Ive been pondering why the US hasnt done even MORE to link our #energy policy with national security and the war against Russian aggression in Ukraine and become the arsenal of clean energy for world’s democracies. thirdway.org/memo/making-th… 1/
This would serve three goals: 1) offset Europe’s reliance on Russia fossil fuels and nuclear fuel 2) accelerate the long-term shift to clean energy 3) stand up to petro-bullies as I wrote in @politicopolitico.com/news/magazine/… 2/
And 67% of Americans back taking MORE action even if it spurs inflation. These days only Kermit the frog has 67% approval. 4/
This is not at all abt renewables or any specific source of energy. It’s about energy from the US and others that share our values displacing Russian fuel. 5/
This is the path to ALL #cleanenergy including nuclear, hydrogen, and carbon capture as well as renewables. 6/
As @BrianSchatz said today abt #savediablocanyon we have to do ALL of it domestically AND we need to help our allies do all of it too. 7/
All the building blocks are here. We’re using the Defense Production Act. The House voted to update the 1941 Lend-Lease Act the US used to stand up to authoritarianism in Europe then. washingtonpost.com/politics/house… 8/
We wont (and shouldnt) send troops to Ukraine but we can mobilize American know-how, industry, and wealth just as weve done before when Europe was threatened by authoritarians. 9/
The US should put a name to this plan and galvanize the American public to action. If this is the struggle we believe it is. Name it. Make it the crusade it requires. Turn America into the Arsenal of Clean Energy. /End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As @axios reported this AM there’s a new report by IEEFA on NuScale’s planned small reactor at INL. There are some salient and valid points but they are undermined by questionable conclusions, comparisons, and omissions in the report that raise concern abt confirmation bias. 1/
Several times through the report, the authors compare the long delays and failures of the construction of the AP1000 at Vogtle and Summer to the NuScale plant. Thats an unfair comparison: like great dane vs an elephant. Sure, both big in their context and both mammals but… 2/
An AP1000 is a megaproject, and the construction of the NuScale Plant is designed to be completely different. It is very misleading to compare these very different nuclear plants or draw conclusions for NuScale manufacturing or building based on AP1000. 3/
Feels like a good day to talk about why we need carbon capture, utilization & storage technologies deployed widely in order to meet our climate goals. CCUS is going to be a big part of our decarbonization pathway. THREAD. 1/
First and foremost, scientists and experts widely agree we need CCUS to meet our net-zero commitments. Reports from both the @IEA & @IPCC have repeatedly shown that *NOT* utilizing CCUS significantly hurts our chances of meeting our climate goals. 2/
Back in theFifth Assessment Report, @IPCC_CH found that the overall cost of reaching net-zero by 2050 became 138% more expensive without CCUS. 3/
When Germany shuttered its nuclear plants (and kept its coal online) not only did it miss its carbon goals, it became more reliant on Russian natural gas for firm electricity. 1/
This is not working out well, as gas prices skyrocket and suspicions mount that the Russians may be manipulating supply. nytimes.com/2021/09/22/bus… 2/
Of course, this is a Europe-wide problem, and even countries like the UK w diverse energy supplies (incl nuclear) are facing big challenges. 3/
the @NWSL needs to be aggressive w this kind of bullshit. DC is already plagued by one of the worst owners in sport in Dan Snyder. And the NFL enables him. There is no way Baldwin should be allowed to keep owning a women’s professional soccer team. League needs zero tolerance. 2/
It’s particularly galling to see this in @NWSL when men’s pro teams incl @dcunited are adding women to very senior front office and coaching ranks. 3/
Okay, everyone, we’ve been crunching the BID numbers to see what’s in this deal and how it’ll impact clean energy and climate. Warning, this is a long 🧵 … 1/
This isn’t #HotFERCSummer (h/t @RepCasten) but the TL;DR verdict - this is the down payment for the US to go big, like really big, on clean energy, climate, and jobs.