Battle of the Donbas seems to be already have turned into a battle of attrition that holds out almost no possibility of a major Russian victory and more likely will peter out in the next week or so because of unsustainable losses.
Lets look at losses. Using claimed Ukrainian losses of Russian equipment as a gauge of combat intensity, it seems that the last 10 days have seen a major increase of fighting with much heavier losses being suffered (presumably by both sides).
I made this chart showing cjlaimed losses over 2 day periods between 14 April and just released information for today. Losses really leapt up after 18 April when the Battle was said to have started. The rise in tank loss rates was approx double and in APC losses more than 75%
If these Ukrainian claims are at all accurate (it should be noted that documented, photographed claims of Russian losses are about two thirds of those claimed, so they certainly should not be out by much) then the Russians have lost 217 tanks and 404 APCs since the battle started
Even if they are exaggerrated by 20 percent, Russian losses would be extreme, around 20 full strength BTGs worth? And according to the Pentagon, the Russians have 92 BTGs in Ukraine.
That means they could have lost 20% of their tanks and APCs in Ukraine since the battle started (thats if the BTGs were at that point close to full strength. If they were considerably weaker, it could be higher).
And what have the Russians gained for this large loss? Incrementally a few kilometres here and a few kilometres there. Here is the situation as mapped by @War_Mapper a few hours ago and on 17 April. Ukraine Map, 30 April
There have been some small extension of the Russian lines heading south of Izyum and towards Lyman, but the pace is such that unless Ukrainian forces are actually close to collapse, the chance of a large scale encirclement is very small.
Pentagon intelligence also claims two things which are slowing down Russian advances. They are still suffering significant logistics problems (they need to stay close to their supply dumps) and they still dont have air superiority over the battlefield.
And now some worrying signs are creeping in for the Russians. 1st, there are indications that the Ukrainians are starting to deploy the loitering munition UAVs (Switchblade type) that were sent just a little while ago. This could be a major Russian problem
And UK MOD estimates are that problems are exhibited across the board for Russians, maybe most worryingly for them, morale problems are occuring.
A sign that Russian defeated troops into action from the Kyiv front might not have been the wisest choice.
Long story short. Unless the Ukrainians have been degraded to the point that their resistance is about to crack, and the Russians start moving swiftly to encircle their forces, its likely the Russian effort will peter out because of such high losses with little gains.
Finally, the plateauing of Russian losses followed by the decline in the last few days, could indicate a lessening in combat intensity as the failure of the Russians to breakthrough combined with the high losses starts to filter through.
Another worrying sign for the Russians are growing reports (and pictures) of accurate, long range artillery fire by the Ukrainians. Considering Ukr artillery capabilities should grow over the coming weeks, this will add to Russian losses.
Turns out that this strike revealed more than just effective long range artillery. Ukrainians claim they killed another Russian general. Showing continuing Ukrainian intelligence strength
@ISW update does seem to indicate a slowing in Russian advance on the Izyum front. If this continues for a few days, the losses could be cutting into Russian ability to maintain offensive operations
Another possible sign of slowing of combat intensity in the Battle of the Donbas. New Ukrainian loss claims of Russian tanks trending downwards. 18 new Russian tanks destroyed and 26 new AFV. Will be interesting to see if this decline continues
And very little Russian advance to go along with the decline in combat intensity.
Saw the point made that this decline in losses could indicate Ukrainian strength weakening. It could if the Russians seemed to be breaking through and advancing more than before. Seems that the opposite is happening. Russian attacks are decreasing in overall strength…
And the front line is stabilising. Much more likely then that the Russians are having to pause because of high losses and logistical problems.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

May 2
Will provide an update on the Battle of the Donbas later, but reading between the lines of the Ukrainian military communique this morning, does really seem that Russian forward movement is bogging down and the Russians are almost scared to advance. kmu.gov.ua/en/news/operat…
Struck by this paragraph near the end. Ukrainians seem mostly to be hitting Russian artillery, not many tanks at all. Plus shall we say a little confidence about repelling the Russian assaults. Remember, the Battle supposedly started 2 weeks ago. Image
If the Ukrainians destroyed 17 artillery systems (very large amount) and only 2
Tanks (seems very small), it could indicate that the fight was mostly ranged engagements with few Russian advances where tanks have been exposed.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 28
Pentagon briefing today, a few interesting points on Russian logistics and AirPower, and the Battle of the Donbas. defense.gov/News/Transcrip…
First, rather remarkable but 63 days into the war and fighting much closer to its supply dumps, the Russian army is still being severely limited by logistic problems. Progress forward is ‘incremental’
Basically logistics problems alone (not including Ukrainian resistance) means Russian forces can only ‘sustain’ more than a few kilometres of progress a day. This is still extraordinarily little.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 28
This is a point worth examining. We have lots of stress on what if Russia goes for societal mobilization now (normally by the way by those who argued that Russia would conquer Ukraine quickly). However, societal mobilization is not easy under the best of conditions.
Still voices speak (without evidence) that Russia is some large military power that can almost dictate terms in Ukraine. This article in @guardian might be the worst. No evidence given on Russian strength, but an assumption Russia can fight a long war. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
People seem to be forgetting that societal mobilization and long war has enormous political, economic and military risks for Russia. Its not just about calling soldiers to the ranks--its about training them and equipping them. Russia is not in the best position to do this at all.
Read 20 tweets
Apr 26
Reopening this because Ukrainian claims of losses point to a significant increase in combat activity in the fighting (assuming mostly Donbas) which a major increase in destroyed Russian equipment.
Most recent update from Ukrainan armed forces has a major acceleration in Russian tank losses. In only two days claimed Russian losses in tanks has risen by 45 (873 to 918) and APCs has stayed steady at 70 (2238-2308).
Before two days ago the Ukrainians were claiming that the Russians are losing tanks at a rate of 14.5 a day, which has gone up by 50% the last two (to 22.5). Worth watching to see if the rate stays high as it gives an indication that the fight is increasing.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 26
If you want a concrete example of the failures of realism staring us straight in the face, it’s Germany. A country with all the economic and technological requisites to be an assertive regional power, yet which is paralysed by its own politics and traditions.
And btw Russia is just as great example of the failures of realism. A country that had no idea that it was not the great power it thought it was, and thus has embarked on this self destructive spiral that it needn’t have done.
I’m intrigued that people see these tweets as arguments that Germany and Russia should play certain roles. They really aren’t. They are examples of how a realist model of state behavior fails to take into account huge variance in policy choices. Ostensibly powerful states…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 25
A great thread by @EliotACohen , and pleased to see the praise for @edwardstrngr , who I really think people should follow.
But watch out criticising the Russian military analysts, they can denounce en masse, when reflection would be better.
And I’d like to add that @MarkHertling has been consistently excellent on getting to the reality of shortcomings in the Russian military and strengths in the Ukrainians.
I just came across @general_ben in the last few weeks and he has some great reflections on relations with Ukraine and what the war means so far for the US military.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(