Alright team, evening thread on Russian logistics in Ukraine. People frequently claim the Russians have logistical issues. But do they?
Well, with some public information and a little bit of math and abstraction, we can figure this out for ourselves.
The Russians themselves actually give us a very important piece of information - they just release how many fire missions they've shot each day. By this we can make a few assumptions and calculate the volume of artillery ammunition they're firing.
It's about 1000 missions/day.
The Russians have about 100 BTGs in theater, but of those probably only half are probably going to be active at a time. So each BTG is executing 20 fire missions per day.
The standard Soviet "unit of fire" for a fire mission was 80 rounds. Clearly, in practice this will vary, from single-round Krasnopol strikes to rocket batteries wiping out square kilometers of real estate, so we'll take 80 rounds as the average "weight of steel per mission."
This means that every BTG engaged will be firing 1600 rounds per day. Let's abstract these as 152mm rounds, which weigh about 100 lbs each (45kg for you... foreigners). Thus, 100 rounds weigh five tons, seven once you count propellant and primers. (155mm shells pictured)
Conveniently this is exactly the weight rating of the KAMAZ-43115 military truck, in use by Russia.
A 2S19 howitzer can carry something like 48 rounds internally. The Russians don't seem to use a separate artillery transloader like the US does.
What this means is that every BTG in combat, every day, is probably getting something like two resupply convoys daily. Eight trucks in each convoy are going to be nothing but artillery ammunition. This isn't going into anything else, just shells.
So we're looking at 50 convoys per 12-hour period, with at least 400 trucks just dedicated to hauling artillery ammunition. This isn't even going into any other supplies, or supplying units in reserve, or humanitarian aid, etc. Just shells, rockets and missiles.
Granted, artillery shells are, to use a term of art, "God-damn heavy." They can dwarf other logistical requirements.
This does, however, provide an example of the sheer scale of Russian logistical efforts in theater.
(similar US operations pictured)
/end
Addendum: there's a joke about an engineer sitting down to design a chicken-plucking machine, and the first thing he says is, "First we'll assume the chicken is a sphere."
I'm doing a bit of that here, but I hope you get my point. ;)
Postscript Addendum: Ukraine recently (o/a June 12th) claimed that the Russians have been hitting them with 50,000 shells daily, which lines up closely with my estimates above.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The closest historical analogy to the Ukrainian War I can think of is the American Civil War - ironically a conflict that Europeans have always shied away from carefully studying.
A thread.⬇️
The underlying causes of the American Civil War festered for decades, finally erupting into open conflict after a series of political calculations and miscalculations brought down a national compromise that increasingly resembled a house of cards.
Ditto Ukraine. I've said elsewhere the number of political offramps available to Western leaders to avoid this war were so numerous that the fact war broke out can only be explained as the result of anti-Russian policy - clearly miscalculated policy given the results thus far.
Top 10 pro-Ukrainian talking points - and why they're nonsense.⬇️
10. Ukraine is a democracy!
False. The last free and fair election in Ukraine - not held under an ultranationalist jackboot after the 2014 coup - was in 2010.
All elections in Ukraine have been suspended since 2022, and Zelensky's five-year term from 2019 expired months ago.
9. Russia is an autocracy!
False. Vladimir Putin and United Russia enjoy approval ratings among the Russian public that are extremely high, even in polling conducted by Western-backed, anti-Putin organizations.
Putin is popular enough to win any election held in Russia handily.
How many plans has NATO gone through to try to beat Russia in Ukraine?
Let's count 'em!
Plan A: The FGM-148 Javelin
It seems absurd now, but in late 2021 NATO's leadership thought Javelin was a tank-deleting magic wand that would deter Putin from challenging Zelensky's scheme to conquer the LDPR.
Javelin failed in service and is a rare sight on the battlefield.
Plan B: The Kazakh Gambit
The West quite obviously fomented an uprising in Kazakhstan in January 2022 in hopes of distracting Russia from the then-boiling Ukrainian crisis.
Didn't work. CSTO troops arrived and helped the Kazakh government crush the would-be color revolution.
Late last week the Ukrainian command, seeing their offensive in Sudzha-Koronevo bog down, tried to expand the flanks of their salient into Russian territory in Kursk. Part of this was an attack on the Glushkovo district to the west.
The Glushkovo District is somewhat isolated from the Russian interior by the Seim River.
Having learned the wrong lessons from their 2022 counteroffensive in Kherson, the AFU command decided to try to induce a wholesale Russian withdrawal by attacking the bridges over the Seim.
The large road bridge at Glushkovo, the district center, would be their first target. As in Kherson two years ago, HIMARS fired on the bridge with GMLRS. As in Kherson two years ago, it was ineffective.
Unlike in Kherson two years ago, the Russians killed the HIMARS launcher.
Today was probably the worst day for the Armed Forces of Ukraine since February 2022.
Let's walk through it.
The Russians started the day off by destroying two HIMARS launchers at their hide site in Sumy. This has likely ended GMLRS support for the Kursk operation temporarily.
Next to emerge was a video of a MiG-29* struck at an airfield near Dnipropetrovsk, just as it was being armed and the pilot had climbed in for preflight.
Once again the Russians coldly waited to cause maximum casualties among key AFU personnel.
* initially reported as an Su-24
13 Ukrainian soldiers were caught on camera surrendering in Kursk, and today was the first day I didn't even hear substantive rumors of new AFU advances in the area. Instead they seem to have lost considerable ground.
Top 10 Failed Wonderweapons of the Ukrainian War⬇️
My criteria are simple - these are weapons (defined loosely) that were heavily hyped by Western pundits that actually failed in service.
So, for example, the Leopard 2 isn't on here because it's actually a perfectly functional tank that has performed in line with other tanks.
10. The Ukrainian Foreign Legion
After the war kicked off, Western outlets began encouraging adventurous foreigners to travel to Ukraine to fight. These new recruits were housed in barracks at the Yavorov Training Ground.
One Russian missile strike largely ended the project.