This is a insightful 15 tweet thread on the "Battle of Donbas' by @PhillipsPOBrien looking at Russian loss rates versus Ukrainian. You should read it all.👇
I'm going to highlight bits in this thread🧵to make a point about trucks 1/
As the Russian tactical truck fleet diminishes, the depth of Russian break-ins gets shallower & the chance of any sort of breakthrough followed by mobile operations disappears.
This is how a Pentagon spokesman phrased this problem👇 3/
"Still-continued logistics problems" boils down to not enough tactical trucks, efficiently used
The pace of operation the Putin regime insists upon means Russia simply cannot change over non-mech to mechanized logistics in the middle of the Ukraine war 4/
And this thread demonstrating modern warehouse operations in context was to teach that mechanized logistics is a decades long incremental process developing people, physical infrastructure, and information systems used in modern supply chains.
The Russian Army simply never made those organizational investments and its military leadership really doesn't have the 1st clue how to implement such a logistical system.
Not while the one it has is falling apart from vehicle casualties like this.
What this & the previous tweet both have in common -- beyond the hunting drone -- is the replacement of properly designed military vehicles with impressed civilian ones.
This was seen first in Mariupol where "Scooby Doo" vans started replacing tactical trucks.
This makes sense as the civilian vehicles are moving short distances from rail heads and the Russians can steal spares from Mariupol car/vehicle dealerships.
Unless there are a lot of Western loitering munitions arriving at the battle front in the next two weeks, or Ukraine does it's Kherson break out & mobile operations.
It doesn't look like Russia's current rates of loss will get to 'immobilization from a lack of trucks level' 15/
...by ~May 15th 2022.
1701 trucks isn't even 50% of 4,000.
This is part of the issue of making prediction based on straight line projections.
The people you are predicting about will make changes in their operations to avoid that predicted disaster.
16/
This doesn't mean I'm going to be wrong at the middle-May end date of my projection, but doing a straight line projection from now says I will be.
Call it a less than 25% possible outcome.
We shall see in two weeks.
17/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It has been a little while since I've talked about truck tires, but I've been DM-ed a couple of photos what are worth a thread.🧵
This is a Russian Grad launch truck with really old tires.👇
1/
Let's take a closer look at a clip of the front tire in the photo after I've played with the light & color.
There are cracks in the sidewall consistent with a really old tire along with rubber peeling debris at the bottom in the tire fold.
2/
The photo clip of the rear tire played with the same way is simply too blurry to determine more about the tire other than its marking nearest the hub are artifacts from its vulcanization curing press.👇
@QoqoBulos ...Failures of the W45, W47, and W52 warheads are still an active part of the debate about the reliability of the US nuclear weapons force moving into the future, without ongoing nuclear testing.[6]
A one-point safety test performed on the W47 warhead just prior the 1958...
2/
@QoqoBulos ... moratorium (Hardtack/Neptune) failed, yielding a 100-ton explosion. Because the test ban prohibited the testing needed for inherently safe one-point safe designs, a makeshift solution was adopted: a boron-cadmium wire was folded inside the pit during manufacture, and...
3/
This is something tweeted at me which needs to be addressed as it is a common assumption people make which isn't true, AKA Russian weapons are all trash.
It simply is not true.
I'm will explain why that is using the design history behind the M-1 Abrams vs. the T-90.🧵
...Lieutenant to Putin himself plus every level of procurement supporting the Russian military still hasn't sunk deeply into the minds of Western Defense Analysts.
Specifically, the USA spends $10 million a year supporting each and every active nuclear weapon in it's arsenal.
2/
That's $10 billion a year.
Russia's entire 2021 defense budget was estimated at $41.6 billion for EVERYTHING.
The levels of corruption demonstrated in Ukraine are such that the West needs to deeply consider the strategic implications of the Russian nuclear arsenal being
3/
Ukraine's destruction of these railway bridges require far more exposure of the declining Russian tactical truck fleet to Ukrainian ATGM/Mortar/Drone kill teams in the south.