A few weeks ago, as the "new phase" was being discussed, I suggested we should look for a couple things happening in the east and south of Ukraine.
We're very early in that new phase & there are indicators those things are happening.
Let's review what we should see. 1/12
First, let's talk the Russian army (RU from here out).
RU has attempted to regenerate the forces mauled in the 1st phase. If they follow their doctrine, regeneration usually means new personnel, repair/exchange of equipment, resupply, rest & likely a lot of new leaders.
2/
Given the time & desire of Putin to have a May victory, it's likely little of that happened.
RU likely has either low-strength units, several units consolidated into one, or units poorly manned.
Reports indicate 2-man tank crews (3 needed) & BMP w/ few infantry in back. 3/
What RU has done is reinforce with lots (repeat, LOTS) of tube and rocket artillery.
That is according to RU doctrine.
To penetrate an enemy's defense, RU uses mass artillery barrages all along the front.
They've been doing that. And it is deadly. 4/
There's two ways to counter massive artillery strikes.
1. Get out from under it (giving up land) 2. Conduct counterfire with your own artillery after pinpointing the enemy's guns with radar. 5/
While Ukraine's army (UA from here out) have some Russian 152 mm cannons, and they are receiving LOTS of guns (155 mm cannons) from the US & NATO, there's 2 problems.
1. UA is running low on 152 (Russian) ammo 2. The western guns/ammo ain't there yet. 6/
Yeah, yeah, I know @PentagonPresSec said the guns/radars are arriving fast, and *some* are already there. But they're not all at the front, with the ammo, just yet.
Things just don't magically move to the front & get into the fight immediately in combat. 7/
A seque: during combat our division fielded MRAPs (mine-resisted ambush protective) trucks, due to an ⬆️IED threat.
Trucks. Not hard to learn. Not hard to drive. No triggers to pull.
It took us awhile.
Fact: fielding ANY new equipment to units in combat takes time. 8/
So there will be counterfire fights between RU and UA, but it might be awhile.
So UA has to give up ground.
When they do that, the RU will send in "reconnaissance in force" or RFI.
Small combat units to take limited objectives in multiple places. 9/
That's what we're seeing now in several locations in the east & south.
Lots of Russian artillery barrages against the front line, followed by smaller RU combat units attempting to seize terrain/cities/critical objectives.
RU artillery is working. The RU maneuver forces...10/
...are undermanned, not well supplied, not well led, are on ground they're not familiar with, and they don't do maneuver all that well.
So we're seeing RU forces temporarily take ground, then being pushed back by the smart, better led, more adaptive active defense of the UA. 11/
Finally...we're about 7-10 days (at best) into this second phase. It will go for awhile. New forces are feeling each other out in the east.
RU will initially outgun with arty, then it may become a big arty duel.
But UA maneuver force will outperform the RU. 12/12
*resistant* not resisted. Sorry.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few folks suggested I've been "bold" in some of my predictions accompanying the analysis I've provided on @CNN regarding this conflict.
Beyond tactical assessments, there are 2 primary reasons I've said Ukraine would win this fight.
Here's a short 🧵 on why I say this. 1/17
Reason 1:
Conventional joint & combined arms operations are hard. Real hard. Exceedingly hard.
Coordinating actions of tanks, infantry, artillery, engineers, air defense, air support, naval opns, amphibious landings, special opns & logistics support is tough. 2/
Doing so takes intense training of individuals in their specific skills, exercises that build the capabilities of interprofessional teams who pull theose skills together, the understanding of complex equipment & doctrine, communicating intent...and great leadership. 3/
In India, Boris Johnson was asked if RU "could win the war" in UKR.
He answered "look, it is a realistic possibility."
One must consider the "context" of the remark before judging...but...
In my view, Putin has already lost, strategically.
Here's why. 1/4
-Putin is now seen as a war criminal, a global pariah. He will never stand on a world stage again.
-RU Army has proven to be inept & have repeatedly violated the law of land warfare.
-RU did not achieved any original war aims/strategic objectives
-RU economy is in tatters.
2/4
-The people of UKR will NEVER be subjugated...and UKR will NEVER be successfully occupied.
-UKR's govt has emerged as a modern nation-state & will be a future key leader in Europe.
-@NATO is united & will become even stronger
-The US has reemerged as a world leader 3/4
How 'bout a 🧵on the artillery sent to Ukraine, as the narrative is bouncing between "this is pretty good," to "it's still not enough," to "NATO/US needs to do more!"
The devil is in the details.
(As a former tanker I'm not an expert on arty, but I've used it in combat) 1/10
1st, the towed artillery.
There are 2 types. I don't know how many of each are being sent but here are some details.
The older models are the "M198" (cannon-cockers say "M-one-niner-eight"). Produced in 1969, it's a good cannon.
Range 14-30 km, depending on the round. 2/
The new models are the M777 ("M-triple 7" in cannon-cocker speak).
A great system.
Half the weight of the M198, due to titanium construction. Uses a digital fire-control system that provides navigation, pointing & self-location.
.@jimsciutto provided tapes of alleged conversations between Russian soldiers to @donlemon at the start of his show tonight.
In listening, I thought of 2 things: 1. There is no trust between leaders & led in the Russian Army...that will contribute to their defeat. 1/3
2. Schofield's definition of discipline-which cadets learns their 1st week at West Point-remains relevant to combat leaders in any army, but it doesn't seem important in Russia.
That "definition" was provided by MG Schofield in 1879:
2/3
"The discipline which makes the soldiers of a free country reliable in battle is not to be gained by harsh or tyrannical treatment. On the contrary, such treatment is far more like to destroy than to make an army."
Every fighting force requires trust between leaders & led. 3/3
RU doctrine emphasizes leading w/ massive arty prep. It's what they do.
Artillery is "imprecise." It hits areas, not targets (unless it's precision guided).
Each size shell has a CEP (circular area of probability) for killing. 1/7
Artillery is a physical & psychological weapon:
-Those who fire arty don't "see" the target (other than on plots). Those on the receiving end know it's incoming when it strikes.
-Arty can kill, maim, cause concussions & bleeding ears.
But most of all, they cause fear. 2/
RU artillery can fire ranges up to about 30 miles (if they use rocket assisted projectiles, or RAP) to 22-50 miles (like the Uragan multiple launched rocket systems)
The only way to stop: find them (through counter-fire radar or overhead drones), then fire at them. 3/