1/ Below is a 20y chart of oil prices and the Baltic Dry Index.

Aside from being economically sensitive, there are a number of other reasons the two follow each other quite closely.

🧵
2/ As the oil price rises, ships slow down to achieve better fuel economy and save on fuel costs.

In a high oil price environment, ships will slow until the lowest total cost of operation is found.

This slowing reduces effective capacity and causes charter rates to rise.
3/ Both ships and oil also tend to follow the same investment cycle where a boom of investment leads to a supply glut, ensuing bust, and a long period of under-investment which sets up for another period of high rates. Rinse, repeat.
4/ Even though demand growth for both oil and #drybulk trade has been muted in recent years as global GDP growth slows, underinvestment this cycle has been especially acute leading to high rates for both, and extremely favorable outlooks going forward.

5/ But whereas oil now has short cycle shale always threatening to crash the party 18 months from now, ships ordered today are now taking 3 years before they deliver and capacity to add ship supply is limited.
6/ Although both oil prices and drybulk rates tend to follow the same long cycle, the two often diverge for months and years before reconverging as each market has its own idiosyncrasies and seasonality.
7/ With both markets very tight and #drybulk now coming off its seasonal lows, will #drybulk rates and equities be the relative outperformers?

History suggests they just might...
8/ The other important takeaway from the 20y chart is that #drybulk and shipping in general is a very high beta play on the investment cycle with the largest relative value changes peak to trough... a little extra juice if you see an extended period of inflation coming.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AllThingsVentured

AllThingsVentured Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AllVentured

Apr 17
1/ I'm going to pound the table a bit more about and show that shipbuilding capacity is insufficient to replace scrapping let alone accommodate trade volume growth.

But this time we will look at the global aggregate merchant fleet including all sectors.

🧵...
2/ Across all sectors, the global orderbook is only ~10% of the active fleet compared to ~8% that is already beyond economic life in the new high fuel cost/low emissions requirement paradigm. It the time it takes the ~10% to deliver, ~14% more will approach end of economic life.
3/ In 2022, ships reaching critical decision age whether to scrap or repair for compliance increases significantly and continues to increase each year this decade.

Notice in 2022 and beyond, the capacity of ships delivered fails to match capacity hitting the new 20 year wall.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 16
1/ 15 months ago I penned an article entitled "Welcome to the New Container Shipping Supercycle" questioning the premises of popular conceptions of supply and demand at the time.

Some reflections on what I got right and what I got wrong.

A 🧵...

seekingalpha.com/article/439810…
2/ New ship deliveries are not hard to predict 2 years into the future as it takes upwards of 18 months to build most ships from contract date. A dearth of new ordering through late 2020 ensured insufficient supply coming to market to through 2023 to meet demand.
3/ I was also correct that there was limited capacity to add additional megamax ships in 2024.

What I completely underestimated was the enormous demand and shipbuilding slot availability for new panamax ships in lieu of available megamax capacity.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 9
1/ #Tankers are the biggest beneficiary of changing trade patterns due to Russian sanctions. PERIOD.

A look into why tanker rates are surging this week and why this is just the beginning.

A 🧵...
2/ The picture is becoming even clearer that Russian oil which used to go via pipeline and short sea to Europe will go all the way to China and **BACK** instead.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3/ **BACK** from China? YES. The West is structurally short on refining capacity and the deficit is getting larger as Russian refining capacity becomes shut in and European refiners struggle to source the slate needed to run at full capacity. reuters.com/business/energ…
Read 16 tweets
Apr 3
1/ After the initial spike on the news of the Ukraine invasion tanker rates initially retraced due to lack of employment while Russian exporters sorted out details on who would buy the oil.

With buyers found, aframax and suezmax rates are moving higher again on tight ship supply
2/ Even the massively oversupplied VLCC fleet has seen an uptick in rates (to slightly less loss-making levels) on the burgeoning tightness in the market.

But until this excess capacity in VLCC is removed from the market rates for smaller classes are likely to remain capped.
3/ So the question is how quickly is supply coming back to the market and when can we expect this VLCC excess capacity to be absorbed?

I will attempt to put the monthly 400kb/d OPEC capacity increase schedule into context as it relates to seaborne volumes:
Read 10 tweets
Apr 2
1/ Simandou back on track with a new firm deadline to start shipping 3/31/25.

At 100MMt/yr it will be second only to Vale's S11D mine in its impact to seaborne ton miles.

There are not enough ships nor enough shipbuilding capacity through 2025 to accommodate this start date.
2/ Lets do some back of the envelope math:

Capesize round trip from Guinea to China around 110 days at 11kt = 3.3 trips per year.

To ship 100MM tons this distance you need an additional ~145 Newcastlemax ships. This is roughly equivalent to the ENTIRE orderbook today.
3/ But todays orderbook will be barely sufficient to keep up with the new normal of earlier demolitions let alone accommodate the massive growth coming from Simandou:
Read 6 tweets
Mar 13
1/ A reply to Alex Turnbull @alexbhturnbull on his Reply to Zoltan Pozsar.

Zoltan is spot on with his high ocean freight thesis. Alex's rebuttal that commodities will trade overland instead is a nice thought but it doesn't actually work that way.
2/ Zoltan recently published a piece titled "Bretton Woods III" hypothesizing among other things that if Russian commodities go to China instead of the West it would cause very high ocean freight rates.
3/ @alexbhturnbull's Substack reply to Zoltan:

"One of the big losers in all of this is likely to be freight shipping: as China is likely to trade more with Russia the appeal of overland transport is going to be significant here both to avoid detection and ensure capacity."
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(