LawBeat Profile picture
Apr 29 12 tweets 7 min read
🚨Hanuman Chalisa Row: A Mumbai Sessions Court to hear bail plea moved by MP Navneet Rana & MLA husband Ravi Rana. Thread for live updates from the courtroom will be posted here.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
The Sessions Court on April 26 had denied immediate relief to the couple and had directed the Mumbai Police to file response on couple's bail plea by April 29 (today).
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Advocate Rizwan Merchant, counsel for the couple has reached and seeks adjournment till tomorrow.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
SPP Pradeep Gharat informs Court that State's reply as sought earlier has been filed today and expresses his inability to be present tomorrow.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
SPP apprises the court that he has to appear tomorrow before Alibaug Court in Arnab Goswami case pertaining to suicide of Anvay Naik.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Merchant: "If you will argue today, then finish your submissions and arguments. you can't have your cake and eat it too."
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Merchant: We will come tomorrow at 11am.
Bench: You finish your arguments at 2:30pm in the afternoon session.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Bench: In trial court it was fixed that you will argue matter on 29th. We know the urgency in the matter.
SPP: No your Lordship. I will be present tomorrow at 3pm
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Merchant agrees and says that he will be there for arguments at 3pm tomorrow.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
SPP: So many counsels, I have to fight alone (laughter ensues in court).
Judge: What about me then!!!
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
Bench: Hearing adjourned till 3pm tomorrow.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
The development took place upon the request of Adv. Rizwan Merchant, Ranas' counsel. However, SPP Pradeep Gharat objected to the same and insisted that the matter should be heard today.
#HanumanChalisaControversy #NavneetRana
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ha…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Apr 29
Allahabad High Court refuses to interfere in Varanasi Court's decision dismissing an application u/s 156(3) CrPC against Kunal Kamra for his tweet with a morphed saffron-colored image of the Supreme Court building with a BJP flag hoisted in the Court's foyer. Image
In December 2020, the Court of Judicial Magistrate Diwakar Kumar had dismissed the complaint against Kamra for want of jurisdiction as the offence was not committed within its local jurisdiction.
Upholding the magistrate's order, Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court, Varanasi Aradhana Kushwaha had also rejected the revision plea filed by a local Lawyer Saurabh Tiwari.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 29
BREAKING: Plea in Supreme Court seeks court monitored Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe factum of “illegally & arbitrarily” running bulldozers over properties of petitioner(s) in Khargone, Madhya Pradesh, after communal riots broke out on April 10, 2022
Petitioners from Khargone and Sendhua are aggrieved due to the allegedly illegal bulldozing of their homes and have approached Supreme Court seeking initiation of action under “Criminal law against the perpetrators of destruction to the lives and properties of these Petitioners”
According to the petition in SC, “Ram Navami procession played objectionable songs on DJ and used instigative communal slogans while crossing the Talab Chowk area near Jama Masjid in Khargone district of Madhya Pradesh which led to heated argument between two religious groups.”
Read 5 tweets
Apr 29
#DelhiHighCourt to shortly hear a plea wherein #AIIMS had sought for release of funds from the Centre for the treatment of children with rare diseases. The central is expected to reply today.
ASG: We are very alive to the sensitivity of the matter. We are not at all considering it adversarial. I have spoken to the Chief Secretary.
ASG: A similar matter was listed before the Karnataka HC, the HC said as an interim measure asking the Central and State to contribute, the matter went to #SupremeCourt . The apex court had passed a speaking order.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 29
Today, speaking at the 39th Chief Justices Conference, Chief Justice of India, Justice NV Ramana re-visited the topic of expediting the process of recommending names for elevation to High Courts, with an emphasis on social diversity.
"Due to our collective efforts, we could fill 126 vacancies in various High Courts, in less than an year. We are expecting 50 more appointments...", the CJI said.
Noting that in the past one year, nine new judges have been appointed to the Supreme Court and 10 new Chief Justice to the High Courts, the CJI thanked his Brothers in the Collegium for their cooperation.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 29
#SupremeCourt hearing plea by doctors seeking permission to appear in the mop up round. These are the candidates who appeared in the #NEETPG2021
Earlier, the Court had cancelled AIQ mop up round. Directs DGHS to conduct a fresh counselling for 146 new seats in government colleges. The DGHS shall invite options for new counselling within 24 hours and the counselling shall be completed in 72 hours thereafter.
Senior Advocate Gopal Shankarnarayanan appearing for a student submitted that the State of Telangana has not followed the directions of the Court.

J Chandrachud: What can we do now, the admissions are done, the students have paid the fees. Let's leave the hardship as it is.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 29
#SupremeCourt to hear plea filed by a Pakistan national detained in India seeking bail to apply for citizenship in India stating that Pakistan will not accept him.
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the concerned person is in detention and it has been almost 11 years.
Senior Advocate Sanjay Parikh appearing for the petitioner submitted that We had moved an application before the High Court, the High Court said that move to the Supreme Court as the matter is pending before Supreme Court concerning foreigners.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(