1) Having read the Politico article carefully, my original suspicions have shifted a bit.

politico.com/news/2022/05/0…
2) First, Politico is in the Domestic DOJ/FBI pipeline with the New York Times.

CNN = State Dept
WaPo = CIA/Intel
NYT/Politico = FBI/DOJ
3) So the outlet sourcing leans toward DOJ and Justice Branch coverage. Which makes sense given the leaker is inside SCOTUS giving stolen documents to Politico.
4) However, there's no citation in the article for the actual alignment of the other justices with the Alito opinion. Factually there's nothing other than Politico author supposition for judicial alignment with Alito opinion.
5) There's nothing cited in the politico report that would indicate this is anything more than just Alito telling his peers what his position on the oral arguments was/is.

Essentially, here's my draft of what I believe. There's nothing more than that present. Reread it.
6) With no factual citation for the claim that Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett are in concurrence, the article framework could likely be much ado about absolutely nothing.
7) It's one justice's opinion, which is not surprising as Alito has already outlined this opinion before.

Nothing else.

Every reaction is complete projection based on unsubstantiated claims (of concurrences) by the Politico journalist. The "majority" is the part that matters.
8) The "majority" is the part that matters.... and there is zero evidence to substantiate a claim that a majority decision exists.

Upon reread, it looks like FAKE NEWS
9) Then you switch to motive. Why would Politico want to participate in a strategically explosive political effort to manufacture a fear of a not real SCOTUS opinion based on fabricated claims?
10) The answer to that question is found in the immediate reaction from the political left.

Just the accusation alone is enough to trigger the most extreme of leftist base political demands.
11) From that perspective, everyone is reacting to a carefully coordinated con job.... that carries the odor of Ron Klain, the DNC, and a desperately needed political reset for 2022 all over it.

/END
"The leak is real, the news is fake"

Sound familiar?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

TheLastRefuge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastRefuge2

May 4
1) It's a smart play. Dubya ain't stupid (a-hole yes, but not politically stupid). Bush knows democrats are going to vote for Kemp in primary. He knows to a certainty.

This endorsement lets Dubya look like he defeats Trump when Kemp wins the primary. Fuels media etc. etc.
2) The GOPe Club get the scalp of a Trump-endorsed candidate losing in the primary. The Club old guard get to push the 2022 'see MAGA are extremists' narrative, which, not accidentally, aligns with McConnell's narrative.

It's all club insider stuff.
3) The key point is that the Kemp primary victory is a predetermined outcome.

Bush isn't going out on a limb, he knows this part of the performance is all club pantomime, theater, stuff for media to use as ammo against Trumpism.
Read 5 tweets
May 4
1) Fact based assertion. Democrat Stacy Abrams will be the next governor in GA because the Georgia republican party (the GOPe Club) has constructed that outcome with that exact intent.

Bookmark this. Image
2) Democrat Stacy Abrams is running unopposed. She will not need any votes in the Georgia primary to advance to the November general election.
3) Georgia is an OPEN PRIMARY state. Meaning anyone can vote for any party in the primary.

Dems can vote for Republicans.
Republicans can vote for Democrats.

REMEMBER: Stacy Abrams is unopposed.
Read 9 tweets
May 3
1) For that angle, you have to remember the *other* all important strategic stuff Klain Inc. has lined up for June of 2022 is the J6 open committee hearings.

The normal SCOTUS schedule for released rulings would conflict with the need for J6 media oxygen.
2) By strategically manipulating the leak of the SCOTUS decision (accurately or inaccurately), that everyone will be awaiting, in advance of the J6 hearings, to clear the narrative media distribution pipeline would be beneficial politically.
3) In essence, force the court into a position of advanced publication of the decision, so that you can clear the June media schedule for people to stay focused on the pantomime the J6 Democrats have planned for presentation.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 30
Indeed, they want us to move along, move past the issues they created with the pandemic nonsense.
They need us to participate in the great new pretense where consequences are inconsequential, discussion is disinformation.
We are to listen to their square dance music and participate gleefully, while pretending our economic barn isn’t burning down around us.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 28
1) I don't think it's because the Twitter engineers are *doing something* different; remember, the algo system has been locked down. It looks to me like the lockdown resulted in them *not* doing something.

[The cyber equivalent of paper shredding in background]
2) My tech hunch has always been that this platform takes advantage of data processing containers, with engagement dependent on what container you were assigned to. It makes sense, and (big picture) the interface has always shown that technology fingerprint.
3) My suspicion is the announced algo "lockdown" (post Musk deal) has resulted in the connections between the disparate containers (data processing definitions, aka algos) being opened/less regulated as a result of the lockdown opening the engagement gateway.
Read 9 tweets
Apr 25
1) Keep in mind that Twitter is slated to report first-quarter earnings this Thursday, and originally the board was going to wait until after that earnings announcement to respond to the bid.
2) Something changed.
3) My suspicion is the financials of the Q1 earnings report will not support the $54.20 high end evaluation offer originally proposed by Musk.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(