Chornobyl (1986) & Fukushima (2011) are very well-known #nuclear disasters… but have you ever heard about Three Mile Island incident?

This coming May 4th many people will be talking about this event (thanks, @netflix), so let’s inform ourselves to know the FACTS about it.
Long story short:

In 1979 at Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in the USA, a cooling malfunction caused part of the core to melt in the #2 reactor. The TMI-2 reactor was destroyed.

Here’s what happened 👇
The Three Mile Island (TMI) Generating Station is a closed nuclear power plant located in Pennsylvania, USA 🇺🇸

It’s composed of 2 pressurized water reactors, TMI-1 & TMI-2, that started generating electricity in 1974 and 1978, respectively.
It was March 28, 1979, at 4 am, when TMI-2 was operating at 97% power.

The event was caused by a minor malfunction in the secondary cooling circuit which caused the temperature in the primary loop to raise

About 1 sec after this, the reactor was able to shut down automatically
Let’s remember that in a PWR like TMI-2, water is used as the primary cooling system for the reactor & it’s maintained at a very high pressure to keep it from boiling, & that’s the job of the pressurizer.

So, after the shutdown….
The pressurizer pressure started to exceed maximum levels so it was the job of the pilot-operated relief valve (PORV) to open and reduce that pressure.

BUT the PORV failed to close! & started leaking vital reactor coolant water used to keep it from overheating.
On top of this, the failure wasn’t revealed by the instrumentation! 😨 keeping the operators in the dark about this issue.

I know, too technical… So let’s imagine an opened champagne bottle being constantly shaken:
The system started automatically to mitigate the loss of cooling water, providing replacement water into the system.

BUT since the PORV was still open (🍾), water & steam escaped through it causing to raise the water levels in the pressurizer!
The operator's main objective was to keep the pressurizer from filling with water because if not, they couldn’t be able to control the pressure in the cooling system and it might rupture.

So they reduced the flow of replacement water…😨
Steam then formed in the system, & this caused the cooling pumps to vibrate; since this could damage the pumps, they were shut down ending the forced cooling of the reactor.

The operators still believed the system was nearly full of water due to the pressurizer levels indicated!
However, as coolant water boiled away, the reactor's fuel core was uncovered and became even hotter.
Following, the fuel rods were damaged & released radioactive material into the cooling water!

To have a better idea, check it out 👇
It was 6:22 am & in order to stop the loss of water through the PORV the operators closed a block valve between it and the pressurizer

However, superheated steam and gases blocked the flow of water through the core cooling system.🥵
Later that morning, operators tried to force more water into the reactor system to condense steam bubbles that they believed were blocking the flow of cooling water.


One hour later, operators were able to restore the forced cooling of the reactor core!👏
RADIOACTIVE RELEASES

Were there any radioactive releases? Well…
The compressors leaked & some gases went through high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and charcoal filters which removed most of the radionuclides, except for the noble gases.
TMI-2 radioactive gases released did not pose a health hazard because they were biologically inert and had a short half-life.
WONDERING ABOUT THE HYDROGEN BUBBLE?

When the reactor’s core was uncovered, there was a chemical reaction between the water & the zircaloy metal tubes holding the nuclear fuel pellets, this created hydrogen gas!

This time the instruments were able to indicate a hydrogen burn.
Operators removed this hydrogen "bubble" by periodically opening the vent valve on the pressurizer.

The @NRCgov officials believed the hydrogen bubble could explode, but it was never possible since there wasn’t enough oxygen in the system.
SHUTDOWN & ANALYSIS

After an anxious month, operators started to cool down the reactor by the natural movement of water; & almost 4yr later the head of the reactor was removed in order to access the remains of the core.
A later investigation revealed that at least 45% of the core had melted!

Most of the melted core material had remained in the core region & this was confirmed in 1988 by a multinational investigation. Samples taken indicated that there was less damage than anticipated.
PUBLIC CONCERN & HEALTH IMPACTS

As expected, the TMI incident caused concerns about the possibility of radiation-induced health effects in the area surrounding the plant.

So @PAHealthDept took action on this matter to ensure the safety of the public.
For over 18 years, @PAHealthDept kept a registry of more than 30,000 people who lived within 5 miles of TMI at the time of the accident in order to record any health effects, & it was discontinued in 1997, without any evidence of unusual health trends in the area.
Also, a lot of independent studies have assessed the radiation releases & possible effects on the 👬 & 🌿since the incident none has found any adverse health effects such as cancers that might be linked to the accident.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nuclear Hazelnut 👷🏻‍♀️

Nuclear Hazelnut 👷🏻‍♀️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NuclearHazelnut

Apr 6
In movies, a #NuclearReactor is always shown with a shining electric blue haze & we all assume that it’s part of the special effects.

BUT, I've got news for you: It's actually called the Cherenkov Effect & as said by @DE_Nuclear:

Cherenkov Effect is Science, Not Science Fiction
The electric blue haze is a natural phenomenon known as the Cherenkov radiation or Cherenkov Effect.

Let's check out the science behind it👇
As you may already know, the Cherenkov effect can be seen near the reactor & used fuel pools at #NuclearPowerPlants.

The particles concerned by the effect (electrons and positrons) are very light, & they can reach very high speeds causing brief flashes of light. 🤯
Read 9 tweets
Apr 3
We know that #NuclearEnergy is one of the largest sources of zero-emissions power in the 🌎, but as any other energy-generation industry, it generates a "waste".

And I got some news for you: It is actually consider a valuable resource, not a waste!
Say what!? 👀

Don’t worry, the 🇺🇸 @GovNuclear published:
“5 Fast Facts About #SpentNuclearFuel

Let’s read it and keep learning together:
1.#NuclearWaste is an incorrect term for used or spent fuel (Let’s all take note! - myself included)📝

#UsedFuel is made up of metal fuel rods that contains small ceramic pellets of enriched U-235 & it always stay in a solid state.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 30
Do you know how many bananas you need to eat to die of radiation? 😱

That's right, you can die of radiation by eating 🍌. But don't worry! I don’t actually think anyone would dare to do it.

So, here is a guide on: What to know before you go bananas about #NuclearRadiation?
In 2017 the @UofCalifornia read our minds by answering a question that we all have:

How much #radiation is too much radiation? And well, the answer is more simple than we thought 👉it’s just a bunch of bananas.
But first, we need to get familiar and understand some terms. Are you ready?

Everything is composed of atoms (Yep, the periodic table). Some of these atoms are unstable & decay or break apart, & when this happens it emits what we call #Radiation.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 29
Check out this great question by @CleanEnRev !

Have you ever wonder how is spent fuel transported?
Let's find out 👇
First of all, fuel assemblies remain submerged during all handling operations. The minimum shielding requirement is ~3m of water for a high burn-up, & they use special cranes for handling operations

Check out one of the main differences between #BWRs and #PWRs spent fuel pools👇
BWR pools are filled with demineralized water, and PWR pools are normally filled with a dilute (~0.2M) boric acid solution💧

The role of boric acid in nuclear power plant is basically to control nuclear fission rate (among other uses)

Check out these 2 cross-section pics👇 ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25
Can you throw #NuclearWaste in the trash can?🗑

Will you become The Hulk if you are exposed to its #radiation?🧟‍♀️

Do you actually know what happens with nuclear waste?

Come! Let’s find out 👇

Spoiler alert: It doesn’t glow green like you see in some movies.
Before we get into crazy nuclear terms, let’s identify the types of #NuclearWaste:
 
High-Level: Most of the #NuclearWaste- the ‘scary’ one

Intermediate-L: Components, medical & lab items- 🏥 also generate this waste

Low-L: Tools, clothes-Hospitals, research facilities, NPP too
Ready for the action? Now we need to get something straight:

#Radiation?Moving energy. It’s a natural process

So, #Radioactivity refers to an atom losing energy by emitting particles capable of removing electrons from other atoms ⚠️Could be hazardous
 
We’ll discuss this later*
Read 12 tweets
Mar 22
A containment building of a #NuclearPowerPlant is a thick structure design to resist earthquakes, overpressure and hurricane winds.🌪

But, have you ever wonder what would happen if a jet crashed into it? Let’s find out together 🛩 Image
Lucky for us, @SandiaLabs solved this question way back in 1988.

They launched a supersonic jet against a concrete wall to test its resistance. 🤯 Crazy, right? BUT, to our surprise, it only caused cracks of 60mm deep in the concrete.

interestingengineering.com/crashed-jet-nu…
Ok, but that was a test. What about now?🤔

As part of the probabilistic risk analysis done for the #NPPs, the risk of a jet ACCIDENTALLY striking a plant is considered, but NOT an intentional attack.

Let’s ask the experts about the risk of an impact in a Containment Building👇🏻
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(