Josh Rosenau Profile picture
Apr 27 4 tweets 2 min read
My dude doesn’t even allow all legally-required speech in his factories, nor does he squelch all illegal hostile speech and discriminatory behavior there. #OnHere he has repeatedly said things that the law doesn’t permit. Image
I mean, that is not even the most egregiously wrong misunderstanding this tweet displays about the company he proposes to run, in an industry where he will go from mere participant to one of the biggest players.
Anyone who has moderated an internet forum at any level knows that maintaining free speech doesn't just mean preventing excessive moderation, but also preventing the heckler's veto. You can't tolerate intolerance. Cf. Popper's original words: skepchick.org/2017/08/popper… Image
To borrow another analogy, all markets need regulation, even the marketplace of ideas. Platforms can and should go farther than government regulation might. Musk has benefited enormously from market regulation, so understands that on some level.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Rosenau

Josh Rosenau Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoshRosenau

Apr 29
Twitter’s would-be owner said a dumb thing about political polarization, which was very wrong and widely critiqued. (Claimed Democrats have gone so far left that centrists who remain centrist are now Republicans.) In fact, a decade or so of social science shows the opposite… 1/
Dems and Rs both became more extreme in recent decades For the last 10 years or so, people have known that Republicans went farther right than Dems went left. As @drvolts wrote in 2012(!), “The left’s gone left, the right’s gone nuts.” grist.org/politics/asymm… 2/
Don’t believe that? Consider the the extremes. Democrats are…fumbling the wildly popular campaign platform of sleepy moderate Joe Biden. It includes radical proposals like paid sick leave and childcare funding, student loan relief, etc. But it’s too radical for some Dems! 3/
Read 17 tweets
Dec 23, 2021
One of my metrics for judging how journalists write about "lab leak" claims has been how they discuss Nick Wade's racist book. Here's the paltry mention in Chan and Ridley's Viral. No way to know what his conjectures might have been, or why these scientists didn't care for them!
All we can know is that Wade, formerly a feted science writer at the New York Times and elsewhere, is really an edgy outsider who will risk his reputation to tell the truth. About…something. No point in their describing these bold truths.
Scientists who actually read Wade's book hated it. Here's a review from @splcenter, documenting Wade's reliance on discredited racist groups. splcenter.org/hatewatch/2014…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 18, 2021
This thread of Alina’s is weird, and perfectly encapsulates the shifting goalposts that always accompany conspiracy theories. Let’s review:
The furin cleavage site (FCS) is a feature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that makes it more virulent in humans, confers little (if any) benefit in bats, and is not a feature previously seen in the closest relatives of SARS. 2/
Early in the pandemic, like…January/February 2020, some experts looked at it and thought it was so odd that it might suggest human engineering. Those scientists later realized that the feature wasn’t so unusual in the broader SARS family tree, and changed their minds. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Nov 25, 2021
No shade on Amazon reviews, but if the only reviewers an author tweets out are Amazon reviews, they’re getting beaten up (or ignored), by the press and expert reviewers. Image
I see why the authors didn’t decide to share this with readers. washingtonpost.com/outlook/amid-a… ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
Oct 30, 2021
This choice adds tremendous confusion, since it represents zoonotic spilllover and the average reader will hear "laboratory-associated" and think the infection was *associated* with a *laboratory*. It only merits celebration if you really want the "lab" conclusion no matter what.
Alas, the IC doesn't separate "zoonosis in the field to lab workers who were exposed to what farmers, hunters, miners, hikers, etc. face routinely" from "someone stuck a poop swab in their nose" from "devious experiments created a monster that cinematically escaped the lab."
Spillover from infected bats to farmed mink or civets or whatever in farms right at the mouth of the cave are pretty likely. Spillover to people from there is also likely. Spillover specifically to lab techs going out to sample viruses using protective gear is less likely.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 29, 2021
What?, indeed. An infection by researchers in the field, who are infected doing exactly what farmers, miners, spelunkers, etc. might do, is not a lab escape. cnn.com/2021/10/29/pol…
This is all correct, though. Not a comprehensive version of the case for zoonosis, but sensible weighting of available evidence.
Meanwhile this is incredibly thin, and not anything that isn't already public. Not sure how they justify "moderate" confidence from this thin reed.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(