Thread on Omicron subvariants and what they might mean for UK:

TLDR: reasonable chance of a new wave of infections in 4-6 weeks or so, boosters should reduce admissions & deaths but not entirely. Ditto long covid. Can expect more future waves too. 1/12
the UK original Omicron wave was BA.1 in Dec/Jan, followed by BA.2 wave in March.

BA.2 remains dominant (98% of cases) and we are now on the firm downward slope of that wave, with infections & admissions decreasing rapidly.

But... 2/12 Image
South Africa has just entered a new wave driven by new Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5, while in the US Omicron variant BA.2.12.1 is growing rapidly.

A few recent papers have shed more light into what this might mean... 3/12 ImageImageImageImage
A preprint from @fucyanOvO investigated how good the blood of vaxxed people with/without BA.1 infection was at fighting BA.4, BA.5 and BA.2.12.1 off.

BA.4 & 5 better at escaping vax & inf immunity than BA.2 but not better at getting into cells. BA.2.12.1 better at both. 4/12 ImageImage
Previous infection with BA.1 (what we had in Dec/Jan) might well not stop you getting infected with these new substrains (prob due to mutation at L452)

@sigallab reported similar - although boosted *plus* BA.1 infection much better than just prev BA.1 infection (get vaxxed) 5/12 ImageImage
We don't know much about severity of these new Omicron variants - but so far assumption is that they are no worse than prev Omicrons - especially given high population prev infection & boosters.

Although boosters wane rapidly vs infection, less so against severe disease. 6/12 ImageImageImageImage
BA.4, BA.5 & BA.2.12.1 *are* in the UK but in v low numbers.

However, most recent data for England shows them growing as a % of cases against BA.2 (current dominant one). Still *tiny numbers* so nothing definitive.

Wld be easier to tell if we were doing more PCR tests... 7/12 Image
*If* any/all of BA.12.1, BA4. BA.5 take off here, we'll likely see new wave of infections - perhaps similar in size to prev Omicron waves but hopefully fewer admissions & deaths (esp cos of 4th dose in >75s).

These are not (as far as we know) super scary new variants BUT 8/12
A new wave would still add strain again to NHS, still disrupt education (and in exam season) and workplaces and we would likely see a few hundred more thousand *more* people developing Long Covid. Not good. 9/12 Image
And what *is* concerning about Omicron is that compared to prev variants, immunity is not that long lived & it gives less protection againts non-Omicron variants.

An Omicron-specific booster was no better than the existing booster, so a new Omicron vax unlikely to help. 10/12 ImageImage
So until a new variant emerges (also not great), we might get repeated waves of Omicron variants every 4-6 months - each causing disruption & illness.

I think we can & should mitigate this with ventilation, testing, supported isolation if +ve, masks during peaks etc etc. 11/12 Image
In the meantime it's wait and see for these Omicron subvariants in the UK. Even if they keep growing, won't see any impact on overall numbers for several weeks.

And thanks to @Tuliodna @sigallab @fucyanOvO @UKHSA @COGUK_ME etc for the rapid research and making it public. 12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Christina Pagel - @chrischirp.bsky.social

Prof. Christina Pagel - @chrischirp.bsky.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrischirp

Oct 19, 2024
Important 🧵on our new peer-reviewed paper:

The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid.

They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17 Image
Our study, led by Prof @katebrown220, looked at all hospitalisations in England in children with a Covid diagnosis or positive test from Aug 2020-Aug 2023.
We then *excluded* all admissions where a Covid diagnosis was incidental (ie not why they were in hospital)
2/17 Image
Infants (babies under 1) are generally at higher risk from respiratory infections, plus they are the age group that, if infected, are overwhelmingly meeting the virus for the first time.

They are not vaccinated and have not had it before. 3/17
Read 18 tweets
Sep 26, 2024
Prof @Kevin_Fong giving the most devastating and moving testimony to the Covid Inquiry of visiting hospital intensive care units at the height of the second wave in late Dec 2020.

The unimaginable scale of death, the trauma, the loss of hope.
Please watch this 2min clip.
And here he breaks down while explaining the absolute trauma experienced by smaller hospitals in particular - the "healthier" ICU patients were transferred out, leaving them coping with so much death.

They felt so alone.
Here Prof Fong explains how every nurse he met was traumatised by watching patients die, being only able to hold up ipads to their relatives and how it went against their normal practice of trying to ensure a dignified death, with family there.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 28, 2024
THREAD: I asked what the point of Public Inquiries is for @bmj_latest

We've spent hundreds of millions of £ on Inquiries over last decades, generating deep understanding of failures & 1000s of recommendations.

But v few recommendations get implemented!
What is going on?

1/12 Image
E.g. Covid-19 Inquiry has cost £94 million so far - and is projected to cost over £200m by its end (it still has years to go).

1st report published (out of at least 9) found major flaws and proposed 10 recommendations.

Chances are low that they will be implemented :-( 2/12


Image
Image
Image
Image
Inst for Government looked at 68 Inquiries from 1990-2017.
The Inquiries cost over £630 million and made 2,625 recommendations.

Only 6/68 Inquiries have received full scrutiny by a parliamentary select committee on implementation of recommendations. 3/12 Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 9, 2024
🧵War causes direct civilian deaths but also indirect deaths over the following years.

Recent paper estimates eventual total direct & indirect deaths in Gaza attributable to the war - 10% of entire pop'n.

I want to explain these estimates and why deaths must be counted. 1/13 Image
Why count casualties from war anyway? For moral, legal and strategic reasons.

1 - owe it to those who have died
2 - International law says must count & identify dead as far as possible
3 - monitor progress of war & learn from tactics

2/13 Image
There are direct and indirect casualties of war. Direct deaths include those who killed by fighting or bombs.

Indirect deaths are those that die when they would otherwise have lived because of one or more of: lack of food, healthcare, housing, sanitation, income, hope. 3/13 Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 1, 2024
THREAD: the summer Covid wave in the UK continues.
Basically, there is a LOT of Covid around and not a lot of other respiratory viruses.

If you have cold or flu symptoms, it's probably Covid.

The latest hospital data from England shows steady, quite high levels. 1/8 Image
But admissions don't tell us how much virus is circulating more generally. The best (but imperfect) measure we have is wasterwater measurements, and only in Scotland and not England.

Scotland's wastewater is showing a huge July peak - highest since Omicron's 1st yr in 2022 2/8 Image
Because different people shed different amounts of virus and variants can matter too, you can't for sure infer how many people were infected between different wasterwater peaks. BUT given the size, I'd say it's pretty likely this is the largest peak since 2022 in Scotland 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Jul 23, 2024
THREAD:
I wrote about Baroness Hallett's Inquiry Module 1 report for @bmj_latest .

She found that there was *never* a plan to keep a pandemic death toll down - I discuss this and what it means going foward.

Main points below: 1/14 Image
The headline most seen is that the UK planned for the wrong pandemic.

While it is true that was far too narrow a focus on a flu pandemic, that is not the most telling bit.

To me the most telling bit, is what the plan did NOT do 2/14


Image
Image
Image
Image
The issue is less the wrong disease, but that there was never a plan to prevent one at all – of any disease type.

The plan was *never* about reducing the number of pandemic deaths. 3/14 Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(