from a young Nigerian today alerting me to the problem of social shaming and microlending. He wanted me to promote his petition - change.org/p/central-bank… - and so I did a little research. (1/n)
App-based microlending is popular in Nigeria, both because banks generally require collateral for loans and because the bureaucracy involved with lending can be overwhelming. So there's a flock of new lending sites springing up, like FairMoney. (2/n)
FairMoney reported lending out $93m USD in 2020 in amounts from $3-$1000. Interest rates ranged from 30-260% APR, against 15-20% APR for bank rates. In other words, these are payday loans with predatory terms, but they're what people can access. techcrunch.com/2021/02/18/wit… (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
Dec 18, 2020
Like Jimmy, I remember the web before section 230. At Tripod.com, we were providing homepage hosting services to thousands of users. Like Geocities, our main competitor, our product was free to use, supported by advertising.
We needed millions of users to make the economics of the product work, and we needed our support costs to be fairly low. Reviewing every piece of content before it was posted would not have been possible - we simply would not have offered our homepage building tool.
People figured out clever ways to use the server space we provided to share pirated software. As is typical in these cases, the users were often one step ahead of us - they'd learn how to mislabel a .rar file as a .jpg and evade our automated tools.
Read 15 tweets
Nov 23, 2020
I've been spending this fall at the Knight First Amendment Institute (@knightcolumbia), working through the ideas behind the forthcoming Institute for Digital Public Infrastructure that will be launching at @UMassAmherst at some point in 2021.
The main outcome of that work is a series of essays I'm writing with Chand Rajendra-Nicolucci (@chandrn_) on the "logics" of different types of social networks we see in use and in development. We've published five episodes so far (knightcolumbia.org/research/mappi…)
the most recent is on "civic logic", a set of small networks that operate with the explicit goals of making uncommon conversations more possible, bringing people together across ideologies and other divides.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 14, 2019
At Columbia J-school this evening for a conversation on "Private Platforms, Public Discourse". Hosted by the Knight 1st Amendment Institute, the conversation is about law, journalism, tech and whether there are regulatory or anti-trust methods to govern social media platforms.
Cindy Cohn of @EFF remembers an earlier internet where everyone having a printing press seemed liberatory, and wonders how we got to a moment where platforms are celebrating how widely they censor. We are less customers of these platforms, she says, "than hostages."
@EFF We don't have enough players in the existing digital public sphere, explains @jackbalkin. Need more types of social media with more rules and norms, a more innovative public sphere. "We could have many more social media systems doing many more things."
Read 43 tweets
Nov 13, 2019
Excited for tonight's talk at @datasociety by Dr. Charlton McIlwain (@cmcilwain) on his new book, "Black Software - The Internet and Racial Justice from the Afronet to Black Lives Matter". Gonna thread some tweets here.
@datasociety @cmcilwain Writing a history of black software was a scary thing to do, explains @cmcilwain - you can get lost in archives and never find your way out... which is a bad thing when you've got a book due. #databites
@datasociety @cmcilwain The starting point for @cmcilwain's book: #BlackLivesMatter . Success of this movement - the simple fact that people know what the movement stands and fights for is a testament to its power and visibility... last time we talked about these issues in depth in the US was the 1960s
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(