🧵Justice Alito argues “…the Court has long been reluctant to recognize rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution…we must ask what the 14th amendment means…the clear answer is that the 14th amendment does not provide the right to an abortion.”1/25
By this logic, here’s what else the 14th/the Constitution does not protect. A thread: (2/25)
Marrying someone of a different race (Loving v. Virginia, 1967) (3/25)
Birth control (Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965; Eisenstadt v. Baird,1973, others) (4/25)
Women with young children who want to work (Phillips v. Martin Marietta, 1971) (5/25)
Women's ability to preside over legal documents involving their kids (Reed v. Reed, 1971) (6/25)
Housing and benefits for female members of the armed services (Frontiero v. Richardson, 1973) (7/25)
Advertising jobs that specify only men can apply (Pittsburgh Press v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 1973). (8/25)
Women who get pregnant on the job and are fired (Cleveland BOE v. LaFleur, 1974) (9/25)
Widows (Kahn v. Shevin, 1974; Wengler v. Druggists Mutual, 1980) (10/25)
Women who make less than men for the same work (Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, 1974) (11/25)
Women’s right to serve on juries (Taylor v. Louisiana, 1975; J.E.B. v. Alabama, 1994) (12/25)
Social security benefits for women (Weinberger v. Weisenfeld, 1975; Califano v. Goldfarb, 1977) (13/25)
Unemployment benefits for pregnant women (Turner v. Department of Employment Security, 1975) (14/25)
Pregnant women’s exclusion from employer health and disability plans (General Electric v. Gilbert, 1976) (15/25)
Women’s right to get jobs traditionally held by men (Dothard v. Rawlinson, 1977) (16/25)
Pregnant women’s rights to advance in the workplace (Nashville Gas v. Satty, 1977) (17/25)
Women of color’s access to higher education (Regents of the Univ of Cav. Bakke, 1978; Fisher v. Univ of TX, 2016) (18/25)
Benefits for unemployed moms (Califano v. Westcott, 1979) (19/25)
A wife’s property within a marriage (Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 1980) (20/25)
Sexual harassment in the workplace (Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 1986) (21/25)
Pregnant women who choose to work dangerous jobs (UAW v. Johnson Controls, 1991) (22/25)
Sexual harassment and abuse in secondary schools (Franklin v. Gwinnet County Public Schools, 1992; Gebser v. Lago Vista ISD, 1998; Davis v. Monroe County BOE, 1999) (23/25)
Women who want to attend a state-funded college of their choosing (US v. Virginia, 1996) (24/25)
Women’s testimony in domestic violence (Davis v. Washington, 2006)
Anyone not a white, straight man (25/25 FIN).

This is not a complete list btw.
Eisenstadt is 1972. Apologies for the typo.
Well now it's suddenly letting me add more tweets so this list also includes the right to same sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015).
The silence in the Constitution about women, POC, LGBTQ is a feature, not a bug.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Lauren MacIvor Thompson

Dr. Lauren MacIvor Thompson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lmacthompson1

May 5
I didn't have time to make coffee first thing like I usually do. I drove one kid to school, completely forgot there was a parent orientation for next year & was halfway home by the time I remembered.
Then I thought, "well at least I can run to the pharmacy to drop off this prescription finally."

Yet suddenly I find myself in my driveway...🤦‍♀️
I go back to the pharmacy. It doesn't open til 9. Which I knew already because I tried to drop off the scrip yesterday at 8:30. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️
Read 4 tweets
Jun 5, 2019
1/Good morning! I am compelled to write my first ever tweet thread because @CokieRoberts on @NPR this morning stated that she could not find abortion ads in 19thc newspapers and therefore historians are just playing at pro-choice politics.
2/here is the link to the interview where you can hear her make the claim: npr.org/2019/06/05/729…
3/Everything starts off fine where Roberts describes how abortion became illegal before Roe v. Wade.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(