My dude doesn’t even allow all legally-required speech in his factories, nor does he squelch all illegal hostile speech and discriminatory behavior there. #OnHere he has repeatedly said things that the law doesn’t permit.
I mean, that is not even the most egregiously wrong misunderstanding this tweet displays about the company he proposes to run, in an industry where he will go from mere participant to one of the biggest players.
Anyone who has moderated an internet forum at any level knows that maintaining free speech doesn't just mean preventing excessive moderation, but also preventing the heckler's veto. You can't tolerate intolerance. Cf. Popper's original words: skepchick.org/2017/08/popper…
To borrow another analogy, all markets need regulation, even the marketplace of ideas. Platforms can and should go farther than government regulation might. Musk has benefited enormously from market regulation, so understands that on some level.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Twitter’s would-be owner said a dumb thing about political polarization, which was very wrong and widely critiqued. (Claimed Democrats have gone so far left that centrists who remain centrist are now Republicans.) In fact, a decade or so of social science shows the opposite… 1/
Dems and Rs both became more extreme in recent decades For the last 10 years or so, people have known that Republicans went farther right than Dems went left. As @drvolts wrote in 2012(!), “The left’s gone left, the right’s gone nuts.” grist.org/politics/asymm… 2/
Don’t believe that? Consider the the extremes. Democrats are…fumbling the wildly popular campaign platform of sleepy moderate Joe Biden. It includes radical proposals like paid sick leave and childcare funding, student loan relief, etc. But it’s too radical for some Dems! 3/
One of my metrics for judging how journalists write about "lab leak" claims has been how they discuss Nick Wade's racist book. Here's the paltry mention in Chan and Ridley's Viral. No way to know what his conjectures might have been, or why these scientists didn't care for them!
All we can know is that Wade, formerly a feted science writer at the New York Times and elsewhere, is really an edgy outsider who will risk his reputation to tell the truth. About…something. No point in their describing these bold truths.
Scientists who actually read Wade's book hated it. Here's a review from @splcenter, documenting Wade's reliance on discredited racist groups. splcenter.org/hatewatch/2014…
The furin cleavage site (FCS) is a feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that makes it more virulent in humans, confers little (if any) benefit in bats, and is not a feature previously seen in the closest relatives of SARS. 2/
Early in the pandemic, like…January/February 2020, some experts looked at it and thought it was so odd that it might suggest human engineering. Those scientists later realized that the feature wasn’t so unusual in the broader SARS family tree, and changed their minds. 3/
No shade on Amazon reviews, but if the only reviewers an author tweets out are Amazon reviews, they’re getting beaten up (or ignored), by the press and expert reviewers.
This choice adds tremendous confusion, since it represents zoonotic spilllover and the average reader will hear "laboratory-associated" and think the infection was *associated* with a *laboratory*. It only merits celebration if you really want the "lab" conclusion no matter what.
Alas, the IC doesn't separate "zoonosis in the field to lab workers who were exposed to what farmers, hunters, miners, hikers, etc. face routinely" from "someone stuck a poop swab in their nose" from "devious experiments created a monster that cinematically escaped the lab."
Spillover from infected bats to farmed mink or civets or whatever in farms right at the mouth of the cave are pretty likely. Spillover to people from there is also likely. Spillover specifically to lab techs going out to sample viruses using protective gear is less likely.
What?, indeed. An infection by researchers in the field, who are infected doing exactly what farmers, miners, spelunkers, etc. might do, is not a lab escape. cnn.com/2021/10/29/pol…
This is all correct, though. Not a comprehensive version of the case for zoonosis, but sensible weighting of available evidence.
Meanwhile this is incredibly thin, and not anything that isn't already public. Not sure how they justify "moderate" confidence from this thin reed.