"The documents produced by Fusion GPS to date reflect hundreds of emails in which Fusion GPS employees shared raw, unverified, and uncorroborated information – including their own draft research and work product – with reporters."
"And they appear to have done so as part of a (largely successful) effort to trigger negative news stories about one [of] the Presidential candidates."
"the Fusion GPS co-founder urged the reporter to “call [a named U.S. Representative] or [a named U.S. Senator],” stating, “I bet they are concerned about what [Trump Advisor-1] was doing other than giving a speech over 3 days in Moscow.”
"Mook...could not recall any specific instances of legal advice that Perkins Coie provided based on Fusion GPS’s work. When asked if he would have remembered such advice if it had been given, Mook stated that such a question was difficult to answer given the passage of time."
Tech Executive-1 ignores the critical and dispositive fact that Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS to assist HFA and the DNC, not Tech Executive-1. Indeed, Tech Executive-1 did not pay at all for Fusion GPS’s services, and Perkins Coie did not charge Tech Executive-1 for such services
"Indeed, Tech Executive-1 does not cite a single case in which a lawyer’s client validly claimed privilege or work product protections over materials prepared for the benefit of another client."
"The Fusion Witness is, to the Government’s knowledge, the only Fusion GPS employee who exchanged emails with Tech Executive-1 concerning the Russian Bank-1 allegations (or any other issue)."
"The Fusion Witness also (i) acted as the firm’s primary “technical” expert; (ii) worked for an extended time period on issues relating to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; (iii) was a part of the team that handled work under Fusion’s contract with HFA and the DNC;"
"and (iv) met in 2016 with various parties – including Law Firm-1, Tech Executive-1, and the media – about the Russian Bank-1 allegations. As such, the Fusion Witness undoubtedly possesses unique insight to the core issue to be decided by the jury."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

Apr 26
1) On July 24, 2016, Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook publicly suggested for the first time that Russia was somehow helping Trump.

During an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Mook claimed that the Russian government was behind the release of a trove of DNC emails.
2) On July 28, 2016, CIA Dir John Brennan briefed Obama on a Clinton plan to tie Trump to Russian election interference “as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”
judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
3) In the weeks that followed the FBI’s July 31, 2016 opening of its Crossfire Hurricane investigation, Brennan took a number of actions that were intended to actively reinforce the basic premise behind Clinton’s plan—that Russia was interfering in the election to help Trump.
Read 19 tweets
Apr 23
"Eric Schwerin met with Vice President Biden on November 17, 2010."

"The logs also reveal that Schwerin met with various close aides of both Joe and Jill Biden at key moments in Hunter’s life when he was striking multi-million dollar deals in foreign countries, including China."
2) Also in 2010: Hunter Biden and Devon Archer traveled to China to “explore the possibility of commercial cooperation and opportunity.”

They met with the largest and most powerful government fund leaders in China — even though their firm, Rosemont, was both new and small.
3) Like Schwerin's meeting w/Joe Biden, the timing of Hunter's & Archer's meeting was also curious.

It occurred just hours before Hunter's father vice-president Joe Biden met with Chinese President Hu in Washington as part of the Nuclear Security Summit.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 20
1) Reminder that Reid's letters to FBI Dir Comey regarding Trump - the first on Aug. 27, 2016 & the other on October 30, 2016 - originated from Reid's personal briefing by CIA Director Brennan in early August.
2) Reid sent a letter on Aug. 27, 2016, to Comey claiming that “the evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s campaign continues to mount.”

Reid called for a public investigation asking that investigation be completed before the election.
3) Three days later House Democrats wrote to Comey asking him to investigate Trump–Russia collusion in the context of the purported DNC hacking.

Their letter asked Comey to investigate “connections between Trump campaign officials and Russian interests.”
Read 10 tweets
Apr 19
1) "The time's been long overdue...it was time to get rid of a biased middleman who was negotiating debates"

What neither @GOPChairwoman or @IngrahamAngle acknowledge is the GOP's & Fox News' role in these issues.

2) McDaniel noted the media "bias" that favors Dem candidates during debates.

We all know this to be true. But the GOP did nothing for decades.

In 2016 and 2020, Trump was hampered by highly biased moderators...
foxnews.com/media/ingraham…
3) During the 2nd 2020 debate, Trump brought up Hunter's laptop to Biden.

Biden cited a letter from our IC officials - claiming that Trump was lying.

@kwelkernbc then stopped any further discussion.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 15
A question for @BlackRock & @Vanguard_Group

You've held positions in Twitter for years. Price & performance has deteriorated.

How do you explain to shareholders your resistance to @elonmusk offer?

How do you explain not taking simple steps to enhance performance long ago?
Given the incredibly simple steps that are required:

1) Allowing the platform to run as an open forum for Free Speech

2) Encouraging subscriber growth rather than banning conservative ideologies

3) Removing wasteful overhead

Your refusal to do so raises very real questions.
Are you using your shareholders' money to promote your own ideologies - at the direct expense of increased return to your shareholders?

Because, honestly, that's the only explanation I can come up with given the steps you've allowed to be taken in the management of Twitter.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 15
1) He must love us - or at least our Republic.

He is, quite literally, risking everything he built to help restore Free Speech and rebalance the system.

And make no mistake, the fight for Twitter is very real.
2) Twitter's stock price was in the low $30's prior to Elon's purchases.

Elon is offering $54.20 - a ~65% increase.

The offer is being fought not only by management, but by the media and government.

And shockingly, the other institutional shareholders.
3) The fact that Elon's offer for Twitter is at a huge premium - and is being hotly contested - tells you that Twitter is NOT being run for profit.

It's value - like most media properties - is not purely financial. It resides w/control & the ability to censor & shape narratives.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(